I see the future of the MAs as brighter than it has been in a long time. Here's my thinking:
a brilliant group of historically very well-informed, non-authoritarian and experimentally-minded TMAists has emerged in the western world, centered in the UK but rapidly expanding elsewhere, who have (i) rediscovered the CQ street-defense roots of the TMAs and the crucial role of forms in encoding, in somewhat covert form, sensible and effective combat techniques, (ii) worked out realistic, non-compliant combat-sparring protocols for allowing practitioners to hone their fighting skills against untrained violent assailants with a minimum of time spent in hospital ERs, and (iii) have learned to write in a lucid, logically satisfying way that fully motivates their historical perspective (based on detailed knowledge of sources and a refusal to indulge in, or tolerate, a romantic mystification of the TMAs fed by mythmongering and legendary history) and logical analyses of kihon movements and the relationship between these movements on the one hand and combat moves on the other. The members of this group do serious
research—empirically-based observations feeding formation of general principles—whose ultimate goal is the reduction of the bewildering variety of MA techs to the interaction of overarching strategies with biomechanical specifics. Once these principles are learned and fully understood, and the biomechanical conditions we have to work with given human skeletal and neurological facts, many tactical outcomes can be deduced directly from the formal patterns (kata, hyungs, hsings) of the TMAs. If these methods of application (derived from the forms by general principles and a systematic approach to interpreting pattern movements according to these principles) are trained under intensely realistic conditions as per (ii) above, the result will be confident, effective fighters capable of defending themselves as well in the 21st century as the small, elite group of Asian MAists who gave us the TMAs were able to do in the 19th and early 20th.
This realization has already led to a tremendous resurgence of interest in bunkai for TMA forms, and has provided both livelihoods and pulpits for MAists such as Iain Abernethy, Bill Burgar, Rick Clark, Patrick McCarthy, Stuart Anslow, Simon O'Neil and increasingly many others to both carry out their research and teaching in this area and to publicize their findings to a wider audience. The focus on various MAs, whether the CMAs, `traditional' karate, `old school' TKD/TSD, and others, will I think eventually lead to a profound break between the tournament competition-centered activities of a large group of MA institutions and practitioners, on the one hand, and the CQ SD-based training of a smaller, but equally devoted group of practitioners who see their arts as expressions of jutsu, rather than athletic performance or spectacle. And this latter group, I believe, will continue to grow well into the long-term future.
So, somewhat uncharacteristically, I'm completely optimistic about the future of the MAs...
