Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Neo-Confucianism that Korean culture is based on looked down on physical fighting and uphelp the scholarly professions. I have read several times that by the 20th century rolled around martial artists, including those who practiced (or "played" to be more accurate) Taekkyon were viewed, basically, as ruffians. This viewpoint was prevalent when Taekwon-Do got its start in the 1950s, too.
I imagine that wearing suits and ties for formal functions such as testings was a way to fight against this negative view of martial artists as ruffians or gangsters. It was probably something of an appeal to Neo-Confucian values; the Master doing the testing and the rest of the panel dressed in suits because dressing up is what you do for a special event.
Pax,
Chris
Having traveled in Asia and seen how folks in general dress a lot nicer than we do here in the US, it makes sense.
I'm glad you folks have explained that. It is a practice that I would find insulting, if it were in my line of training (which it isn't).
Same reason basketball players in high school dress up before a game.
I imagine that wearing suits and ties for formal functions such as testings was a way to fight against this negative view of martial artists as ruffians or gangsters. It was probably something of an appeal to Neo-Confucian values; the Master doing the testing and the rest of the panel dressed in suits because dressing up is what you do for a special event.
Very interesting, and probably true. I wonder if the old Korean GMs realize gangsters and ruffians are amongst the best dressed individuals in Western society?
Very interesting, and probably true. I wonder if the old Korean GMs realize gangsters and ruffians are amongst the best dressed individuals in Western society?
I'm not really sure why you would find it insulting if your examiner dressed in a suit during a promotional test. Is there a particular reason you'd react that way?
I've been to plenty of promotional tests where the examiners wore doboks instead of suits but I have no problem with people wearing suits. When I am on a testing panel I prefer wearing a suit myself.
Pax,
Chris
I like how a suit looks on a person (male or female) but in an MA environment, I don't think it makes the person look their best. Instead it shows distance by wearing clothes you can't imagine anyone training in.
the ITA gives their Masters a nice Navy jacket at promotion. Paired with tan pants, it looks pretty good. So those wearing the Jacket with matching pants are indeed also in uniform. It's not like the head head judges are expected to do any high flying kicks or the splits...
Makes it kind of easy to spot the big wigs from afar...though it's tricky, not all wear it (my Instructor would rather be caught dead then wear it)