kik said:
White uniforms are the tradition and the instructors wear the white with black v neck, That's just the way it is But glad2behere is wrong as far as ...YOU DON'T wash your belt, and when your belt becomes freyed it just means thats because you've used it well. But hey I'm old fashioned.
KIK
Why don't you wash your belt? You sweat on it, bleed on it; it's possible that there is other people's sweat and blood on it, too. That's just slightly... unhygienic, you know?
Yes, I know the whole bit about "washing out everything you've learned." Come now - if that happens when you wash your belt, let me know. I'd like to study that belt. Tradition for the sake of tradition is meaningless. Tradition for the sake of "my teacher did it this way..." is almost as bad. Tradition for the sake of "my teacher did it this way BECAUSE..." is the way to go.
Now, I washed my first white belt and it turned brown. So, that would be a logical reason NOT to wash your belt.
As far as uniforms go... I'd say, wear what you feel comfortable with. Just realize that some people will look at you differently. Okinawan practitioners just went out in there everyday wear; there are some photos of them working out their underwear. The Japanese karate-gi was modeled on Kano's Judo-gi, to help promote the art/sport and make the Japanese more comfortable with it. The Koreans adopted a pull-over top to distinguish their art from the Japanese one. Some taekwondo schools still use the Japanese style cut.
Who is right? For their purposes, they all are. Bruce doesn't like the hakama because it's a Japanese piece of clothing, and he's practicing a Korean art. That's great, for him; another guy might not be able to get a han-bok, so he sticks with the hakama. Still good. The cut and/or color isn't going to make or break an art - though it may cloud people's perceptions of it.
Am I making sense? Or am I overtalking the topic here?