Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I only have to kicks to the side, one is with the blade, a quick kick and the other is with the heel but with thus one you pivot on the planted foot for additional range and power. So my experience is limited on this but I prefer the heel. It makes use of my long and powerful legs. The one utilizing the blade is meant to be quick, but Im not quick so using this kick puts me at somewhat of a disadvantage. The other kick is slow as well but with the exteded range and my long legs it makes up for the fact.When you're doing this kick, what part of the foot do you prefer to hit with, the blade of the foot or the heel and why?
I'll post my answers shortly!
Mike
Well, I know I'm outnumbered here, but here goes anyway.![]()
I learned the side blade before the heel, and have been doing it long enough that it is more comfortable. Also, must keep in mind what we're striking to. I only use this to soft tissue (thighs, side of shin, lower belly), and blade gives something of a cutting effect (like a knife hand). Another consideration is, I train--and would be in any self defense situation--wearing shoes. Blade of the sole of a shoe is much more cutting than a bare foot. And then the personal: have just never developed enough speed with heel to make it effective. Maybe as a finishing blow I'd use it.
My experience with shoes is that the initial striking area is now even further offline of the line of the bones of the leg than it is barefoot, leaving you more vulnerable to twisting an ankle.
I don't do much kicking these days but when I was taught I was taught both but preferred kicking with the heel. Kicking with the blade was hard on my ankle. :asian:
And just when I'd repped you on another thread....:lfao: J/K