Heel up vs heel down.

Ironbear24

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
482
I am mostly talking about the karate reverse punch here. In American kenpo it was often heel up, since I been in this other system of karate it is all about heel down.

In my opinion I don't really notice more or less power but I feel more stable with heel down. Sometimes when throwing this punch people "run into it" and you end up going backward while they get hit hard.

I notice with heel down this doesn't really happen, however with heel and the weigh being more on the ball of the foot I feel more mobile and quick. (As quick as a 200 pound guy can be of course).

Have any of you been taught both ways and if you have which do you prefer?
 

Headhunter

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,598
Don't know what kenpo you were learning but every place I've been in for kenpo is always heel down
 

donald1

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
3,538
Reaction score
818
I cant speak for kenpo but in karate its preferred heel down. When im practing goju ryu the only time i can think when heel is up is when in cat stance
 

Headhunter

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,598
EPak American kenpo.
Well then I hate to say this your instructor doesn't that seem to really know his stuff since in American kenpo it's always been heel down it's even said so in ed parkers book and if you read lee wedlakes book lessons with ed Parker. Parker always taught it heel down
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,404
Reaction score
9,168
Location
Pueblo West, CO
The way we generate power, the heel should be down. If you're raising it, it generally means you're too far away from your target. This weakens your base, which is why you're being knocked backwards. And whether you notice it or not, it's robbing you of power. Moving backwards means there's kinetic energy NOT being delivered to your target.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,255
Reaction score
4,964
Location
San Francisco
There is a lot of variety in the various kenpo lineages, there is no one single "EPAK" system. According to some, EPAK does not really exist, as it was a term Mr. Parker never used, but came into being after his death. I personally prefer to refer to lineages based on the downstream of his first generation students, or others who have become prominent in kenpo.

The heel up or down issue is debated between lineages. There is no single school of thought. I don't like the heel up; in my history in the Tracy lineage, we did heel down.

In my history in the Chinese methods, it is all about heel down. It isn't just stability. When you plant that heel you can push your back foot into the ground and drive a stronger torso rotation and make that punch stronger. When you need to be mobile, then you step and run and be mobile. When you need to land a punch, you want to be rooted and powerful. You apply what you need, when you need it.
 
OP
Ironbear24

Ironbear24

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
482
Well then I hate to say this your instructor doesn't that seem to really know his stuff since in American kenpo it's always been heel down it's even said so in ed parkers book and if you read lee wedlakes book lessons with ed Parker. Parker always taught it heel down

We won lots of competitions so I don't think it is the worst thing ever or anything like that, but I won't argue with you that it wasn't wrong.

Judging by the responses here it was a mistake to raise my heel.
 
OP
Ironbear24

Ironbear24

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
482
There is a lot of variety in the various kenpo lineages, there is no one single "EPAK" system. According to some, EPAK does not really exist, as it was a term Mr. Parker never used, but came into being after his death. I personally prefer to refer to lineages based on the downstream of his first generation students, or others who have become prominent in kenpo.

The heel up or down issue is debated between lineages. There is no single school of thought. I don't like the heel up; in my history in the Tracy lineage, we did heel down.

In my history in the Chinese methods, it is all about heel down. It isn't just stability. When you plant that heel you can push your back foot into the ground and drive a stronger torso rotation and make that punch stronger. When you need to be mobile, then you step and run and be mobile. When you need to land a punch, you want to be rooted and powerful. You apply what you need, when you need it.

Sifu Delgado. He was taught by sigung labounty.
 
OP
Ironbear24

Ironbear24

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
482
I cant speak for kenpo but in karate its preferred heel down. When im practing goju ryu the only time i can think when heel is up is when in cat stance

The front heel is up or the back heel? For us we do front heel up back heel down.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,255
Reaction score
4,964
Location
San Francisco
The front heel is up or the back heel? For us we do front heel up back heel down.
For a reverse punch? FRONT heel up??? Without actually having seen what you are talking about, I will say that sounds like a big problem to me. I had just assumed you were talking about the rear heel up. I am honestly completely taken by surprise here. That seems almost negligent.
 
OP
Ironbear24

Ironbear24

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
482
For a reverse punch? FRONT heel up??? Without actually having seen what you are talking about, I will say that sounds like a big problem to me. I had just assumed you were talking about the rear heel up. I am honestly completely taken by surprise here. That seems almost negligent.

I was asking about the cat stance in that post.
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,026
Reaction score
10,594
Location
Hendersonville, NC
I am mostly talking about the karate reverse punch here. In American kenpo it was often heel up, since I been in this other system of karate it is all about heel down.

In my opinion I don't really notice more or less power but I feel more stable with heel down. Sometimes when throwing this punch people "run into it" and you end up going backward while they get hit hard.

I notice with heel down this doesn't really happen, however with heel and the weigh being more on the ball of the foot I feel more mobile and quick. (As quick as a 200 pound guy can be of course).

Have any of you been taught both ways and if you have which do you prefer?
We tend to like the heel down, for stability. That's true in nearly all our stances, and we sometimes use that (as you described) to create a feeling of a "wall" people can run into as we finish a technique. Mind you, that's at what I call "picture frames" - those points in a technique where you'd take a photo. In transition, we will sometimes use heels-up (even for strikes, if they happen in transition) for the higher mobility.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,255
Reaction score
4,964
Location
San Francisco
A friend of mine posted this on his facebook page. Not sure how good the study is but it is an interesting read.

Study finds that heel-down posture in great apes and humans confers a fighting advantage
Well, without having read the entire study and their parameters and controls and whatnot, I will say that limb proportion for a modern human is such that being on all fours is awkward for most activities, which would include striking downward. Looks to me like the photos show people down on their knees, which is an awkward position to be in for many activities. Great apes have a different limb proportion so they are still on their feet and not down on their knees when knuckle-walking, and being in that posture is MUCH less awkward for them than for humans. Early human ancestors would have had different limb proportions from modern humans as well, so I'm not sure how this theory would hold up, in terms of human evolution. Early human ancestors and apes of any kind, do not walk around on their knees. Whatever their limb proportions, and whether they are bipedal or quadrupedal, they are on their feet, not their knees. People did not evolve from moving on their knees to moving on their feet. So conducting the study with people doing activities while on their knees strikes me as very problematic for the study.
 

marques

Master Black Belt
Joined
Jun 7, 2015
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
382
Location
Essex, UK
In Muay Thai the rear leg is heel up, by default.
In my self-defence system, the weight was 'never' on the heels even if they look touching the ground.
But I think I would rather use heel down for a reverse punch (or any other strike in a sideways position).
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,107
Reaction score
4,560
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
which do you prefer?
The question should not be "which" but "why".

1. Heel down - your base is bigger and you are more stable.
2. Heel up - your back foot is ready to slide forward and you have better mobility.

One's PRO is the others' CON. When your opponent is moving back and you try to punch him, whether your back heel should be up or down depends on the distance between you and your opponent. May be you just lift your back heel up and slide forward for 3 inch, your punch can land on your opponent. If you don't, your punch may just miss that 3 inches.
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
Well then I hate to say this your instructor doesn't that seem to really know his stuff since in American kenpo it's always been heel down it's even said so in ed parkers book and if you read lee wedlakes book lessons with ed Parker. Parker always taught it heel down
It doesn't matter if he the guy is backing up, Mr. Kenpo Expert. :cool:
 
Top