Flying Crane
Sr. Grandmaster
I am starting this thread due to another thread currently going on in Martialtalk's sister forum, Kenpotalk. I would like to hear some input from Non-Kenpoists, regarding some comments that were posted over in KT. Regardless of what art other than kenpo you study, I would appreciate your input. Kenpo people are, of course, also welcome to comment, but I really want to see some different perspectives.
This particular thread on KT deals with being "Black Dot focused" vs. "White Dot Focused", as an art. A definition was posted, taken from Ed Parker's Encyclopedia of Kenpo (a book which I have not read, but is popular among various branches of the kenpo tree). That definition is as follows:
Black Dot Focus: Our Kenpo concept of focus. We visualize a black dot on a white background, representing total awareness. Our concern is not only with maximizing power, but in protection as well.
White Dot Focus: In this concept of focus one visualizes a white dot on a black background representing unawareness. All styles and systems that primarily stress linear motion conform to this concept. Their concern is with the target, and with maximizing power-not protection.
My interest lies mostly with the defininion of White Dot Focus, and the accusation that this, as an implied inferior approach, is what most other arts, especially linear arts, are. It implies that kenpo is superior in approach as an art, and that kenpo somehow has a monopoly on total awareness.
Personally, as a kenpo guy, I don't buy this assertion. I felt it would be fair for the non-kenpoists to weigh in on this debate. I look forward to hearing what you all might have to say.
The thread on Kenpotalk is found here, for anyone interested in reviewing what has been said so far:
http://www.kenpotalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4165
Thanks, everyone.
This particular thread on KT deals with being "Black Dot focused" vs. "White Dot Focused", as an art. A definition was posted, taken from Ed Parker's Encyclopedia of Kenpo (a book which I have not read, but is popular among various branches of the kenpo tree). That definition is as follows:
Black Dot Focus: Our Kenpo concept of focus. We visualize a black dot on a white background, representing total awareness. Our concern is not only with maximizing power, but in protection as well.
White Dot Focus: In this concept of focus one visualizes a white dot on a black background representing unawareness. All styles and systems that primarily stress linear motion conform to this concept. Their concern is with the target, and with maximizing power-not protection.
My interest lies mostly with the defininion of White Dot Focus, and the accusation that this, as an implied inferior approach, is what most other arts, especially linear arts, are. It implies that kenpo is superior in approach as an art, and that kenpo somehow has a monopoly on total awareness.
Personally, as a kenpo guy, I don't buy this assertion. I felt it would be fair for the non-kenpoists to weigh in on this debate. I look forward to hearing what you all might have to say.
The thread on Kenpotalk is found here, for anyone interested in reviewing what has been said so far:
http://www.kenpotalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4165
Thanks, everyone.