"classic" martial art vs "modern" martial arts

"Dude, read into it however you like. I don't do martial arts with the intention of getting into a fight. I just don't."

That you think "the combat side of martial arts" is the same as intentionally getting into fights demonstrates how cunningly you mischaracterised what I said, if not for a lack of reading comprehension, then sheer stupidity.
 
That you think "the combat side of martial arts" is the same as intentionally getting into fights demonstrates how cunningly you mischaracterised what I said, if not for a lack of reading comprehension, then sheer stupidity.
No. Please.

Do tell me what you mean by a Combative side of martial arts that isn't about beating people up.

"As for the "beating people up" part... yeah... I can't say I've ever considered that a requisite for any martial art I've trained in. Ever."
 
That you think "the combat side of martial arts" is the same as intentionally getting into fights demonstrates how cunningly you mischaracterised what I said, if not for a lack of reading comprehension, then sheer stupidity.
As far as intention and intentional. A lot of people train martial arts with the intention that they will use that in a fight.

But may not intentionally cause fights.
 
Do you mean like bokken vs. mma? I’d put my money on the bokken. Looking forward to seeing some smashed skulls there.
I wouldn’t. It’s just a stick and after the maximum momentum of the stick is ā€˜spent’ it’s pretty benign. Plus getting in close to someone swinging it, renders it very cumbersome indeed! I imagine that once it’s swung and misses, a good MMAer would rush in at you and pull your head off.
 
I wouldn’t. It’s just a stick and after the maximum momentum of the stick is ā€˜spent’ it’s pretty benign. Plus getting in close to someone swinging it, renders it very cumbersome indeed! I imagine that once it’s swung and misses, a good MMAer would rush in at you and pull your head off.
I think you would have about one shot to get a strike in with the bokken. If you miss or don't hit the guy hard enough, you are done. šŸ’€
 
I imagine that once it’s swung and misses, a good MMAer would rush in at you and pull your head off.

I think you would have about one shot to get a strike in with the bokken. If you miss or don't hit the guy hard enough, you are done.
No experience in bokken art, but I believe in sword art a second cut returning on the same line is common. This could make it difficult for the empty hander to close in to counter. The length of the weapon gives the experienced wielder an advantage, not only in distance, but in the resulting time it would take for the opponent to close.

It's true that at close range a bokken will not be as effective as a sharpened sword, but with some footwork controlling distance this may be mitigated a little. Also, the empty-handed fighter will likely have little experience in defending/attacking against a long weapon. While a long stick may not mean certain victory, I don't think the case is as hopeless as you make it out to be.
 
The length of the weapon gives the experienced wielder an advantage,
When one trains "knife against spear" 2 men form, he is training how to use knife to deal with spear. He is not training the other way around. To be able to use spear to deal with knife is by default.

 
When a modern MA girl challenges a TMA girl, the modern MA girl brings her boxing gloves. The TMA girl brings her Guan Dao. They may have different definition of "challenge".

boxing_girl.webp

Robin_Guan_Dao.webp
 
I wouldn’t. It’s just a stick and after the maximum momentum of the stick is ā€˜spent’ it’s pretty benign. Plus getting in close to someone swinging it, renders it very cumbersome indeed! I imagine that once it’s swung and misses, a good MMAer would rush in at you and pull your head off.
Didnt Musashi duel using bokken? Didnt he smash beyond repair the arm of the heir apparent of some famous Daimyo? Didnt he defeat Sasaki Kojiro with a carved piece of wooden oar?
 
No experience in bokken art, but I believe in sword art a second cut returning on the same line is common. This could make it difficult for the empty hander to close in to counter. The length of the weapon gives the experienced wielder an advantage, not only in distance, but in the resulting time it would take for the opponent to close.
Oh with a real sword, everyone’d be sashimi!
It's true that at close range a bokken will not be as effective as a sharpened sword, but with some footwork controlling distance this may be mitigated a little.
It’s a stick - nothing special.

I was surprised to learn that the Japanese only refer to them as ā€˜bokutÅā€™ since a bokken would have a straight ā€˜blade’.
Also, the empty-handed fighter will likely have little experience in defending/attacking against a long weapon.
Then they’re not worth their salt.
While a long stick may not mean certain victory, I don't think the case is as hopeless as you make it out to be.
All things being equal, any tool would likely be better than the empty hand. I’d rather have a bokutō than ā€˜koroddy hands’!
 
Ok. If your weapons system doesn't pressure test. Are you any more competent with it than an untrained person?

If your unarmed system is comparatively bad. Why is your weapons system good?
 
Ok. If your weapons system doesn't pressure test. Are you any more competent with it than an untrained person?

If your unarmed system is comparatively bad. Why is your weapons system good?
Ok I haven’t been in any gunfights lately, so I haven’t pressure tested it. Am I more competent than an untrained person? Good question, I believe so because untrained people don’t even know how to properly operate firearms. All things considered, regular consistent practice and familiarity weigh fairly heavy in competent firearms use. Shooting is certainly a perishable skill, much like other martial arts. People who may have trained once upon a time won’t be nearly as effective as a person who trains several times a week. This one I can and have put to the test. Bottom line is that I have won multiple long range competitions. I would love to see the walk on that never fired a gun come beat me at 1000 yds with 3 different winds between us and the target. I have bested tab wearing snipers at this in field conditions, not at a range, no spotting scope, no kestrel, no B.S.
 
Didnt Musashi duel using bokken? Didnt he smash beyond repair the arm of the heir apparent of some famous Daimyo? Didnt he defeat Sasaki Kojiro with a carved piece of wooden oar?
Are you seriously comparing anyone who currently trains in a sword art to Musashi? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Edit: Just to be more clear, you started with @Gyakuto and then jumped to Musashi. What struck my funny bone is that, Musashi is really, really dead. I don't think he'd do very well in a duel, at all.

Which is pretty much the point made earlier, that the classical/traditional training model looks for validation in the past. He was effective, ergo my training is effective. Where modern styles look forward. My students are effective, ergo my training is effective.
 
Last edited:
Then they’re not worth their salt.
A classic Monty Python sketch... well, I guess they're all classics at this point. But still.
All things being equal, any tool would likely be better than the empty hand. I’d rather have a bokutō than ā€˜koroddy hands’!

Unless the bad guy takes it from you and bonks you on the head with it.
 
Ok. If your weapons system doesn't pressure test. Are you any more competent with it than an untrained person?

If your unarmed system is comparatively bad. Why is your weapons system good?
Separate note, I’m curious if you think average traditional hobbyist mid level belt level kata guy with limited sparring experience would fare better or worse than an untrained regular guy? Neither one has ever been in a real fight. To be fair I don’t really have a dog in this fight. I’m not a big kata/ form guy. My teachers knew them, but saw them as review rather than functional as teaching methods in and of themselves. I see value in that respect, and as a way to teach flow and speed in execution. This is only possible and useful after the basic foundations are established and very strong. Lots of flowery kata or forms in a style is suspect in my opinion. I don’t think a form teaches anything about fighting. Fighting is learned by fighting. I don’t need to kill things to learn to shoot proficiently. But I do need to regularly practice a set of skills in repetition similar to a kata.
 
Back
Top