For once or twice anyway, I can only agree.
In the first place, the whole idea is pretty offensive. As was asked, why in the world would anybody WANT a black belt in an art they've never heard of, let alone practiced?
In the second--if the argument is that there's no difference, so the cross-ranking is OK--well, then why does the art of, "kenpo jiu-jitsu," even still exist?
In the third, sorry, not falling for the old, "If you weren't a doubting thomas and you had an open mind and you were decent people, you'd all sign up,"
In the fourth--funny that no details (rationale, cost) are available ion the website itself; you have to call...
Now if we're all wet about this, here's something simple to prove it: get on and post, a) your exact reasons for this...offer; b) what it is YOU stand to gain from it; c) the costs involved. It's what you'd do, if you weren't a doubting thomas and you had an open mind. Then boy, will we look silly.
I'm actually working on a theory--if a fifth degree and a fifth degree get together, they can add the exponents and acquire the right to promote each other to ninth.
But as noted:
"You are being bashed for offering a Black Belt in your style to someone who is trained and certified in something different without any personal interraction with that person. That significantly diminishes the value of the Black Belts you offer and calls in question your motives and integrity."
Incidentally, shouldn't it tell you something that you're running into pretty much the same universal response from a lot of different people on different forums? I know the KenpoNet crowd was...less than flattering in response.