Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There not two seperate arts, being taught. It has always been one complete art.
While everything you say is true, the overwhelming factors were even more basic. Manipulation skills are not easy, nor are there very many competent teachers who can teach it on a mass marketing level. Any kid can walk a person through a striking routine, (no matter competent, or not), but base level manipulations have to be shown to actually work over hypothetical strikes, and the commercial system never had the manpower to teach it sir.Kenpo has always incorporated JuJutsu into its arsenal. Just look at the influence of the Hawaiian islands on Kenpo as we know it in America. Masters of Danzan ryu, Lima Lama, Lua and Arnis were extremely influential on Kenpo in its formative years. The 1970s to 90s saw the emergence of commercial kenpo, which predominantly focussed on the striking aspects of Kenpo. I wondered for quite some time why the Nage-waza/Ne-waza wasn't taught in most commercial kenpo schools as Mr Parker had knowledge of Judo. I could be wrong but I came up with a hypothesis. In commercial kenpo space is an issue, you want to keep your school overheads low and if you're paying rent by the square foot it can get expensive. You have to allow each pair of students more room to move when practising throwing arts, so by concetrating on striking, you can fit more students in your studio space. Many students in a small area equals more profits. This is just my reasoning however, but as Mr Parker was a genius in business as well as martial arts, I'm sure this crossed his mind.
Kenpo and JuJutsu have always be taught side by side and most of the time are two sides of the same coin.
Doc, your logic makes alot more sense than my previous post. I didn't take into account that various JuJutsu kihon waza could be taught without the necessity to throw, but because of their nature, they create extreme pain for the uke. In such cases little space is needed, but the discomfort of the student would cause business to suffer.While everything you say is true, the overwhelming factors were even more basic. Manipulation skills are not easy, nor are there very many competent teachers who can teach it on a mass marketing level. Any kid can walk a person through a striking routine, (no matter competent, or not), but base level manipulations have to be shown to actually work over hypothetical strikes, and the commercial system never had the manpower to teach it sir.
Add to that the discomfort of functioning joint locks and throws, and you turn away a significant amount of business. Also the necessity of having special flooring and mats, were also a factor. Commercial Kenpo can be taught on any surface, but throwing, grappling, and ground explorations demand special flooring. All in all, it was never conducive to business.
Doc, your logic makes alot more sense than my previous post. I didn't take into account that various JuJutsu kihon waza could be taught without the necessity to throw, but because of their nature, they create extreme pain for the uke. In such cases little space is needed, but the discomfort of the student would cause business to suffer.
While we are on the subject, I viewed a couple of u-tube videos posted by you and noticed that you were using filipino hubud as a drill. I know that control manipulation is taught indepth in SL-4. Were these aspects taught to you by Mr Parker, or did you recieve them from your Danzen ryu teachers (control manipulation) and other filipino martial arts teachers (hubud/sensitivity drills).
Surely it could be stated that you are teaching an advanced form of Kenpo JuJutsu. To state that you teach SL-4 would suggest that the former three sub levels are being negated. Do you now concentrate entirely on control manipulation and sensitivity drills, or do you teach it along side the standard Kenpo technique syllabus?
Dom
Doc,Martial Science University
American Kenpo and SubLevel Four Kenpo
Combat Ranges (V-1.2)
By
Ron Chapél, Ph.D.
I. Distance One:
“Out of Reach” (no contact)
SubLevel One:
A. Psychology of Confrontation Theory
II. Distance Two:
“Within Reach” (no contact)
SubLevel Two:
A. Psychology of Confrontation Theory
B. Spatial Distortion Concepts
III. Distance Three:
“Contact Penetration” (Peripheral Contact)
SubLevel Three:
A. Psychology of Confrontation Theory
B. Spatial Distortion Concepts
C. Contact Manipulation
D. Visual Cortex Disruption
E. Nerve Cavity Strikes
IV. Distance Four:
“Control Manipulation” (Aural Contact)
SubLevel Four:
A. Psychology of Confrontation
B. Spatial Distortion Concepts
C. Contact Manipulations
D. Visual Cortex Disruption
E. Nerve Cavity activation
F. Energy Disruption Concepts
G. Kenpo Control Manipulation
H. Nerve Cavity Strikes
I. Kenpo Pressure-Point Activations
J. Control Manipulations
Doc,
I'm not going to even pretend that I understand evrything written in the above post. I am more of a visual learner and even then, it takes intense study and time for me to "get it". I've never been known for my academic abilities.
What I do surmise is that SL-4 is a complete martial science unto itself, and a far cry from the "commercial Kenpo" practiced by many. It seems that the art transcends the cultural differences found in most arts and assimilates the logical methods found in all. The "Borg" of martial arts....scary.
what is it that makes these 2 compliment each other so well ?
Taught correctly, they are parts of a bigger whole.
so Doc, what you are saying is people sacrifice the art for the better of THEIR business??? shouldn't it be the other way around??? I am lucky to have found a instructor that teaches the "commercial" system, but is a stickler for all the jiu-jitsu... she was a good friend and brief student of the late Mr.German that helped her pull this aspect out of the kenpo curriculum
Hi folks!what is it that makes these 2 compliment each other so well ?
Hi folks!so Doc, what you are saying is people sacrifice the art for the better of THEIR business??? shouldn't it be the other way around??? I am lucky to have found a instructor that teaches the "commercial" system, but is a stickler for all the jiu-jitsu... she was a good friend and brief student of the late Mr.German that helped her pull this aspect out of the kenpo curriculum
Hi folks!our teacher(myself and gixxershane) has a good way of describing why the jiu-jitsu was lost as part of the commercial kenpo system. If you punch someone in the face, whether it is done properly or not, it is still going to hurt. You may break a bone in your hand, or bust your knuckles, but the person on the receiving end is still going to feel it. If you are sitting there playing with someone's wrist trying to get a wrist lock, they're just going to slap you around silly. Of course, she said this much more eloquently than I just did, but the point is, you can teach someone to throw a punch and whether or not they execute is properly, chances are it's still going to hurt. If you teach someone half-assed jiu-jitsu that, you as an instructor have little understanding of, they're never going to be able to apply it properly in a self defense situation, as there is little room for error. I am thankful to have found a teacher who understands the jiu-jitsu, and makes it a point to teach us it properly. Twisted twig is a perfect example where we learn the attack properly, from different angles, and on different planes before learning how to defend against it. I think it is just a case of, what people don't understand they dismiss.