SenseiHitman
Orange Belt
they = police obviously,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm curious why you disliked my post when it seems you agree with me.Yes, it is scary the police do not know the law they only enforce it.
Then the public is at the mercy of a police officers mood at the time, instead of them turning the case over to a judge and jury to decide.they = police obviously,
The police (and the prosecutors in some cases) are the ones who make the decision whether to pursue charges in the US, too. That's nothing odd. As for your comment of "innocence or guilt", nobody said anything about determining guilt - just determining when it's an apparent clear case of self-defense. If you want all of those to go to court, I suspect you aren't considering the impact to all those who defend themselves, nor the cost of all those court cases.Then the public is at the mercy of a police officers mood at the time, instead of them turning the case over to a judge and jury to decide.
I can't think of a single jurisdiction where one can use deadly-force in self-defense and not get in trouble for it, except when being imminently threatened with deadly force yourself.
Who is "they"? "They" must have a lot of power to determine innocence or guilt. Kinda scary.
If you use deadly force, you WILL be arrested. The important thing is to understand the distinction between being arrested and being convicted. You'll be arrested because the police will need to detain you for questioning during the initial phase of the investigation. You may never actually be charged with a crime and they may simply let you go after getting things sorted out. In any case, my advice is to ALWAYS "lawyer up" (request an attorney and refuse to answer any questions they ask until your attorney arrives).Well, when the police are unsure they take everyone in and sort it out later they cant just take the winners word.
Yes, it is scary the police do not know the law they only enforce it.
Yes, it is scary the police do not know the law they only enforce it.
LOL!! How can they enforce it if they don't know it?
Are you outside the US?
In the USA, officers are trained to be familiar with the laws they enforce. You can't expect a cop to be a walking encyclopedia of the law (attorneys and judges can't even be that), but they are familiar with the laws and they have the means to look up a law to see what it specifically says. They used to carry criminal code books (municipal code, state code, etc.) now they can access that from the computer in their vehicles.
If/when you get a ticket from a cop in the USA, look at it. You'll see the reference number of the law you broke on the ticket.
Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
Well the point of this thread is self defense is self defense unless I'm cowboy or there are cowboys shooting some one in back for trying to runway or shooting some on on property it should be self defense.
If there is forcible entry and the burglar got shot in the house you should not have go through all the red tape trying prove in court why they should not send you to prison. And courts trying rip you apart treating you as a criminal.
The critics of those liberal countries like UK, Australia and Canada is it is terrible. That you are arrested and have to prove to the court you could not hide or runway and treating you as a criminal.
A system in Canada, UK, Australia how can you have proper self defense if guns have to be locked in safe.
If it prevents you from being raped or murdered than yes. However, deadly force in the USA is only allowed in the most extreme situations such as if you're in danger of death or grave bodily harm. Most of us hope to never be in such a situation. However, as I said you can only use deadly force in the situations I mentioned above. You can't kill somebody for slapping or shoving you.You can defend yourself in every nation on the planet. There is nothing special about the US there at all, other than you guys seem to have a love of, and preference for, lethal responses. And if you think that is "beautiful", well…
You can't carry a weapon for self defence. If there is one laying around you can use it.
The idea is you are not supposed to be walking around with the intent to hurt people.
If its criminals being stopped I don't see why they couldn't be carrying guns. There might have laws against owning and carrying guns but criminals don't obey the law, that's what makes them criminals.Considering how many guns there are in the country probably not so bad ( there are many things to factor in I imagine, poverty, gangs, social conditions, terrorist attacks etc different places having different problems plus a justified fear that anyone being stopped by the police can be armed whereas it's unlikely here, at least armed with a gun anyway),
With that train of thought you can say police walk around with the intent to hurt people since most police officers in all countries do carry weapons of some sort.
They do. They intend to use force on people and that will hurt those people. We empower them with that role. And because we empower them with that role. We also place restrictions on their behaviour that an average person does not have.
If it prevents you from being raped or murdered than yes. However, deadly force in the USA is only allowed in the most extreme situations such as if you're in danger of death or grave bodily harm. Most of us hope to never be in such a situation. However, as I said you can only use deadly force in the situations I mentioned above. You can't kill somebody for slapping or shoving you.
If its criminals being stopped I don't see why they couldn't be carrying guns. There might have laws against owning and carrying guns but criminals don't obey the law, that's what makes them criminals.
On the contrary a police officer can do lots of stuff an average person can't. If anything, average people are more restricted than police officers.