OH Man – A new low

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,359
Reaction score
9,522
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
:mad: I am not fraud busting since I am not giving out names but I am just not happy about this and I had to get it off of my chest.

My first sifu, who I have mentioned before in reference to changing for the o-mighty dollar, has sunk to a new low and I deleted most of what I wrote, before posting, in a effort to keep it short and avoid a long rant and frankly after writing it all out, I no longer really cared :shrug:.

My first sifu, who learned virtually all of his Chinese Martial Arts at a Chinese Physical Education University (except for 2 forms; 1 Chen, 1 Tongbei), who knew no traditional Taijiquan forms (except for a very old version of Chen Laojia), who did not like to be called master or sifu and preferred being called by his first name (he is now a Grand Master by the way :rolleyes:)

Now is apparently not only a master of multiple traditional Taiji family styles but he is now a master of old Yang style forms from Yang Luchan, Yang Banhou and Yang Jianhou that the Yang family doesn’t even know :disgust: and you can be to for $44.95 per DVD for about 15 DVDs :disgust:. Oh and if you what the Yang Chengfu version that too is only $44.95 per DVD for 3 DVDs :disgust:.

Well I guess what CZL said about him must be true, “he must be a Grand Master, he knows over 100 styles” :rolleyes:


Eh whatever :cool:

Thanks, I feel better now. :asian:
 
Last edited:
OP
Xue Sheng

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,359
Reaction score
9,522
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
Thanks

In China he is a Gym Teacher...

In America he is now a Grandmaster of 10 different CMA styles... :rolleyes:
Sadly he now believes he actually is a Grandmaster of all those styles and now he is even teaching versions of styles that the families they are from don't even know.

The sad part is that when I first started training with him it was a pretty good school for basic sport Sanshou and Wushu stuff and he use to let a bunch of us from multiple styles get together and use his school for free on Saturday afternoons for sparing... now...well... everything is all about $$$ and most of what he teaches he did not learn from any Sifu. :disgust:
 

ggg214

Blue Belt
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
295
Reaction score
10
Location
China
Thanks

In China he is a Gym Teacher...

In America he is now a Grandmaster of 10 different CMA styles... :rolleyes:
Sadly he now believes he actually is a Grandmaster of all those styles and now he is even teaching versions of styles that the families they are from don't even know.

The sad part is that when I first started training with him it was a pretty good school for basic sport Sanshou and Wushu stuff and he use to let a bunch of us from multiple styles get together and use his school for free on Saturday afternoons for sparing... now...well... everything is all about $$$ and most of what he teaches he did not learn from any Sifu. :disgust:

the same thing is happening in china.
when CmA meets money, everything has changed. they pay more attention in business, not in CMA.
that's why i don't attend any classes in Wushu center, i'd like to find teachers in pulbic parks.
 

grydth

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
150
Location
Upstate New York.
On the positive side of the balance sheet, he was at least able to communicate a long lasting respect for the true CMA to you before this unfortunate change. If you consider that, some of the bitterness will subside.
 

wushuguy

Purple Belt
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
378
Reaction score
7
Location
NYC
is what he teaches at least useful for those who learn from him? While some people may make very exaggerated claims, perhaps there is still usefulness in the techniques he's teaching the students? some people need to feel better by being called a "grand master" who give such titles anyway... if self-appointed, well then one needs to check reality, but if many high skilled martial artists from different arts call him a "grand master" there might be merit to the title.

Anyway, although such path isn't the way we may agree with, hope his students can still gain something.
 
OP
Xue Sheng

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,359
Reaction score
9,522
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
is what he teaches at least useful for those who learn from him? While some people may make very exaggerated claims, perhaps there is still usefulness in the techniques he's teaching the students? some people need to feel better by being called a "grand master" who give such titles anyway... if self-appointed, well then one needs to check reality, but if many high skilled martial artists from different arts call him a "grand master" there might be merit to the title.

Anyway, although such path isn't the way we may agree with, hope his students can still gain something.

There is no such animal as a living Grandmaster in China that is a title of compliment or that shows great skill. He was called a Grand Master (da sifu) by one of the Chen family once which translates to fake in mainland Chinese terms. So if many high level masters from mainland China call him a grandmaster, particularly in their native tongue, they are being sarcastic. There is NO living grandmaster title in traditional Chinese Martial Arts and it has been my experience that the title Grandmaster is not often applied to even those that have passed away in TCMA circles. Those that use the title either have no clue to the culture or do it for the benefit of westerners since we are all so impressed by title.

What he teaches these days is sloppy form with no apps that is pretty much useless and he then gives those he teaches certificates (for a price) that they feel give them the right to go off and teach what they learned and there is no reason they shouldn't certificate or not. It is however not anything that should be taught to someone else as Chinese Martial Arts.

Most of what he teaches and claims mastery of today he learned form VCDs he bought in China. I know what he learned in China and the majority of what he teaches today he did not learn there

EDIT

Look here
 

wushuguy

Purple Belt
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
378
Reaction score
7
Location
NYC
I see. thanks for clearing that up for me. I didn't realize his "mastery" was as such. I never heard of the title grandmaster in CMA either, so thought my knowledge might just be limited. I just knew that there are some exceptional martial artists others call them "da xia" but that might just be in the movies.
 

SifuAbel

White Belt
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What he teaches these days is sloppy form with no apps that is pretty much useless http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=76247

This is really the important part. That his skill was sub par to begin with.

If you are pretty much at a high level in a comparable style, with good basics and mechanics, then learning another routine isn't that big a deal. And the reverse is true, as in this case.
 
OP
Xue Sheng

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,359
Reaction score
9,522
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
This is really the important part. That his skill was sub par to begin with.

Actually for what he learned in China his skill was pretty good and he did teach it pretty well in the beginning he was a stickler for form and claimed to know only what he learned in China. It was later that he discovered that if you are not as concerned about getting the forms right and don't care about hard training then you get a BUNCH more students. Then of course you get VCDs of the forms your students want and learn them form VCD and then claim mastery and get a LOT MORE students. Of course not one of them could fight there way out of a wet paper bag with what he taught them (he does not teach any sanshou anymore) and his students forms are awful, but they think they are great because they think he is great and gives them piles of certificates (for a price) based on his greatness to tell them they are great.

What truly upsets me about all of this is that he was not bad many years ago for what it was and it claimed to be nothing other than it was. He certainly did not have the understanding of taiji that my taiji Sifu has nor the understanding of Xingyiquan that my last Xingyiquan Sifu had nor the understanding of Bagua, Shaolin or any other form that he taught back then as a legitimate Sifu of that style would have but he was not at all bad for the forms he learned in China and Sanshou. But as he once told me, he can't train people in America like he would people in China because he would have no students. At that point I just thought he was going to keep the school like it was, I was training his Old Chen form then and it was pretty cool and like I said it started with 60 students and when it was all over there were only 6 of us left.

However after that the bogus taiji forms appeared and changing of other forms to make it easier started and the contracts, prices went up and copious certificates as well. And were he was once a stickler for form he was now not really all that concerned about it, close was good enough, and rough worked. Things went downhill form there and I left after that. Of course there were several discussions, an argument or two and a bringing in of one of his original videos as proof that he was changing things when he was denying it.

I just know what it was like, what he was like and what it is now and what he is like now and it all just makes me rather sad and on occasion, like it did when I started this post, rather angry.

If you are pretty much at a high level in a comparable style, with good basics and mechanics, then learning another routine isn't that big a deal. And the reverse is true, as in this case.

And I do not agree with this in the context of my first Sifu or any other legitimate high level Sifu for that matter, it is a big deal.

My taiji Sifu has been doing Yang style taiji for over 50 years but he could not learn Chen from a video and be a master of it or good enough to teach it nor would he want to (although of all the people out there today with Taiji videos Chen Zhenglei and Chen Xiaowang impress him most). But he most certainly knows the mechanics of taiji.

My Sanda Sifu has been doing Sanda for close to 40 years and he could not get Shaolin videos or Bagua videos of Xingyi videos and go off and teach any of them nor would he, even though he was show Xingyi 12 animal while he was growing up. He is a Sanda Sifu, nothing else, and that is how he sees it and people like my first Sifu are huā quán xìu tǔi" or “xìu huā zhǒu tóu” to him and he has called my first Sifu this more than once.

I have been at Yang Taiji for 18 years, 15 with my Sifu and I would not for a second go off and buy a DVD or a VCD and learn a form from that and then go off and teach it to anyone. I trained Chen for a couple of years, some with Chen Zhenglei and I would not for a second go buy his Videos, learn form them and then go teach Chen.

IMO, I do not care how good you are at any given style a DVD (VCD) is at best a supplement for training with a real Sifu not a substitute, not a marketing ploy to gain more students, just a supplement. But in many cases things are a lot more complicated than a VCD or DVD makes it look and on occasion the person who made the DVD has changed a form so he can tell if a person actually learned from him or from one of his videos.

My first Sifu was rather well trained in Modern Wushu, competition forms and sanshou. He is/was also a rather good mimic and I saw this when he copied a traditional Yang style video and then claimed he learned it in China and taught it, but that does not justify learning multiple other styles from a video, claiming mastery, lying about where he learned them, charging large sums of money for them and bilking the public.

I honestly don’t think about this much anymore and I truly don’t let it get to me much these days either and going to his webpage of late has usually been done for comic relief but when I saw his new DVDs that “taught” Yang style forms that, if they exist, are so rare I doubt any claim to someone actually knowing them, forms that not even the current Yang family heads know, I got a bit disgusted and posted it.

And there is more but I am tired of this and fraud busting is not what I want to do, I just wanted to get this off my chest in hopes that it would go away.
 

zepedawingchun

Black Belt
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
582
Reaction score
17
Location
Moore, SC
:mad: My first sifu, who learned virtually all of his Chinese Martial Arts at a Chinese Physical Education University (except for 2 forms; 1 Chen, 1 Tongbei), who knew no traditional Taijiquan forms (except for a very old version of Chen Laojia), who did not like to be called master or sifu and preferred being called by his first name (he is now a Grand Master by the way :rolleyes:)

Now is apparently not only a master of multiple traditional Taiji family styles but he is now a master of old Yang style forms from Yang Luchan, Yang Banhou and Yang Jianhou that the Yang family doesn’t even know :disgust:

. . . . .“he must be a Grand Master, he knows over 100 styles” :rolleyes:

And he didn't even have to take a plane ride to do it. That statement pertains to something my Sifu says, 'Lots of martial arts guys leave Hong Kong a sifu and arrive in the USA, get off the plane and now have the title of Grand Master.
 
OP
Xue Sheng

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,359
Reaction score
9,522
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
It's almost like he's Count Dooku and you're Qui-Gon Jinn.

I want to make this perfectly clear.... at no point were there any light sabers involved :jedi1: :D :jediduel:
But of course.. you realize.... I now I have to figure out who Darth Maul is :D

And he didn't even have to take a plane ride to do it. That statement pertains to something my Sifu says, 'Lots of martial arts guys leave Hong Kong a sifu and arrive in the USA, get off the plane and now have the title of Grand Master.

Sadly that is all to true.
 

Latest Discussions

Top