Let me orient my posts a little better, then...
I posted a negative attitude toward detractors of martial arts practice who equate such practice with "evil" elements of their religion. Then, with spectacularly poor information on the real history of a given martial art, as well as a completely incorrect idea of the impact a religion (not theirs) has had on that given martial art, they begin a tirade against martial arts practice based solely on that accumulated bad information. Instead of any particular person to whom my comments ran afoul addressing my comments publicly and refuting them, they instead remained behind the scenes and anonymously dinged my reputation points in an attempt to illustrate their disapproval (as if the number of reputation points genuinely matters to me).
I would like to see, personally, someone make a detailed and logical argument against martial practice. That someone, however, should understand the real history of martial arts, as opposed to the popularly held and wholly incorrect "karate came from monks at the Shaolin temple" Hollywood version. Further, I would like to see specific and extensive citations of the prohibitions against martial practice as set forth in their religious practice. Then we can compare notes side by side and evaluate their position.
Since it is the detractors who are attempting to prove their position, the burden of evidence resides with them. Failure to document their position, relying intead on "my pastor says," or other third person commentary, fails the common sense test... If a person subscribes to a belief, then that person should be able to document the specifics of their belief. If they can't, they don't believe, they allow others to believe for them...
Enjoy.