We are blessed to have a central authority where folks with many years of technical ability are studying, researching, and promoting TKD.
Sorry, but I just do not see why a 'central authority' is necessary for a martial art, much less a 'blessing'. In terms of technical development and street applicability, why does TKD need a top-down mega-organization closely tied, as Terry has repeatedly pointed out, to the progressive sportification of what was originally a battlefield-tested combat art—especially when neither Japanese nor Okinawan karate, nor any of the hundreds of Chinese styles, nor the Oceanic MAs, have such a 'central authority'. The revival of karate's combat orientation is one of the most exciting developments in the MAs during the past decade and a half, and that was certainly not the work of any 'central authority', but rather the result of the initiative of gifted individual practitioners involved in informal networks of shared information and training with practitioners from other arts, in places like the UK, Australia and the US. When has any 'central authority' been distinguished for creative innovation? In talking about the reasons why none of the great Italian Renaissance calligraphers were Vatican scribes, one historian noted that 'art does not flourish in a bureaucratic environment', and I think that's a pretty sound observation across the board. For my money, the work of Stuart Anslow and Simon O'Neill on realistic combat applications of TKD hyungs is pretty much the most revitalizing development in TKD in decades, and the KKW had
nothing to do with that.
TKD is an evolving art, it is not stagnant.
Exactly what has the role of the KKW been in the 'evolution' of TKD, then?
I've pointed out people and movements which represent real innovation in TKD as a
combat art—exactly what has the KKW contributed in that direction? So far as I can tell, the KKW's business is standardization and certification—not exactly the forge of new breakthroughs in any MA, eh? So just how, apart from (the
illusion of) uniform oversight in curriculum and ranking standards, has the KKW promoted the evolution of the art?