Zombocalypse
Blue Belt
Which training philosophy do you adhere to? “All out” or “Marathon”?
I wanted to ask this question in a bodybuilding forum, but the forum I frequented had a bunch of bad apples in it. I didn’t want them to ruin a perfectly good topic…
So instead, I’ll ask this question to martial artists instead of bodybuilders…
Let me start by quoting Charles Poliquin with regards to “training frequency”. Read below.
However, in the practice of strength training in the sporting world, especially with elite athletes, there are conflicting schools of thought on training frequency. For example, Rick Weil, who did in excess of triple his bodyweight in the bench press recommends one session per week per muscle group. While at the other end of the spectrum, 9 to 12 weekly sessions are common on European weightlifting teams. In fact, some of these teams would train the hip and knee extensors in short sessions of up to 4 to 5 times a day!
Obviously, in the world of strength sports (bodybuilding, powerlifting, weightlifting,), there are varying methods and philosophies to the way each athlete conducts his training. I, for example, have had great success with high-frequency lifting. Others think it’s a crazy idea, but it worked for me. Then you have guys like Charles Poliquin who adhere to the “less is more” philosophy of doing the least amount of work for the best results.
One of the people in the “less is more” category is the legendary Doug Hepburn, who was once dubbed as “The Grandfather of Modern Powerlifting”. In his autobiography, Strongman: The Doug Hepburn Story, he outlined in great detail his weight training system. In it, he gives you the option to choose how often you train, as low as twice a week to as high as only six times a week. Six-times-a-week weightlifting is very common with your average gym rat. It’s nothing special and nothing extreme. But here is where it gets even more nonextreme…
You are to exercise a particular muscle group no more than three times a week.
Again, that is common with a lot of gym rats, but it’s absolutely laughable by real weightlifting standards. You take that to John Broz’s (a great weightlifting coach) gym and he’ll call you a pussy.
And yet, Doug became one of the strongest steroid-free weightlifters in history, rivaling the likes of Paul Anderson and Bill Kazmaier.
Here is a result of “extreme” training. See below.
Here is a result of “minimalist” training. See below.
Ed Coan (right above) did a classic linear periodization program that had as little as once a week squatting, and got great results. Pat Mendes (the first video above) did extreme frequencies.
So obviously, either approach works. As far as which is better? That’s a tough call. There are so many variables to talk about and so many elements to consider…
As a martial artist, which one are you in your training?
I once read about how Kimura, a judo legend, trained all day, every day to become as good as he was. And yet, we have more conservative and less aggressive trainees who become just as good with their art.
Obviously, lifting weights and martial arts are not super similar with their training approaches, but please humor me and tell me as a martial artist, which philosophy do you adhere to and why?
Thanks.
I wanted to ask this question in a bodybuilding forum, but the forum I frequented had a bunch of bad apples in it. I didn’t want them to ruin a perfectly good topic…
So instead, I’ll ask this question to martial artists instead of bodybuilders…
Let me start by quoting Charles Poliquin with regards to “training frequency”. Read below.
However, in the practice of strength training in the sporting world, especially with elite athletes, there are conflicting schools of thought on training frequency. For example, Rick Weil, who did in excess of triple his bodyweight in the bench press recommends one session per week per muscle group. While at the other end of the spectrum, 9 to 12 weekly sessions are common on European weightlifting teams. In fact, some of these teams would train the hip and knee extensors in short sessions of up to 4 to 5 times a day!
Obviously, in the world of strength sports (bodybuilding, powerlifting, weightlifting,), there are varying methods and philosophies to the way each athlete conducts his training. I, for example, have had great success with high-frequency lifting. Others think it’s a crazy idea, but it worked for me. Then you have guys like Charles Poliquin who adhere to the “less is more” philosophy of doing the least amount of work for the best results.
One of the people in the “less is more” category is the legendary Doug Hepburn, who was once dubbed as “The Grandfather of Modern Powerlifting”. In his autobiography, Strongman: The Doug Hepburn Story, he outlined in great detail his weight training system. In it, he gives you the option to choose how often you train, as low as twice a week to as high as only six times a week. Six-times-a-week weightlifting is very common with your average gym rat. It’s nothing special and nothing extreme. But here is where it gets even more nonextreme…
You are to exercise a particular muscle group no more than three times a week.
Again, that is common with a lot of gym rats, but it’s absolutely laughable by real weightlifting standards. You take that to John Broz’s (a great weightlifting coach) gym and he’ll call you a pussy.
And yet, Doug became one of the strongest steroid-free weightlifters in history, rivaling the likes of Paul Anderson and Bill Kazmaier.
Here is a result of “extreme” training. See below.
Here is a result of “minimalist” training. See below.
Ed Coan (right above) did a classic linear periodization program that had as little as once a week squatting, and got great results. Pat Mendes (the first video above) did extreme frequencies.
So obviously, either approach works. As far as which is better? That’s a tough call. There are so many variables to talk about and so many elements to consider…
As a martial artist, which one are you in your training?
I once read about how Kimura, a judo legend, trained all day, every day to become as good as he was. And yet, we have more conservative and less aggressive trainees who become just as good with their art.
Obviously, lifting weights and martial arts are not super similar with their training approaches, but please humor me and tell me as a martial artist, which philosophy do you adhere to and why?
Thanks.