OK at the risk of getting yelled at here goes!
Throughout other threads there is post after post from those that
state without reservation that Kenpo is not lacking and it
is all inclussive system. Yet when someone like Mr Mills and others
applies the principles of Kenpo and creates a curriculum with
for example Knives, clubs and ground work this philosophy
is wrong? These same folks start screaming this isnt Kenpo?
Consider within Kenpo, it does have a complete alphabet
of motion and principles that can be applied multi-dimensional.
I believe this to be the core strength of Kenpo.
So let me ask this question, what is Kenpo? Is it the principles
that make Kenpo or is it the sequence of movements?
Last dont yell at me about........here we go again.........if
anything its OFK fault with the new thread!!!
John
Throughout other threads there is post after post from those that
state without reservation that Kenpo is not lacking and it
is all inclussive system. Yet when someone like Mr Mills and others
applies the principles of Kenpo and creates a curriculum with
for example Knives, clubs and ground work this philosophy
is wrong? These same folks start screaming this isnt Kenpo?
Consider within Kenpo, it does have a complete alphabet
of motion and principles that can be applied multi-dimensional.
I believe this to be the core strength of Kenpo.
So let me ask this question, what is Kenpo? Is it the principles
that make Kenpo or is it the sequence of movements?
Last dont yell at me about........here we go again.........if
anything its OFK fault with the new thread!!!
John