Also for the record I've never once said the Bible was 100% accurate. I believe I said it was written by men recalling what they saw heard were told and witnessed. It's inspired by God who guided the authors but as I said a few pages ago the finer details could be lost to time and translation but the main points are correct. Just like if I were to write about my day I may leave out or get minor details wrong but the general story will be correct. Which is also why we study the bible and other texts and documents from the time. To learn the context and meaning. You keep making the claim that I said the Bible is 100% and I never said that. Nothing could ever give you 100% Accra te details other then I guess a video camera recording Jesus himself which we don't have. I do however know the general gist of the Bible to be correct.
I am aware who said what. In this thread, it was oftheheard who claimed that the bible is 100% literal truth. But it's certainly a common enough assertion, and since we were not in a private conversation, my comments were and are less specific than they would be in private.
If your position is that the bible is a text written in the context of the culture it was written for, then I have no argument. I'd say that is pretty much the only rational way to view it.
As a social contract, the 10 commandments make a lot of sense. And there are plenty of other parts of the Christian bible that make sense. Just as there are plenty of things in the Torah and the Koran and the teachings of Odin that make sense.
There is also plenty in each of them that is complete nonsense, or at least complete nonsense in THIS culture.