Bret Hinds
Green Belt
Does anyone have a clue as to what the oldest forms are? or form?something before the 1870's. I know the the influnce of China and Japan but before them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are no uniquely Korean forms which have survived the various invasions and purges Korea has suffered. I have read research that indicated the martial arts we know where practiced by Koreans centuries ago were probably imported from China due to the similarities of weapons found in various archaeological excavations.
One can see the influnce of the Heian Kata's or Pinon's under TKD but what was the influnce of the early form's before the Japanese influnce?Did the Han or Mongel influnce the Northern most Korean school's?The Hwrang schools what was there tie to the other schools? All the best in the arts
Does anyone have a clue as to what the oldest forms are? or form?something before the 1870's. I know the the influnce of China and Japan but before them?
The sometimes disappointing truth is that there are no original korean forms that date that far back in existance today, that we know of. The oldest that could be construed as being korean would be the Kwon Bop Bo (Kwon Bup Bu) form that is illustrated in the Mu Yea Dobo Tongji (available from Tuttle Press).
Kuk Sool has some interesting open hand forms but there is no for sure history, but they look very chinese, In Hyuk Suh claims different however. Only he knows for sure.
Tae Kwon Do's older brother would be Tang Soo Do or Kong Soo Do, the oldest form there would be Pal Che (Bassai) or Nahanji (Nae Bu Jin)..
--Josh
Note I said "Construed" ;-) I am aware that the Kwon Bup Bo is simply Qi Ji Kwangs 32 postures...Actually, Chiz'bo, the case for `ancient' TKD forms is even is even worse than this: The massive late 18th c. Korean martial arts manual Muye dobo tongji, supposedly an encyclopædia of native Korean combat techniques, turns out, according to Burdick (1997), to be `nearly identical to the Jixiao Xinshu (New Book for Effective Discipline)... by the Chinese General Qi Jiguang (1528--1587)', written nearly two and a half centuries earlier. The translation and transliteration task involved, as Burdick notes, would have been well within the capabilities of the Muye dobo tongji's author, `a scholar famed for his erudition in classical Chinese' according to Henning's 2000 Journal of Asian Martial Arts article I've cited in my previous replies to Bret and Chinto. The fact that this supposed repository of Korean MAs is essentially a translation of a Chinese military manual, and that Kwan Bop is nothing other than a Korean borrowing, with slight corresponding modifications in pronunciation, of chuan fa, cuts the legs out from under any attempt to provide a documentary source for `ancient' KMA forms and practice. As Burdick points out, virtually everything we can identify on the Korean peninsula as a genuine fighting art, weapons or empty-hand, can be confidently identified as having a Chinese origin up until the various avatars of Korean Shotokan karate that became repackaged as TKD and TSD in the 1950s.
... both of which TSD forms of course are Okinawan by way (some would claim a long way) of Japan.
I myself find nothing disappointing or regrettable about this state of affairs. The lack of a genuine ancient lineage doesn't detract one bit from the potential effectiveness of KMAs in terms of their primary purpose, which was personal self-defense under difficult and dangerous conditions. The Korean armed forces showed, to the great cost of the North Koreans in the Korean war and the North Vietnamese and VC in the Vietnam War, just how savagely effective was the version of TKD that General Choi and his associates developed and taught to the ROK infantry and Marine units. The KMAs have all the firepower for CQ self-defense that anyone could want, if they're trained that way. Ancient origins are just the icing on the cake. As John Bishop pointed out in an old post I cited yesterday in MJS's `martial arts evolving' thread, many of the most popular and highly regarded MAs postdate the invention of the internal combustion engine.
Note I said "Construed" ;-) I am aware that the Kwon Bup Bo is simply Qi Ji Kwangs 32 postures...
I agree 100% In reality it does not matter if one can trace back some ancient lineage. What it comes down to is does it work? When the practicioner steps on the mat can they stand up?
BTW please just call me Josh...
--josh
Right—alas, there are a number of people out there who don't realize this (including the author of one really awful article in the latest Black Belt mag, but then, careful history isn't exactly what they're known for... )
Yup!
You got it, Josh, and a bonus as well to go along with it, for some really good posts...![]()
I agree 100% about BB Mag, I dont actually bother with it anymore...The only one I tend to read is Asian Journal,
and for entertainment purposes TKD times ^_^
I guess in the earlier days of BBmag Mr. Robert Young used to only allow articles with cited references, well I guess that didnt last. It seems that in the world of martial arts periodicals nothing with real substance stands up, only the folks with the most $$$ and articles that can make the most $$$ with the main readership (which seems to these days be targeted at teens very young adults).
take care,
--josh
This preponderance of evidence in favor of the thoroughly Chinese platform on which the ancient KMAs were built, and the Japanese source of the modern KMAs, seems to disturb some people, to the point where they simply deny the historically available evidence in favor of fantasy and legendary history. I've no idea why that is, but it's not unique to this particular question; there are also people who insist that the Inca pyramids, Easter Island statues and various ancient European monuments simply could not have gotten where they are without the intervention of extraterrestrials to guide construction operations from their interstellar space vessels, in spite of the fact that the ingenious but earthbound technological bases of these various architectural achievements is now well-known and well-attested. Well, I guess it's a harmless enough sort of fantasizing...![]()
Careful Exile! You might give the mythmakers ideas and next thing we know there will be Celestial Dojangs popping up all over the place, claiming to teach ancient TKD techniques created by Aliens and Predators.
The ancient Korean Alien/Predator arts are of course the grandfather of numerous other arts like Ninjitsu too. Where do you think they got the secret of invisibility if not from the Predators? Ashida Kim has been trying to cover this up the for years but we know the truth!
If people want myths, why not take it all the way?
Now we just have to figure out how much we're going to sell those Celestial Dojang franchises for, make a few well-placed calls to the advert department of TKD Times (who will, if they follow standard practice, award us a cover story showing us in absurd combat-like stances with frightening martial expressions on our faces—we can flip for who gets to be uke and who gets to be tori) and Black Belt and start watching the gold roll in.... :EG: