Hi eggg1994,
I applaud your enthusiasm, however I would caution you against putting yourself up as an "expert", especially in this field and in this company. I'm going to try to be as gentle as I can here, but I'm going to go through your post and demonstrate a few things you may be unaware of at the moment.
hey i know alot about self defence and place's in the human body you could attack.
The first question any of us would ask is what do you feel makes you qualified to make such a definate, bold statement.
The second thing is to clarify what you know about self defence. Realistically, it has little to do with things like knowing places in the human body to attack, and has far more to do with understanding the effects of adrenaline, proper awareness of your environment (including legal systems), the realities of gross-motor actions, understanding of the common attacks that you could encounter, and more. We'll cover that as we go on.
there are the vital pressure points which are the ear, nose, thout, groin, and the arteries in the neck.
While these are certainly viable targets, they are not necessarily anywhere near as available, or even as effective as you are thinking. And again, the idea of relying on these targeting concepts is not really a good one when it comes down to it. For self defence, think broader. Body. Jaw. That kind of thing. And more importantly, train a gross-motor (simple) strike, or few strikes, that can be applied under the effects of a high-level adrenaline surge.
i know alot about the principel's of joint locking and choke application's like for example if the grabed you on the shoulder you could distract them with a palm strike to the face and then grab the wrist and twist it toward's their body and then their bodies reaction would be to drop to the ground.
That is an idealised situation as found in a class/dojo situation. And, honestly, it won't go down that way.
i know alot of defensive technique's like defence from a haymaker, choke from behind, front choke with both hands, headlock, and many more.
Defensive techniques, honestly, mean nothing when it comes to self defence. Well trained principles, on the other hand, are vital. The techniques are a way to get to the principles, but by themselves don't actually mean much.
i also know some follow up strikes which i could use for attack's to distract them so they could give me a joint i could minipulate easly.
This is closer to a principle, but it isn't a great one. It reads as a "I think I could" statement, untested and unverified under realistic circumstances. I have very real doubts as to it's applicability.
i know this because of my 1yr of training in brazilian jiu jitsu which i heard was one of the most effective forms of self defence in the world.
1 year in any art is barely starting out, I have to say it is not really any basis to claim to "know a lot" about such things. Relax, enjoy the classes, learn what you can, and eventually you may get to a point where you start to approach that degree of understanding, hopefully you will.
In terms of you hearing BJJ was "one of the most effective forms of self defence in the world", bear in mind that that, really, is a marketing term. BJJ is designed to be a specialist system, geared primarily against other BJJ practitioners, rather than actually designed for self defence. Does that mean it can't be used for self defence? No, not at all, it just means that self defence is not what it was designed for, so take such statements with a grain of salt, from anyone saying it for any art whatsoever.
i am an orange belt in jiu jitsu not japanease jiu jitsu but the brazilian jiu jitsu.
From what we understand, orange belt is a junior belt (it doesn't exist in the adult rankings), typically for practitioners under the age of 15. Do you mind if you ask how old you are?
if yall have anything to say about my knowledge of self defence then you can post anything you would like for me to discuss.
To begin with, could you answer the above questions? Until they are covered, it may be difficult for many members here to consider you someone who truly knows much about the subject, especially as many have been training much longer than you have been alive, and still don't consider themselves "experts" by any stretch.
As well as that, could you possibly confirm Tez's thoughts that you are autistic (you wouldn't be the first, or alone here on that, by the way), unless that is too personal a question. If it is, I understand, but it may help others in understanding where you are coming from.
