I'm glad no feelings are hurt. Straight to the meat of it then....
Maybe you should be more specific on you use of the term pivot. Did you mean pivot as in turning the body- from the
A side of the bar of the form to the
B side of the form, or maybe, turning onto the
mainline, from the
B side of the bar of the form. or, pivoting the support foot while kicking?
I mean a body turn. Turning smoothly while maintaining proper balance and STRUCTURE is an under-appreciated nuance of the martial arts. Various styles (and even within styles) of TKD have differing ideas on where the turn originates from: hips, shoulders, head or feet.
The patterns I seen the all differ in this respect and that's before we even consider stance shifting, chambering, body part acceleration, or body tension. So I think it impractical to try to practice another set of forms. Sure you can learn the choreography of a new form, but you'd likely be performing them with the same basics as in your own system. Now if you're one of those talented people who can keep it separate in your mind and body, good for you. I'm not sure everyone on this thread appreciates how big an impact these "subtle" nuances can have when you are trying to milk that last 10% efficiency out of your performance and muscle conditioning.
I believe Brandon used a music analogy above of scales, saying each set of forms is another scale and therefore practicing them all improves him as a musician. I would say each set of forms is actually more like a different instrument, say a clarinet and a violin. A supremely talented musician may be able to reach world class on both instruments. It certainly can be done. But if you are a mere mortal, you are better off dedicating yourself to one instrument and striving to master that.
Someone else asked about crosstraining. When you cross train, do you practice TKD with perhaps hapkido which would be a good blend indeed. Or do you cross train TKD with tang soo do which would be curious, somewhat useless and even perhaps disastrous?
I was refering to the Chinees masters of antiquity, the samuria class-who were also MA'st practice both empty hand close combat, with the bow and arrow and of course the sword. This (the sammurai) does in fact date back at least 900 years. King David- made his warriors practice form with thier sword. I suggest you do some more researc, there are plenty of reliable text out there to cooborate my statements, You should maybe do some more researching, as do I, and most of the regular poste's on MT
Hmm, this paragraph is a bit of a mess. Samurai weren't Chinese and to my knowledge they did not practice empty hand kata ala the Okinawans. I don't know where King David comes into the picture either and I won't pretend to know what type of martial arts the Biblical Judeans practiced. I stand by my statement that saying the "ancient masters practiced forms before their battles to the death" is perhaps inaccurate and overly romanticized. It's not important to our discussion however, so I'll let it drop.
Once again on the pivot, I refer to the above question in paragraph 1. I do't see knowinfg two sets of forms as counter productive and bad for you muscle memory. You have't provided cooboration that it is. The MA'st I 've witnessed are quite competent of doing both sets of forms and understanding the concepts of each form. To short change their ability is not fair to them.
I have restated my position a bit above using the pivot as an example. If everyone in your circle has such high ability, you are a fine bunch indeed. Good for you and I mean that with no sarcasm.
My years of service and my "lofty rank" is a the forefront of most of my knowledge, not to mention reading studying the history (mainly Korean) for the 28 years. Sir, I am still a student of MA after all these years. Don't consider arguement , just an intlectual discussion
No, I am pleased to participate on this forum. It's one of the better ones I'm read. May I suggest delving within some other sources than Korean for information about martial arts history and evolution? Korean sources are somewhat problematic due to the deeply political parentage from which they spring.
Choosing to be anonymous is certainly your choice. But I don't think anyone who posts on this forum will ever attack you. I just think it would give more credit to your posts. My accompliments do carry forward through the intenet. As do others accomplishments who regularly post on MT. Oh my gosh Lurkers...:lurk: NO WAY j/k
Still, Knowing some of your background would help define why you are so passionate and opinionated.
It's not the MT posters I am worried about. As for my posts, I believe they can stand for themselves without the backing of who I am or who my teachers were or what trophies I have won. In the end, it's the content of what I post that speaks towards my currency on this board, not my dan ranking. I understand you feel differently and that's fine.
Good day to you, sir. I'm glad there are no hard feelings.