jasonbrinn
Purple Belt
Please consider these truths:
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This fails to point out that the policies of 2005-2008 caused the deficits of 2009-2012 also if not for acitions of Obama we would have had a depression with people on the streets with out shelter or food. Neither a Republican nor a Democrat could have solved the policies of the previous 12 years in a short period why else could the RNC not come up with a better team than McCain and Palin? why for the first time in any recent history did Bush and Cheney hide out and were not invited to play in any Reindeer Games?Please consider these truths:
For anyone really interested in honest education about the defecit and borrowing should view the following video;
http://www.upworthy.com/a-6-minute-...better-than-the-presidential-candi?g=2&c=ufb1
In every way conceivable? Really...that's rich. Obama has supplanted Carter...that takes real talent.
Ditto... er... I mean same here. LOLalready voted for Obama, by mail.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
in every way conceivable, Obama and Biden while not perfect, are far far far far far more capable than Romney and Ryan.
I don't hate obama. I think he is a bad person, and definitely not a "nice," guy. You are known by the company you keep, and he has kept company with terrorists and racists of the worst sort, but I think that is mainly because he was raised by anti-American communist types from the time he was a little boy. It wasn't his fault really, but that doesn't change the fact that he needs to be voted out of office before what he has set in motion is set in cement.
During the 2008 campaign, President Obama promised he would close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility within a year of his inauguration. Four years later, Guantanamo remains open and will remain open for the foreseeable future.
What he doesn’t mention is that many terrorist detainees would be better off if Obama had stuck to Bush’s detention policies. That’s because, in an effort to avoid sending detainees to Guantanamo, Obama has kept them in overseas military prisons, where they have no access to U.S. courts and languish in worse conditions than the detainees held at Guantanamo.
One of President Obama’s first actions after taking office was to sign an executive order to close the Guantanamo facility. But Obama soon found that doing so was impossible: foreign countries were not willing to take prisoners cleared for release; the American people didn’t want hardened terrorists sent to American shores and tried in civilian courts; and some prisoners couldn’t be tried and were too dangerous to be released, which meant they had to be detained indefinitely.
But detainees’ conditions haven’t improved because, rather than sending them to Guantanamo Bay, President Obama has kept some of them in places such as Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan. Detainees in these locations face worse living conditions than those in Guantanamo. More importantly, they don’t have access to U.S. courts, which they would if they were at Guantanamo (the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. Bush suggests that detainees held at Guantanamo have the right to challenge their detention in federal court but detainees held outside of Guantanamo do not — an interpretation that has since been confirmed by lower courts). This leaves detainees with no way to challenge their detention outside of the military legal system.
It is, however, a good arrangement for President Obama: This way, he can both keep his promise to reduce the Guantanamo population and prevent detainees from accessing U.S. courts.
One detainee, Faid al-Maqaleh, has been held at Bagram since 2003. His case is particularly intriguing since a military review board has cleared him for release three times.