It's a good question. It's actually one I've considered if I were to open a no-forms version of TKD. I've discussed the idea on the TKD forum, of running a TKD class parallel to a BJJ class in which we focus almost exclusively on TKD-style kicking and sparring. In that style, belts would be given similar to BJJ. But I've also thought about transfer belts in relation to a "broad-spectrum" TKD class that includes a full curriculum.
First, let's look at what the belts mean and why we might want to give them a white belt OR why we might want to give them something else.
- In favor of the upper belt:
- We want to respect their journey and past work.
- We want to show respect to their former Master and school.
- We want to give an idea of their experience level to the instructors and the other students in the class.
- In favor of the white belt:
- We want to show how much we trust their martial skills based on our experience with them. Because we have no experience with them, we give them a white belt.
- Because if they did not go to a quality school, they may embarrass our school by wearing an upper belt.
- We do not want them to be in over there head with our curriculum (whether because they're learning a bunch of new rote material or having trouble assimilating, or because they were not given quality training at their past school).
I will say that in my experience,
most people who quit one school and then join another school in a similar art are going to be good at it. Even if they went to a McDojo that had decent teaching but low standards, the ones passionate enough to continue after the hardship of leaving their old gym tend to have the skill that comes with it. I have fond memories of several students who transferred into our gym and were among the best at their rank almost immediately. I have one memory of a girl that was woefully underprepared by her previous gym.
This girl is the one reason I would say a risk assessment is prudent. I'm not saying because of her, we should just give white belts to every newcomer regardless of experience. But I am saying I wouldn't judge a school for making that policy. This girl came in with a black belt. She would've struggled in the purple/orange class. She could barely do a roundhouse kick, and didn't know any other kicks. Her forms were incredibly sloppy. She barely knew how to follow directions and had a poor attitude. We turned all that around in the couple years she was with us, and by the time she earned her 2nd degree under us, she was at least as good as most of our black belts.
But during the first year there, it was a struggle for her. I could tell she was embarrassed. She always needed someone to coach her through every movement of drills that were pretty basic for everyone else. She was the only one that needed constant handholding throughout the class. I feel she would have been much better served by being put in our purple/orange class. In that class, we teach the fundamentals that she was struggling with.
With that said, I feel there's a number of options when someone comes in with an upper belt from a similar style. Since we're talking TKD, I'm going to say arts like TKD, TSD, many forms of Karate, or some forms of Kung Fu. I'm ignoring belts from arts without forms (such as Krav Maga, Aikido, Hapkido, Judo, Brazilian Jiu-JItsu, etc.).
- Bring everyone in as a white belt.
- And have them follow the process.
- Or let them skip-test.
- Or after a few weeks or few months, promote them where you think they should be based on their demonstrated skill.
- Bring them in at their current rank (or an equivalent color, depending on the belt order of their previous school).
- And possibly demote them to a lower belt if it's clear they're in over their head.
- Or let them keep that belt until they're ready to be promoted to the next level.
- Or promote purely based on improvement and keep giving promotions to encourage retention.
- Bring them in without a belt until you're confident where they place in your system.
- Bring them in with a non-color belt (at least, not a color in your style) or bring them in with a stripe. For example, if you only do solid color belts, they could come in as brown with white stripe. Something to signify that they're experienced, but also an outsider.
Each of these carries some risk.
- Bring everyone in as a white belt, you risk:
- Alienating someone who feels disrespected. (Savvy Talk-No-Jitsu can help with this).
- Holding someone back in their career if they want to coach or open their own gym.
- Confusing the other white belts when this new "white belt" is clearly experienced.
- Bring everyone in at their current rank, and you risk the issues I mention above. They may embarrass the gym or they may embarrass themselves.
- Bring everyone in with a symbol of the outsider and they may feel even more like an outsider.
Personally, if I had to make the choice, I'd bring them in at a mix of 2.1 and 2.2 above. They would carry over their rank from a previous gym. If they're struggling, but still able to keep their head above water, I'd let them keep it, but it would be a bit before they were promoted. I would mostly look at how they do with kicks and how well they
follow along with the curriculum, not necessarily how well they do with my specific self-defense curriculum or how fast they memorize the forms.
However, if someone was clearly drowning, I'd give them a lower-color life vest. I would do my best to tell them I think it's a good opportunity to work on fundamentals and build up to where they need to be.
I've been the guy that's been told, "I don't care what belt you got from another school, if
I didn't give you a belt, you're a white belt in
my school." I've seen what happens when people transfer into a BJJ gym as an upper belt and are basically plug-and-play. But I've also seen the girl I mentioned earlier. I wouldn't want someone that deficient representing my gym, and I wouldn't want to put someone through that gauntlet again.