Season 1 Episode 2: Viking vs Samurai

Samurai

Blue Belt
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
298
Reaction score
8
Location
Topeka, KS
Just as an aside,
The bow that the Viking used in the drama part of this program was made by me. Morning Star Productions in LA called WoodlandArchery.com and told me they needed a Viking bow in 2 days. All I had was a longbow, so they took that and using it in the drama bits, not the testing.

Sort of fun to think I had a hand in this, but it was historically incorrect. Maybe, the Vikings grabbed the bow in a raid or something :)

Thanks
Jeremy Bays
WoodlandArchery.com
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
Not that the Germanic sword was necessarily an inferior weapon. There are some marvelous pattern-welded differentially tempered examples around. They don't give up pride of place to many blades.
 

Langenschwert

Master Black Belt
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
353
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
Not that the Germanic sword was necessarily an inferior weapon. There are some marvelous pattern-welded differentially tempered examples around. They don't give up pride of place to many blades.

Indeed. Frankish swords were prized weapons all over the known world, from Europe to the Middle East. They had a lot of the same hype and mystique that the katana does for many today.

Best regards,

-Mark
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
And where the hell do the producers get off saying the Viking is all "brute force" and "berserker rage". We don't know an awful lot about how they fought, but we do have accounts of fights and battles. A clever fighter who fought with skill and cunning was always highly praised. Baresarks were a special brand of religious fanatic. Stick 'em out in front and make sure you stay behind them when you rush the enemy. But there are a lot more tokens of Frey and Thor than Odin in the old graves

These guys held their own against knights and professional soldiers all over Europe and beyond. They ended up ruling Russia and served as mercenaries and bodyguards in all sorts of wars. They had complex maneuvers like the mobile shield wall.

And they had better nutrition, size and strength than the average Japanese of pretty much any period. That counts for a lot.

Not every "Samurai" was a chumbara movie death machine. Many were minimally trained spear carriers.

Again, training and experience count for a lot. If the Samurai were from the bad old pre-Shogunate days he would have had all the battle-hardening anyone could hope for. If he were from the centuries of brutally enforced peace, not so much.
 

sgtmac_46

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
189
Are the people wielding these weapons in these "tests" really the best examples to use? Because the Katana didn't cut through the chainmail...was it the sword or the wielder? Would a better swordsman have had a different result? Saying that one weapon was more effective than another based on the "tests" on this show is junk science IMO. Thats my issue with this series.

That's why blades evolved, historically, to adapt to changes in armor.

The fact remains that chainmail is a very effective counter to the Katana's advantages.
 

sgtmac_46

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
189
Having not seen the episode, why is it assumed that the Samurai has greater technical expertise than the Viking?

Too many movies........

The reality is that a man who grows up in a warrior culture, fighting from the time he's a child, and who has, throughout his life, fought in and survived numerous violent encounters, will be very skilled and deadly.
 

Chris Parker

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
6,259
Reaction score
1,104
Location
Melbourne, Australia
That's why blades evolved, historically, to adapt to changes in armor.

The fact remains that chainmail is a very effective counter to the Katana's advantages.

This is very true, however it may be noted that chainmail as a major component was never popular in Japanese armour. The very simple reason for this is that the Katana was simply not a weapon expected to go up against in an armoured battlefield-type scenario, for that the most common weapon during the Sengoku Jidai was the simple su-yari (straight spear).

The adaptation in armour to go against this was to remove a lot of the lacing of the older styles of armour and go for a more plain plate-style form, as the laces would catch the spear tip, leaving the armoured guy vulnerable to it's movements as the spear guy tried to pry it loose. The plate-based versions (okegawa do, do maru etc) allowed the spear tip to deflect to the side. Chain mail would be punctured by a weapon such as a su-yari, so to go against the Vikings chain-mail (that they showed), a more accurate weapon (historically) would have faired much better.

As has been mentioned earlier, the Japanese sword went through quite a lot of development over 1000 years of samurai history, and so did their armour and other weaponry. Again, without defining which period their "samurai" is from, this entire episode (and to my mind the entire premise of the whole series) is entirely moot, proves nothing, and is barely above Naruto for any form of realistic information. But that's me.
 

sgtmac_46

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
189
This is very true, however it may be noted that chainmail as a major component was never popular in Japanese armour. The very simple reason for this is that the Katana was simply not a weapon expected to go up against in an armoured battlefield-type scenario, for that the most common weapon during the Sengoku Jidai was the simple su-yari (straight spear).

The adaptation in armour to go against this was to remove a lot of the lacing of the older styles of armour and go for a more plain plate-style form, as the laces would catch the spear tip, leaving the armoured guy vulnerable to it's movements as the spear guy tried to pry it loose. The plate-based versions (okegawa do, do maru etc) allowed the spear tip to deflect to the side. Chain mail would be punctured by a weapon such as a su-yari, so to go against the Vikings chain-mail (that they showed), a more accurate weapon (historically) would have faired much better.

As has been mentioned earlier, the Japanese sword went through quite a lot of development over 1000 years of samurai history, and so did their armour and other weaponry. Again, without defining which period their "samurai" is from, this entire episode (and to my mind the entire premise of the whole series) is entirely moot, proves nothing, and is barely above Naruto for any form of realistic information. But that's me.

True enough.
 

Haakon

Blue Belt
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
299
Reaction score
10
Chain mail would be punctured by a weapon such as a su-yari, so to go against the Vikings chain-mail (that they showed), a more accurate weapon (historically) would have faired much better.

Better but still not that great based on the criteria they use on this show. The Discovery Channel has a show called "Secrets of the Vikings", in one segment they tested Viking chainmail against a spear that was launched by a machine. The spear penetrated the chainmail, but only by 1", and didn't make it through the quilted padding underneath, so by the standards of 'Deadliest Warrior' the spear wouldn't have been effective either since it wouldn't have made a kill shot, which seems to be the only thing they really count.
viking.gif
 

Chris Parker

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
6,259
Reaction score
1,104
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Except for the fact that the Japanese spear is almost never thrown, instead the basis of Sojutsu is two-handed thrusting actions. That adds a lot of penetrating power to the weapon as there is a base for it to push back against, and as such it does go through chain mail quite well. Of course, this is assuming that the show would have gotten someone who understood the Japanese yari well enough to demonstrate that.... not a lot of hope.

Two of the most famous Sojutsu lineages still being taught are the Hozoin Ryu, who are famous for, amongst other things, their use of some of the more exotic spears, such as Jumonji (or Juji) Yari, a spear with two "cross" blades coming out at the base of the primary blade, and a Katakama Yari, a spear with a crescent-sickle shaped blade on one side, and a small spike on the other. These spears are about 9 feet long, typically, and a good clip of a demo for the Hozoin Ryu Takeda-ha is:


The other main system still around is the Owari Kan Ryu, famous for another type of Yari, a Kuda Yari (sleeve spear) which allows a very fast sliding action without losing your grip on the spear. Here they are:


You may notice that they are not thrown at any point (in fact, outside of a few Kukishinden high level kata, I haven't come across any examples of a Japanese spear being thrown, they're just too damn long, and besides, after you've thrown your weapon away, what do you do then?). Thown spears (like javelins) were shorter, lighter, and carried in groupings of three or more. But they weren't Japanese.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Haakon

Blue Belt
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
299
Reaction score
10
Except for the fact that the Japanese spear is almost never thrown, instead the basis of Sojutsu is two-handed thrusting actions. That adds a lot of penetrating power to the weapon as there is a base for it to push back against, and as such it does go through chain mail quite well. Of course, this is assuming that the show would have gotten someone who understood the Japanese yari well enough to demonstrate that.... not a lot of hope.

No argument there!

Two of the most famous Sojutsu lineages still being taught are the Hozoin Ryu, who are famous for, amongst other things, their use of some of the more exotic spears, such as Jumonji (or Juji) Yari, a spear with two "cross" blades coming out at the base of the primary blade, and a Katakama Yari, a spear with a crescent-sickle shaped blade on one side, and a small spike on the other. These spears are about 9 feet long, typically, and a good clip of a demo for the Hozoin Ryu Takeda-ha is:


The other main system still around is the Owari Kan Ryu, famous for another type of Yari, a Kuda Yari (sleeve spear) which allows a very fast sliding action without losing your grip on the spear. Here they are:


You may notice that they are not thrown at any point (in fact, outside of a few Kukishinden high level kata, I haven't come across any examples of a Japanese spear being thrown, they're just too damn long, and besides, after you've thrown your weapon away, what do you do then?). Thown spears (like javelins) were shorter, lighter, and carried in groupings of three or more. But they weren't Japanese.

So it sounds like a Japanese spear is more analogous to a western pike.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

xJOHNx

Purple Belt
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
381
Reaction score
11
All I can say is, why did they cut the chain mail?
A thrust would be more effective..

Or just slicing the arms, legs or throat.. 1 cut in 1 dimension, proves nothing.

And all that braging and boasting, idiotic.
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
This is very true, however it may be noted that chainmail as a major component was never popular in Japanese armour. The very simple reason for this is that the Katana was simply not a weapon expected to go up against in an armoured battlefield-type scenario, for that the most common weapon during the Sengoku Jidai was the simple su-yari (straight spear).

Absolutely. Swordsmen are at a terrible disadvantage against spearmen.
 

Latest Discussions

Top