I've been doing kata for quite a while, but I have to disagree with a few things.
I can understand that the study of traditional kata can be very difficult,it is supposed to be.Some of the old Okinawan masters spent their entire lives studying three or four kata.The advanced study of kata will involve several possible applications of assorted technique for each attack(series of moves in a kata),to not train for each possible application is to have a very small arsenal of knowlege to defend yourself.
This I agree with. The sad thing is that there are some instructors out there that do not know or understand the applications of the moves themselves, therefore making it harder to teach the meaning to their students. I always refer back to Dillman when talking about this. He is someone that can give many applications to forms.
Without kata how can you train sweeps ,throws ,foot catches and all the other possible defences that can be learned from the lifelong studies of our predecesors?
There are arts out there that do not do kata but still train those moves.
Without kata all you have are punches and kicks.
True, but one can still be effective with those tools.
Now lets talk about these schools that do not teach kata,I would venture to guess they do not teach makiwara use also.A dojo without a makiwara is a dance school.
Every school is different. Do boxing schools have makiwara?
Those punches and kicks unless trained properly with makiwara will not have the power needed to acheive the desired outcome as well as likely injury to your own wrist ,elbow ,ankle or knee.
Again, I go back to boxing. Does Tyson, or any other boxer out there hit one?
Mike