kempo and kenpo

S

sammy3170

Guest
Originally posted by sammy3170

The only people who would bag Kempo are Kenpo people. I have found though my training (did Kenpo, now do Kempo) that American Kenpo has developed a lot of (not all) arrogant instructors who believe that their art is the be all and end all and that nothing comes close. Ignore what others say and just enjoy your training, if it gives you what you want it is good.

Cheers
Sammy

I can't quote for all arts just from my experience so don't take offence. It's just that I have met numerous American Kenpo people who are arrogant including a 7th degree black belt who told me it was his right(because of his rank) to be arrogant. Just an observation and no offence was meant.

Cheers
Sammy
 
R

RyuShiKan

Guest
Originally posted by Blindside

Well, kenpo and kempo are technically the same things. It should be spelled "kenpo" but pronounced "kempo."

Uuuuh No.
There are 2 ways to pronounce the same word. Kempo and Kenpo are both correct, just as the word for Japan in Japanese is either Nippon or Nihon or the word for newspaper can be Shinbun or Shimbun.


Originally posted by Blindside

Regardless of who is right about how to spell it, there has been an artificial division in how it is used in the US. The schools using "kempo" tend to be identified with traditional Japanese systems, an example would be Shorinji Kempo. On the other hand, kenpo tends to be identified with schools that are less traditional and have a more modern approach, Ed Parkers American Kenpo being a prime example.

Uuuuh No again.

Nakamura Shigeru of Okinawa Kenpo used the Kenpo pronunciation and he was not part of any modern group or Ed Parkers American Kenpo .



Originally posted by Zoran

Well, if you really want to get technical, Funakoshi was the first to use the term Kara-Te.

Actually Itosu Anko was the first followed by Hanashiro Chomo then most likely 3rd runner up was Funakoshi.


Originally posted by sammy3170

He started to ue the term Karate when he developed Shotokan.............

Funakoshi didn't "develop" Shotokan per say. His students started calling his art Shotokan........

Originally posted by sammy3170

Kempo and Kenpo are the same and as mentioned before the more eclectic arts tend to use Kenpo and the more traditional ones use Kempo.


Refer to the statement about Nakamura Shigeru.

True there are different factions of Kempo/Kenpo some are legit others are not.
Is Kempo/Kenpo the same as Karate? Yes.
Mr. Nakamura of Okinawa Kenpo taught the same kata that were taught in a Shorin Ryu Karate dojo.
So why the confusion in the US?
The old name for Karate was Ryukyu Kempo/Kenpo Tode (karate=China hand kanji ) Jutsu.
So you have both Karate and Kempo/Kenpo in the same name...........people have started to claim the 2 are different in the US for political reasons and because their knowledge of basic Japanese is seriously lacking.
 

Michael Billings

Senior Master
MTS Alumni
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
31
Location
Austin, Texas USA-Terra
I appreciate the clarification. There has been a split here in the Americas between Kenpo and Kempo. It was created on purpose as Edmund Kealoha Parker Sr. continued to develop his interpretation of Kenpo. All lineages, to my knowledge, that go directly back to him, post 1960, are spelled with the "N", not the "M". This has caused a definition change, BY PRACTICAL USAGE only. Not a change in what the word "means".

Thanks though for the clarification from someone who understands the literal meaning. I had no idea that any Japanese practitioners actually used Kenpo. I was familiar with both Ryukyu Kempo and Shorinji Kempo, but your insight and sharing are appreciated.

Oos,
-Michael
 

satans.barber

Master Black Belt
Joined
Mar 30, 2002
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
6
Location
Leeds, England
Originally posted by Michael Billings

All lineages, to my knowledge, that go directly back to him, post 1960, are spelled with the "N", not the "M".

Nope :)

My Style is Kempo Ryu, and it can be traced back to Ed. Parker.

It's small admittedly compared to the might of some of the organisations, but you did say 'all'!

Ian.
 
C

CraneWings

Guest
Kempo and Kenpo are pretty much the exact same same style. The only difference is that one is the spelling in Chinese (kempo) and one is the spelling in Japanese (kenpo). I also attend a Kempo school and don't let anyone ever put your style down. Because Kempo is a real style and I find it to be one of the Best. SO do what youlike, and don't listen to others and what they say!
 
R

RyuShiKan

Guest
Originally posted by CraneWings
Kempo and Kenpo are pretty much the exact same same style. The only difference is that one is the spelling in Chinese (kempo) and one is the spelling in Japanese (kenpo).

Actually that's not correct. Japanese use both the "N" & the "M" sound when pronouncing Kenpo/Kempo. It depends on several things, not the least of which is the region in Japan you happen to be in.
 

Zoran

Black Belt
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
689
Reaction score
21
Location
chicago area
Originally posted by RyuShiKan
Actually that's not correct. Japanese use both the "N" & the "M" sound when pronouncing Kenpo/Kempo. It depends on several things, not the least of which is the region in Japan you happen to be in.

Agreed :)

I believe the approximate Chinese version of the word Kenpo would be Chuan Fa. Just don't quote me on it. I am not an expert on either Japanese or Chinese languages.
 

Goldendragon7

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
5,643
Reaction score
37
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona
Originally posted by sammy3170
The only people who would bag Kempo are Kenpo people. I have found though my training (did Kenpo, now do Kempo) that American Kenpo has developed a lot of (not all) arrogant instructors who believe that their art is the be all and end all and that nothing comes close. Cheers Sammy

Unfortunately Sammy, I agree with you. Many AK Black Belts are missing in the "respect for other's and their arts" categories. Still, there are many, many great Kenpoists that are much more open minded, and considerate of others regardless of their preferences. I did see you post "not all" were arrogant, thank you for allowing each person to make or break their own posture, and then judge them on what they say or do.

We all love our respective Arts and instructors, that is a given, but it appears we still need some schooling on our people skills in dealing with others respectfully when debating issues intelligently.

:asian:
 
B

bahenlaura

Guest
Originally posted by Goldendragon7
Unfortunately Sammy, I agree with you. Many AK Black Belts are missing in the "respect for other's and their arts" categories. Still, there are many, many great Kenpoists that are much more open minded, and considerate of others regardless of their preferences. I did see you post "not all" were arrogant, thank you for allowing each person to make or break their own posture, and then judge them on what they say or do.

We all love our respective Arts and instructors, that is a given, but it appears we still need some schooling on our people skills in dealing with others respectfully when debating issues intelligently.

:asian:

Amen!

:soapbox:
 
R

RyuShiKan

Guest
Originally posted by Zoran
Agreed :)

I believe the approximate Chinese version of the word Kenpo would be Chuan Fa. Just don't quote me on it. I am not an expert on either Japanese or Chinese languages.


Your right it is Chuan Fa in Chinese.
 
K

Katie Simmons

Guest
Originally posted by nightingale8472
The word itself has the same meaning no matter how its spelled.

Different styles use different spellings.

Every style has good points and bad points. Including EPAK. I wish EPAK had a little more groundfighting, because if I ended up going to the ground, I wouldn't know what to do, because its not a situation I've ever trained for.

If you go to the ground, strike Strike STRIKE. Never play the grappling game and get back on your feet as soon as possible. Train from the ground up occasionally; just lie on the ground and have one of your classmates attack you from a standing position, as if she had taken you down and was proceeding to kick the crap out of you. See if you can get her off you (using whatever means necessary) long enough for you to get back on your feet, to more equal ground. Also, if you can find a skilled grappler or wrestler to work out with, not to actually learn to grapple or wrestle, but to see how you can use your striking skills against them. It helps, believe me. Most grapplers don't know how to deal with a striker.
 

Matt Stone

Master of Arts
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
1,711
Reaction score
30
Location
Fort Lewis, Washington
It seems to me, not that I am a chuan fa/kempo/kenpo practitioner at all, that the bigger issue is one of linguistic fluency.

The argument, at least what there is of one, regarding the legitimate use of the phonetic representation of "kem(n)po" stems from the fact that we are all using the romanization of the sounds uttered in reference to the characters used, and trying to cite said romanization as the definitive transliteration for universal use...

Personally, regardless of what others say (and I have been on the receiving end of many peoples' rebuttals to what I am about to say), that a martial artist practicing an Asian martial art is failing in his or her education by not at least exploring some of the language of the country of origin of their art. If you study a Japanese art, learn some Japanese. If your art is Chinese, Indonesian, Filipino, then learn some of the appropriate language. If, for no other reason, than to sound authentic, a student almost has a responsibility to do so. Especially those who have their eye(s) on becoming an instructor one day. There is nothing worse in my book (as if my book were so large or important) than an instructor who is ignorant of some part of their art. An instructor should strive to master the physical technique, to become an authority on the historical relevance of his/her art, to be fully versed in the strategies and philosophies (if either exist) of his/her art, and to at least speak the relevant words and phrases in his/her art's mother tongue with some degree of fluency (i.e. correct pronunciation, correct grammar, correct understanding).

Just my 2 yen. Take it for what it is worth, or not.

Gambarimasu.
:asian:
 

Chronuss

Senior Master
Joined
Jun 21, 2002
Messages
4,647
Reaction score
12
Location
Charles Town, WV
Originally posted by CraneWings
Kempo and Kenpo are pretty much the exact same same style. The only difference is that one is the spelling

hmm...no. American Kenpo is not a style, it is a system. I cannot speak for Chinese Kempo or anything else thereafter, because I honestly do not know.
 
B

bahenlaura

Guest
Originally posted by Chronuss
hmm...no. American Kenpo is not a style, it is a system. I cannot speak for Chinese Kempo or anything else thereafter, because I honestly do not know.

:)

"The Kenpo SYSTEM is based on the outer limits of simplicity and the starting point of complexity."

"Kenpo's true value is not in what you KNOW, but what you DO."

Senior Grand Master Ed Parket.

:asian:
 

Zoran

Black Belt
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
689
Reaction score
21
Location
chicago area
Originally posted by Katie Simmons
Most grapplers don't know how to deal with a striker.

That is true to a point. These days, there are more MMA practitioners that are comfortable on the ground and in stand-up fighting. Ground fighting needs to be addressed, as it seems your school does. :)

My point is; I try to assume the worst when dealing with a confrontation. The few times I made an assumption of weakness in my opponent, was when I learned the hard way not to. What you do and believe in, while training, will follow you in the real world.
 
K

Katie Simmons

Guest
Originally posted by Zoran
That is true to a point. These days, there are more MMA practitioners that are comfortable on the ground and in stand-up fighting. Ground fighting needs to be addressed, as it seems your school does. :)

My point is; I try to assume the worst when dealing with a confrontation. The few times I made an assumption of weakness in my opponent, was when I learned the hard way not to. What you do and believe in, while training, will follow you in the real world.


I wholeheartedly agree with you; it is always necessary to prepare for the worst. I didn't mean to imply that a ground fighter would just curl up into fetal position and weep for forgiveness if you used strikes on him. The point I was trying to make is that you should use your own strengths rather than playing your opponent's game. Striking is effective against any opponent; in my experience, it just tends to frustrate groundfighters more because they can't get close enough to take you down. In an actual altercation, I would not assume that my opponent was only a grappler and didn't know how to strike. But I sure as hell wouldn't stay on the ground to find out.
 

Zoran

Black Belt
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
689
Reaction score
21
Location
chicago area
Originally posted by Katie Simmons
I would not assume that my opponent was only a grappler and didn't know how to strike. But I sure as hell wouldn't stay on the ground to find out.

Agreed :asian:
 

kenmpoka

Blue Belt
Joined
May 23, 2002
Messages
218
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by Yiliquan1
It seems to me, not that I am a chuan fa/kempo/kenpo practitioner at all, that the bigger issue is one of linguistic fluency.

The argument, at least what there is of one, regarding the legitimate use of the phonetic representation of "kem(n)po" stems from the fact that we are all using the romanization of the sounds uttered in reference to the characters used, and trying to cite said romanization as the definitive transliteration for universal use...

Personally, regardless of what others say (and I have been on the receiving end of many peoples' rebuttals to what I am about to say), that a martial artist practicing an Asian martial art is failing in his or her education by not at least exploring some of the language of the country of origin of their art. If you study a Japanese art, learn some Japanese. If your art is Chinese, Indonesian, Filipino, then learn some of the appropriate language. If, for no other reason, than to sound authentic, a student almost has a responsibility to do so. Especially those who have their eye(s) on becoming an instructor one day. There is nothing worse in my book (as if my book were so large or important) than an instructor who is ignorant of some part of their art. An instructor should strive to master the physical technique, to become an authority on the historical relevance of his/her art, to be fully versed in the strategies and philosophies (if either exist) of his/her art, and to at least speak the relevant words and phrases in his/her art's mother tongue with some degree of fluency (i.e. correct pronunciation, correct grammar, correct understanding).

Just my 2 yen. Take it for what it is worth, or not.

Gambarimasu.
:asian:
Yiliquan1,

I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately since english is a universal language, many don't feel inclined to learn other languages and that is why there is such a gap in understanding other cultures. If one studies a foreign art, at least they should be famliar with basic vocabulary and terminology of their art.

Respectfully,
 

Matt Stone

Master of Arts
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
1,711
Reaction score
30
Location
Fort Lewis, Washington
Originally posted by kenmpoka
Yiliquan1,

I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately since english is a universal language, many don't feel inclined to learn other languages and that is why there is such a gap in understanding other cultures. If one studies a foreign art, at least they should be famliar with basic vocabulary and terminology of their art.

Respectfully,

Well, Peter, English is only universal to English speakers and those who have no choice but to deal with monolingual Americans...

It is my understanding that many Japanese (as an example) study English not so much because they want to, but because it is much more common for a Japanese to make the effort to speak English than it is for an American to speak Japanese...

Personally, I think foreign language study in public schools should start far earlier than the 8th grade, and should include more languages than French, German and Spanish. Given that the bulk of the world's population speaks Chinese (or some dialect of it), that would be a good start. I understand that there may be little practical use for it within the borders of the US, nor so much use in business relations. The point is simply that we are focusing on other languages that we do not necessarily (with the exception of Spanish) encounter on the corner of Main Street USA already, so why not go after others that are more widely spoken?

Whatever. I detest rabid monolingualism. While I am far from fluent in other languages, I can at least get around and feed myself in 2 - 3 besides English.

Gambarimasu.
:asian:
 

Latest Discussions

Top