Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Somebody considered the teachings sound; and, there are enough variations of kajukenbo to create such a debate. But not here.:ultracoolsomeone who is promoted to a Grand Master rank in Kajukenbo, can have an instructor who: (a) was never officially recognized as a black belt and (b) created and taught a system that was technically not Kajukenbo.
I hear what you're saying. But at what point does a variation of a variation of Kajukenbo become another art altogether?Somebody considered the teachings sound; and, there are enough variations of kajukenbo to create such a debate. But not here.:ultracool
Sean
someone who is promoted to a Grand Master rank in Kajukenbo, can have an instructor who: (a) was never officially recognized as a black belt and (b) created and taught a system that was technically not Kajukenbo.
It's coming from me, Prof. Bishop. Nothing that I've discussed on the Cafe.Just curious. Is this coming from you, or are you quoting someone?
It's coming from me, Prof. Bishop. Nothing that I've discussed on the Cafe.
Ron Baker
With that, I will ask a question here that I've asked elsewhere. And it goes toward the things I've complained about up-thread: now that cross-ranking and rank-chasing are a reality, what do we do now that they've slowed or stopped? Since we can't implement a mass Kaju "deportation" ....
what do you think about some kind of Kaju "amnesty"?
Kind regards,
Ron
Rank chasing and cross ranking has been going on since day 1. And it will continue as long as there are instructors willing to build their organizations by bringing in outsiders. Personally, I think cross ranking sucks. It's a insult to every Kaju man who earned his rank the right way.
I have a saying, those who have been in Kajukenbo long enough, know who came in the front door and paid for their rank with blood and sweat. And also know who came in the back door and paid for their rank with a check.
As to amnesty, I think we already have that too. Nobody has tried successfully to strip any cross ranks that were given in the past.
But even if everyone agrees on amnesty, amnesty will never buy these people the same respect and knowledge that others of their rank have earned. So other then commercial purposes, what good is rank without the respect of your peers?
Ironically, I think more and more people are counting on a continued dysfunction and vacuum in leadership, because it means that their peers have settled for the same. It's similar to not having the respect of your former peers at Enron. Yes, there were some good people who worked there, but it was still Enron.
I've only suggested amnesty because I didn't know of any other future-oriented action to take. It certainly wouldn't be popular with some (kind of like amnesty for illegal immigrants during the Pres. Reagan years was unpopular). But in the end, it was necessary. And in our case, it can also be useful. For instance:
Require that all cross-ranked BBs first acknowledge they were cross-ranked into Kaju;
Require that all rank advancements are frozen for x years;
Require that the cross-ranked BB's and their students pass a certification course of Kaju standards within x years;
Require continuing education every year after they pass certification.Just some thoughts.