Interesting,
Can you post what you feel is the correct...
Have met people in China, and Taiwan... who know the theory, but when examined they are not really doing or following
what they "know". Some are able to understand this after interacting with them and attempt to change, comfortable in "their" practice understanding what the pracice is to them do not...
I like to see and feel what others feel are correct, always looking for a deeper understanding of the practice, even those I may not agree with or share the same view points at this point in time...
In the practice of Taiji, it can take a long time to truly understand what one is training. Many begin their journey like a traveler walking through the fog of their own mind, drawn toward distant lights in search of wisdom—unaware that the true light has always been within them.
Wouldn’t fully agree with this answer… it’s interesting how, without examples, there can be a difference of meaning through words — while with examples, we might actually be describing the same thing using different ones.
True, there are a lot of ways to describe
intent (意, yì) — and most of them are just pointers.
The problem starts when the pointer becomes the focus, and the visualization replaces the experience not based on
results.
For me, intent isn’t aimed
at something — it’s the function of awareness itself.
When body and breath settle, awareness fills the movement naturally.
Whether you call it Dantian, Baihui, or “one principle,” they may all be describing the same thing — awareness organizing movement from stillness.
I was once told:
“Do not think of it, do not try to do it, or force it. In time, you will come to know it.”
What I’ve come to know is what I call focused awareness — awareness itself providing a feedback loop that allows the rest of the body and mind to organize around it.