Bob Hubbard said:
We've heard the hype "look for all the tropheys" and the catcalls, sour grapes, lineage and politics, but what really makes a good TKD school?
What should I as a potential student look for?
How about looking for my kids?
What advice would you as an experienced TKD practitioner give to the seeker?
Let's start first with what, IMHO, to avoid:
Schools with:
1. 18-24 Month Black Belts
2. 5-6 year old black belts
3. Large numbers of belt colours with frequent tests (new colour every six weeks!)
4. BLACK BELT CLUBS!!!
What to look for:
1. Black belt requires 3-5 years of serious study at the Dojang
2. Forms are sharp, crisp, and the people aren't standing up while doing them. Posture is good, the wrist is properly aligned during punching (I saw a McDojang Red belt/black belt test where students did reverse punches with their wrists obviously bent in a way to cause serious injury - to themselves), and the practioners BREATHE while doing the form.
3. Kukkiwon certification (this is nice, but not required. A lot of FINE independents want nothing to do with them).
4. Sparring looks like more than just a game of tag...
5. Who certified the instructor's instructor?
6. There are self-defence techniques taught at the Dojang that don't assume that you are warmed-up and in a sparring stance. Do they consider the possibility that you might be knocked to the ground?
7. For WOMEN. It is nice if the Dojang is able to offer a woman's only self-defence course. Many do, and you'd be surprised by what some of them teach. My traditional (pre-ITF) TKD instructor taught what can only be described as near military combatives with groundwork in his women's SD class.
8. Reputation. Ask around, starting at MT!
Ask TigerWoman. She really seems to know her TKD stuff.