What kind of knife is best for knife fighting?

Juany118

Senior Master
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,107
Reaction score
1,053
Good points. I've studied a few different FMA systems now, some more focused on the knife than others (Modern Arnis, a bit of Sayoc Kali, Lacoste-Inosanto Kali, Pekiti Tirsia Kali - PTI, and now Pekiti Tirsia Kali - PTKGO). Most of what I have seen with the knife, either in those systems, or in various demos of other "knife systems" is way too flashy and relies on things that pretty much no one will ever be able to pull off against a resisting opponent. Sadly, the stuff I've seen with the Karambit is just as bad. One of the major aspects I like about where I train now, compared to other systems I have trained and other things I have seen, is that the training is not that way.

The weapon hand moves fast, and while you don't have the manipulations that you do with the long weapon, you have enough that tracking it can be very challenging at close quarters. The disarms, defanging the snake, etc. are very unlikely unless you a) get lucky or b) are able to tap, trap, and lock (in that order) the weapon hand/arm first, which pretty much relies on a combination of many repetitions performed under pressure, and getting pretty darn lucky in that moment.

In my own personal skill set, I'm probably better with the knife and with empty hand against knife than I am anything else, and I wan't absolutely NO part in a knife fight or of going empty hand against knife. The skilled person is never going to allow you to touch their weapon hand, so getting a tap, trap, and lock is going to be all but impossible, which pretty much negates your chances of pulling off any of those pretty disarms that you see in demos. The unskilled person isn't going to be as concerned with protecting themselves, which means that they might be OK wtih trading shots or when you think you have your opening, they are willing to stab you right back because they don't recognize the danger (double kill). The person who has no formal training, but knows how to use the knife is going to ambush you and it will happen so fast that none of your fancy taps, etc. are going to happen, as there will simply be no time. Either way, it's a crap sandwich.

Despite my training and that it is probably my better skill-set, I don't hold any illusions of being some sort of "knife fighter". I'm just a middle-aged guy who wants to get home to my family if something bad were to happen. I train it because it gives me a better chance than if I don't.

All of that being said, I do enjoy talking about different knives as well as training, and am glad that threads like this exist! :)


I have certainly seen what you see as well, regarding knife stuff (sometimes being too flashy) it's even in my school but as part of something. My Inosanto Kali Lineage is a little weird. It passes from Master at Arm's James Keating to my Guro. This not only lead to some more Spanish sword influence but a "quirk" of Keatings. He taught my Guro, and thus I am taught, with the following method. We first learn a complicated and/or flashy method. Then we are taught the "clean" unflashy method. Keatings thought on that was that if you teach the student the complicated way first when you teach them the simple method the "light bulb" will go off and the simple method "sticks.". I don't have any FMA experience outside of my school however so I don't know how common, or uncommon, this idea is.

I also don't hold illusions of being a knife fighter. In terms of "fighting" i look at the knife training as very useful because in learning to "fight" with a knife I learn to better defend long enough to transition to my firearm (thinking work.) I am what I would call a fair "dueler"/sparrer though (with stick and sword too) but that is likely because I spent many years fencing. That gave me an appreciation for what some might call "dancing" but "dancing" only works if both opponents already have their weapons openly at the ready. That's why I say "sparring is pressure testing, not fighting" because as often as not "fighting" starts with a surprise attack. Here is a video that I think illustrates what I am talking about a bit dueling vs fighting... "Prepared" vs "natural position" to get surprise.

 

Charlemagne

Black Belt
Joined
Jun 19, 2016
Messages
691
Reaction score
245
Location
Texas, USA
I have certainly seen what you see as well, regarding knife stuff (sometimes being too flashy) it's even in my school but as part of something. My Inosanto Kali Lineage is a little weird. It passes from Master at Arm's James Keating to my Guro. This not only lead to some more Spanish sword influence but a "quirk" of Keatings. He taught my Guro, and thus I am taught, with the following method. We first learn a complicated and/or flashy method. Then we are taught the "clean" unflashy method. Keatings thought on that was that if you teach the student the complicated way first when you teach them the simple method the "light bulb" will go off and the simple method "sticks.". I don't have any FMA experience outside of my school however so I don't know how common, or uncommon, this idea is.

I haven't seen it the way you describe in any of the places I have trained unless the fancy version was being shown as a demo, but that is not a criticism, just an observation. We start clean and simple and then build on that later. Again, it's pretty hard to get a disarm if you can't even get control of the limb. I've heard Guro Dan say in the past that disarms are incidental if not accidental. However, when I trained in Modern Arnis, Sayoc Kali, or even Lacoste-Inosanto Kali, we did a ton of time on defanging and disarming. Since I have been training in PTK, we rarely train those things. They come pretty late in the system to begin with, so it is implied that you have solid basics, know how to manage distance with footwork, and understand timing. It's also implied that you have the ability to perform a tap correctly (as an attack).

I also don't hold illusions of being a knife fighter. In terms of "fighting" i look at the knife training as very useful because in learning to "fight" with a knife I learn to better defend long enough to transition to my firearm (thinking work.) I am what I would call a fair "dueler"/sparrer though (with stick and sword too) but that is likely because I spent many years fencing. That gave me an appreciation for what some might call "dancing" but "dancing" only works if both opponents already have their weapons openly at the ready. That's why I say "sparring is pressure testing, not fighting" because as often as not "fighting" starts with a surprise attack. Here is a video that I think illustrates what I am talking about a bit dueling vs fighting... "Prepared" vs "natural position" to get surprise.

I certainly can't disagree with any of that. The knife is an ambush weapon most of the time. If I only have empty hands and the other guy has a weapon, I need to survive the initial assault long enough to get to my own weapon. In order to do that, I need to react in a simple and aggressive manner, and I better have footwork to control the distance. If he has one knife, I want two, or a long weapon, or a gun, etc.
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
23,337
Reaction score
8,070
Starting from bottom to top. I study FMA (Inosanto Kali to be specific). Also after 20 years as a LEO in a bad town I have seen more than my fair share of stabbings and slashings, some fatal. I also test my blades when I first get them on analogues (before I cook them of course) lamb thighs are my favorite but I have used pork as well. I have also used the karambit to dress game while hunting and Brian above already spoke of watching it used to harvest and tear a coconut open, not an unworthy feat. I believe he also uses it quite effectively for utility tasks. This actually makes sense to me because in the Philippines, where the blade is called a lihok, its original purpose was as a tool but as many tribal cultures do it got turned into a weapon by necessity.

As for the sword comment, that is irrelevant to this thread because we are talking about fighting knives, not swords.


Now I will partially agree with you on one point. I feel a karambit FOLDER is tacticool, I would never use one as anything more than a box cutter. Lacking a double edged limits your angles of attack when held in the pikal grip and makes it basically useless as a flail. I would also apply that to some of the more outrageous "custom" designs that limit stabbing ability even more without a payoff in better slashing ability. However a Traditional double edged, robust, full tang, karambit/lihok, (like I pictured in a previous post) while having some disadvantages, as any design does, is effective in the hands of someone trained to use it, especially in terms of laceration because that curved design is purpose built to cut things.

I mostly used karabits for trickery. Like balisongs. I mean I can still knife you with one. But I can knife you with a screwdriver.

But a lot of the trapping , hooking and assorted trickery I am never going to use. I never encountered anyone else who used a knife in that manner. These people spar almost never use curved blade stuff.

A bit of defang and that is probably it.

I wouldn't get one just for coconuts.
 

Mephisto

Black Belt
Joined
Sep 26, 2014
Messages
594
Reaction score
236
If we’re talking practical use the only blade that matters is one that will save your life (physically and keep you out of prison). Legality has little to do with it, if you carry a specialized “fighting” knife or anything that can Be construed as a dedicated weapon you’ll be at the mercy of a jury and the opinion of the lay-person. If your tactical karambit is legal carry in your state the lay-people in your jury won’t care. You carried a specific type of weapon which can imply specific intent to some. Best to carry a ultility knife that can be found at any local sport/hardware store and can more readily one presented as a weapon of opportunity.
 

Juany118

Senior Master
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,107
Reaction score
1,053
If we’re talking practical use the only blade that matters is one that will save your life (physically and keep you out of prison). Legality has little to do with it, if you carry a specialized “fighting” knife or anything that can Be construed as a dedicated weapon you’ll be at the mercy of a jury and the opinion of the lay-person. If your tactical karambit is legal carry in your state the lay-people in your jury won’t care. You carried a specific type of weapon which can imply specific intent to some. Best to carry a ultility knife that can be found at any local sport/hardware store and can more readily one presented as a weapon of opportunity.

Let me say first this is just based on 30 years as a cop (literally to the date as of this month). If you use a knife in self defense you have to be justified in using lethal force, by your State Law. So if you were allowed to use a straight blade in an encounter, and you State's law doesn't prohibit karambits, do not sweat it. Why?

In most States, if not all, there is Preliminary hearing which is only before a Judge, no Jury at the magistrate level. After that you can request a Habeus at the Common Pleas level (a second bite at the prelim) again just in front of a Judge. Then, if for some reason two Judges ignored your State Law doesn't prohibit such a blade (very unlikely) you can request a Bench trial. This means no Jury, just the Judge making a decision on law. People keep saying "omg Juries!!!" That's really a non-issue.

The answer is learn the specifics of your State's and Municipalities laws. In terms of weapons bearing the system actually works well, you just have to know what the laws around you say. Then make sure you only deploy it, as it's deadly force, when is justified. It's really not that complicated.
 

Juany118

Senior Master
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,107
Reaction score
1,053
Let me say first this is just based on 30 years as a cop (literally to the date as of this month). If you use a knife in self defense you have to be justified in using lethal force, by your State Law. So if you were allowed to use a straight blade in an encounter, and you State's law doesn't prohibit karambits, do not sweat it. Why?

In most States, if not all, there is Preliminary hearing which is only before a Judge, no Jury at the magistrate level. After that you can request a Habeus at the Common Pleas level (a second bite at the prelim) again just in front of a Judge. Then, if for some reason two Judges ignored your State Law doesn't prohibit such a blade (very unlikely) you can request a Bench trial. This means no Jury, just the Judge making a decision on law. People keep saying "omg Juries!!!" That's really a non-issue.

The answer is learn the specifics of your State's and Municipalities laws. In terms of weapons bearing the system actually works well, you just have to know what the laws around you say. Then make sure you only deploy it, as it's deadly force, when is justified. It's really not that complicated.

Edit Dang typo.. 20 years. Sleep drprived posting lol. But the main take away is,

1. Know you knife laws.
2. Understand that when you use a knife in self defense it's best to ask "if I had a gun would I be justified in shooting the person" because a knife is lethal force.

#2 is actually more important than #1 imo because if you screw up #2 it doesn't matter what knife you are carrying.
 

Latest Discussions

Top