Midnight-shadow
3rd Black Belt
I'm curious on what people's opinion on tricking is, and whether they consider it a valid form of Martial Arts. For those who don't know what I'm talking about, watch this video:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It looks like fun, and requires a lot of skill. It has more in common with gymnastics than combat.I'm curious on what people's opinion on tricking is, and whether they consider it a valid form of Martial Arts. For those who don't know what I'm talking about, watch this video:
It looks like fun, and requires a lot of skill. It has more in common with gymnastics than combat.
It's almost a cross between Martial Arts, Gymnastics and Dance. I guess the real question is what is the difference between dancing, gymnastics and Martial Arts. All 3 follow similar actions and body movements, to the point where you can take many Martial Arts and turn them into a dance. Is the only difference in the intent of the actions? For example, the guy in the video is not aiming to fight anyone, but could very easily turn the skills and techniques he has into a fight.
It is an excellent and valid form of martial art influenced gymnastics. Excellent body control, balance, explosive leg power. What happens when there is an opponent punching and kicking at the same time.
I strongly recommend my students do run...everyday. Those fighters I train do run. Does running increase their fighting skills? Not specifically but it does increase their aerobic cardio and sprints greatly help with their anaerobic cardio tremendously. Then again runners who have never trained have good aerobic cardio but their fight skills are mostly poor. Same with martial gymnastics for the most part unless they are actually drilling and sparring against an opponent while doing so.
Yes, the main difference is intent. Martial arts should (with some notable exceptions) focus on efficient movements designed to do specific things (injure, break balance, block, evade, etc.). Gymnastics should focus on showing what the human body can do with balance, high coordination, and strength. Dance is typically focused on grace, though much urban dance incorporates a lot of the principles of floor routines from gymnastics.It's almost a cross between Martial Arts, Gymnastics and Dance. I guess the real question is what is the difference between dancing, gymnastics and Martial Arts. All 3 follow similar actions and body movements, to the point where you can take many Martial Arts and turn them into a dance. Is the only difference in the intent of the actions? For example, the guy in the video is not aiming to fight anyone, but could very easily turn the skills and techniques he has into a fight.
That depends upon the criteria you use to define "valid". Some would say MA are only "valid" if they are combat-tested (which rules out nearly all). Some will say only if they are fight-tested (which typically rules out all but sports). Others will say they must be focused on defensive combat (which rules out most sport).There are a lot of different sports that benefit others but are otherwise unrelated. A classic example of this is Ballet helping Soccer players. Are they going to go out onto the field and start ballet dancing? No, but the balance and coordination they develop from doing Ballet will help them in their Soccer play. Just because skills or physical attributes can be transferred from one sport to another doesn't mean they are the same. The question still stands? Is tricking a valid form of Martial Art and if not, then why?
In my opinion, they are all three quite different. Very different biomechanics, to accomplish different things, even if they appear similar on a superficial level. In my experience, dancers can have some real difficulting training into martial arts. They can't Make the switch in the biomechanics. They also get frustrated if they are an accomplished dancer, they can "do the moves" of the martial art, but it's still all wrong. Some of them don't like being told that.It's almost a cross between Martial Arts, Gymnastics and Dance. I guess the real question is what is the difference between dancing, gymnastics and Martial Arts. All 3 follow similar actions and body movements, to the point where you can take many Martial Arts and turn them into a dance. Is the only difference in the intent of the actions? For example, the guy in the video is not aiming to fight anyone, but could very easily turn the skills and techniques he has into a fight.
That depends upon the criteria you use to define "valid". Some would say MA are only "valid" if they are combat-tested (which rules out nearly all). Some will say only if they are fight-tested (which typically rules out all but sports). Others will say they must be focused on defensive combat (which rules out most sport).
I don't like questions about validity, because we each tend to have our own place to draw that line. I tend to differentiate among martial sports/combat sports (MMA, kickboxing, boxing, wrestling, fencing, etc.), self-defense systems (Krav Maga, etc.), self-defense arts (NGA, etc.) and esoteric styles (this is a loose category for those that seem to have no direct martial. defensive, or sport application for the physical movements they teach). Even within these - being my own categories - the distinctions are tenuous.
Don Angiers (quoted previously) told me he preferred his students to have dance experience, because they'd have better balance, grace, and ability to keep their weight centered. At the same time, I can see where an experienced classical dancer might have issues, because their mechanics are mostly around balance and appearance - if a dance move looks right, it probably is. With MA, looking right and working are not synonymous.In my opinion, they are all three quite different. Very different biomechanics, to accomplish different things, even if they appear similar on a superficial level. In my experience, dancers can have some real difficulting training into martial arts. They can't Make the switch in the biomechanics. They also get frustrated if they are an accomplished dancer, they can "do the moves" of the martial art, but it's still all wrong. Some of them don't like being told that.
Yeah, modern dancers have the problems too. That dance background gives some real advantages, but also some very real disadvantages. It can be a real mixed bag. People assume it would be a benefit. Sometimes it is, but sometimes it is a detriment.Don Angiers (quoted previously) told me he preferred his students to have dance experience, because they'd have better balance, grace, and ability to keep their weight centered. At the same time, I can see where an experienced classical dancer might have issues, because their mechanics are mostly around balance and appearance - if a dance move looks right, it probably is. With MA, looking right and working are not synonymous.