Last Fearner
2nd Black Belt
Since this topic was brought up in another thread,
http://martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45402
I am starting this thread to address this issue.
Feel free to respectfully express your opinions on the subject.
Here is mine:
Kicking to the head is a viable option. It is no more risky than any strike with the hand when done properly by a skilled technician, at the appropriate time.
Since you brought it up, interesting proposal though. In fact, after reading this, I tried an experiment. I went out and ran up to 100 different strangers and punched them in the toe. Not one time was i crashed into or overtaken. Of course, for a few of them I threw a class of water in their face first; some I sprayed with silly string; others I used dirt to distract them. For about half of them, though, I first did a high roundhouse kick to the side of their head, followed by a jump-spin side kick to their nose before I dropped down for the toe punch. So, I guess the toe punch is an effective form of attack if you know when to use it, and how to set it up.
As for kicking to the head, it is one thing to say, "I don't do prefer to do it," but to categorically denounce the practice as dangerous or excessively risky shows a lack of training on the subject and a failure to thoroughly understand the method of kicking multiple targets.
I have used kicks to the head in street self defense, and never had a problem with it. The illogical approach of "upper-body weapons for upper body targets, and lower body weapons for lower body targets" limits options, and has no sound validity in its argument. First of all, people tend to think of a fist as held by the face and a foot as being on the ground - quite a distance apart. However, if I extend my punch horizontally, and extend my side kick horizontally, both are attached to my torso. One is at the shoulder, and the other is at the hip; only a couple of feet apart. There is no great difficulty in adjusting the angle of trajectory to punch from my shoulder down to the abdomen, or from my hip up to the head.
If you are willing to punch someone in the face, then you are risking counter-attack when you come close enough that their hand technique can strike you. By kicking effectively, I can remain far enough away that your punch can not land, but I can knock you out. If you want to cling to the fantasy that you can somehow be superior in your skills, and that you can safely rush in past my kick, while avoiding being kicked in the face, slammed with a side kick in the solar plexus, or having a knee dislocated, then you still have my hands to worry about. You don't just get a free pass to rush in - - that's not safe, and you don't keep your health for long that way.
Being cautious, you must stay out of my striking range, which includes my kicking range, and that means you have to stay further back - - which is fine with me. Any attempt to rush in is more noticeable the further back you are. Any attempt to sneak your way in places you at striking range. A fast rush would be met with fast hand or foot strike and you never know which one, where its coming from, or where it is going to land.
Lastly, if you understand anything about unarmed combat, you know that you typically do not lead in with your most powerful technique. You jab, you stun, you daze them and set them up for the finishing blow. Once an opponent has been struck with the hands, and they are seeing stars but are not completely out, it only takes a split second to nail them with a powerful kick to the head which finishes the job without any resistance, or undue risk. No one of any skill ever said you are going to look eye-to-eye with an opponent and kick them in the head with no set-up, no distraction, or without taking advantage of proper timing.
Kicks are good - - use them wisely.
CM D.J. Eisenhart
http://martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45402
I am starting this thread to address this issue.
Feel free to respectfully express your opinions on the subject.
Here is mine:
Kicking to the head is a viable option. It is no more risky than any strike with the hand when done properly by a skilled technician, at the appropriate time.
Why not practice running up to a guy and punching him in the toe? I can offer some reasons...it causes you to compromise your mechanics; it's strategically a bad idea as it leaves you vulnerable to being crashed into and overtaken, just for starts.
Since you brought it up, interesting proposal though. In fact, after reading this, I tried an experiment. I went out and ran up to 100 different strangers and punched them in the toe. Not one time was i crashed into or overtaken. Of course, for a few of them I threw a class of water in their face first; some I sprayed with silly string; others I used dirt to distract them. For about half of them, though, I first did a high roundhouse kick to the side of their head, followed by a jump-spin side kick to their nose before I dropped down for the toe punch. So, I guess the toe punch is an effective form of attack if you know when to use it, and how to set it up.
As for kicking to the head, it is one thing to say, "I don't do prefer to do it," but to categorically denounce the practice as dangerous or excessively risky shows a lack of training on the subject and a failure to thoroughly understand the method of kicking multiple targets.
Kicking to the head creates the same problems. Use upper-body weapons for upper body targets, and lower body weapons for lower body targets. You get to keep your health longer that way.
I have used kicks to the head in street self defense, and never had a problem with it. The illogical approach of "upper-body weapons for upper body targets, and lower body weapons for lower body targets" limits options, and has no sound validity in its argument. First of all, people tend to think of a fist as held by the face and a foot as being on the ground - quite a distance apart. However, if I extend my punch horizontally, and extend my side kick horizontally, both are attached to my torso. One is at the shoulder, and the other is at the hip; only a couple of feet apart. There is no great difficulty in adjusting the angle of trajectory to punch from my shoulder down to the abdomen, or from my hip up to the head.
If you are willing to punch someone in the face, then you are risking counter-attack when you come close enough that their hand technique can strike you. By kicking effectively, I can remain far enough away that your punch can not land, but I can knock you out. If you want to cling to the fantasy that you can somehow be superior in your skills, and that you can safely rush in past my kick, while avoiding being kicked in the face, slammed with a side kick in the solar plexus, or having a knee dislocated, then you still have my hands to worry about. You don't just get a free pass to rush in - - that's not safe, and you don't keep your health for long that way.
Being cautious, you must stay out of my striking range, which includes my kicking range, and that means you have to stay further back - - which is fine with me. Any attempt to rush in is more noticeable the further back you are. Any attempt to sneak your way in places you at striking range. A fast rush would be met with fast hand or foot strike and you never know which one, where its coming from, or where it is going to land.
Lastly, if you understand anything about unarmed combat, you know that you typically do not lead in with your most powerful technique. You jab, you stun, you daze them and set them up for the finishing blow. Once an opponent has been struck with the hands, and they are seeing stars but are not completely out, it only takes a split second to nail them with a powerful kick to the head which finishes the job without any resistance, or undue risk. No one of any skill ever said you are going to look eye-to-eye with an opponent and kick them in the head with no set-up, no distraction, or without taking advantage of proper timing.
Kicks are good - - use them wisely.
CM D.J. Eisenhart