Originally posted by gozanryu
Matt, I am curious. What is your point with your last post? Are you asking Sensei Phelps to restate what he's already stated? Do you know his birthdate. (I am assuming you do as you are extrapolating a timeline.)
No, I don't know a birthdate... However, since you are only eligible for miilitary service at around 17 to 18 years of age, and given the extraordinarily time consuming claims he has made, I figured I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he started early... He said he was Special Forces in the Army in Vietnam, and then transferred to the Navy, on to BUDs, then on to officer training (of some sort - don't know what kind yet), then back to the SEALs. That racks up
at least 10 to 12 years absolute bare minimum... My original comment of 7 - 10 was based just on the Navy time (I didn't think through the Army time too well when I posted).
And I'm not asking him to relate what he has already posted _ I'm asking for details to a timeline he hasn't touched on at all.
Lets start here.
"Where is the name "Kawika" from? Is it a birth name, or a name you either assumed or was "given" to you?"
Huh? I thought you read through the web site.
I haven't read through the entire thing. I had other things to do. But if that is where the answer lies, I will surely rush right over there to discover that name's hidden truths...
"Can you provide dates? Years would be fine, actually... You see, most civilians couldn't tell the difference between enlisted and officers, and folks that cite their military experience as some form of qualification for their martial arts skills really perturb me. Especially since HTH is really not something regular troops worry about, and even though SOF folks train in it quite a bit, they are far from being "martial arts masters"
What? Why? And where does he state that his SOF creditials equal Ninjitsu mastery?
Why provide dates? Well, see, when someone tries to pass off their secret special ops background as some sort of qualifier for their martial skills, I start asking questions - like why is their martial history in need of such supporting storyline? Why doesn't their martial history have the ability to stand on its own? Stories about special forces folks being martial arts masters starts making me wonder if the Dark Warrior was really Chiun of Sinanju fame... Dates serve to show how long he was in and at what ranks. Lots of folks like to drop "chief instructor of XXXX base" as their claim to fame, when in fact they just happened to be the person that was available to sign a NAF contract with that installation to teach MA to the kids at the youth center... So the rank he was and for how long has bearing on his claims to military experience relevant to his martial arts background.
As for "where does he state that his SOF credentials equal Ninjitsu master," well, he
is the one listing his background, and anyone that is reading it is surely intended to infer that his background has developed him somehow, especially since he extrapolates his training and military background in a related storyline, i.e. "he has made use of his skills in real world situations," or words to that effect.
SOF or any other military credentials mean precisely Richard as far as martial arts skills go... We don't train to fight that way, even when we do train in HTH. We have firearms, heavy artillery, armored vehicles and tanks to do the fighting. There just isn't all that much room in doctrine to allow for ranks of martial arts warriors waltzing across the battlefield to participate in mortal combat with the enemy... Much easier to call in arty and let HE do the work.
"That'd mean you got out somewhere around 28 years old. When did you find time to get your BA or BS to allow you to transfer to the officer corps, or were you a warrant officer? Or were you just a petty officer, noncommissioned type?"
Why would it mean that? Also, he lists the Universities he attended on the Web site. Why dont you do the research and post the results here?
First, as I stated above, I am giving him the earliest possible time to have joined the military. Being that I have been active duty for the last 11 years, I can attest to the inherent difficulty in obtaining a BA/BS while on active duty. For a combat soldier from Vietnam, and then a Navy SEAL to have gotten a BA/BS in under a decade would infer that either he didn't participate in a lot of training, or that he went to the school but didn't do the job... Since his SEAL claim checked out, it would lead me to believe that he didn't do too much work
as a SEAL, since regular military training, deployments, sea duty, would all restrict his ability to go to school regularly (not to mention the fact that he would likely only have lunch and after duty hours to attend classes).
Second, since
I'm not the one making the claims, it really isn't
my job to have to find out the documentation to support the claims...
See, I work in the Army JAG Corps. When the prosecutor alleges something, the defense counsel only has to show reasonable doubt to cause the allegations to become suspect... I see my position as the defense counsel, not the prosecutor. Mr. Phelps is presenting an allegation that he did such and so. I have no personal heartburn, but I certainly would like to see some more detailed documentation to prove he claims. I can argue that I am able to provide reasonable doubt by displaying that a timeline of very generous parameters discounts the ability to have invested much in the way of time and effort toward obtaining the lofty grades and positions he claims. As the allegations are
his, he bears the burden of proof... All I have to do is poke holes in the story.
"How long did you work for the CIA? It would seem that would eat up another few years, what with training and all..."
Again, do you have evidence that he (Phelps) was NOT in the CIA?
Again, not my problem to prove he was or wasn't. I just have to prove reasonable doubt. And why would a former CIA operative either a) publicly announce his involvement in such activities, or b) think that such activities had anything to do with his martial arts background? It sounds like just more hype and fluff to make the alleged ninja master sound more mysterious and spooky to the uninitiated, ignorant civilian with no knowledge nor experience with the backgrounds Mr. Phelps claims.
"additional BA (since you had to have one to qualify for an officer's commission earlier in your career), then two Master's degrees... That's at least 5 or 6 years there, depending on how much of your prior BA/BS credits transferred over to the new school's curriculum"
See above. You check it out.
See above. Not my place to prove or disprove, just to bring in a little doubt...
"Many years training under Bow Sim Mark... Quite a respectable claim"
Why dont you call Sifu Mark at her Boston Dojo and ask her?
I feel like we are playing Ring Around the Rosy with this line of argument... Perhaps I will do just that, however...
"I'm not trying to ambush you or attack you. You make claims that seem to be larger than life, and your alleged history sounds more at home in a novel or B-movie than in the reality that we all share. If you were amenable to answering my questions, I am sure it would go a long way toward convincing any naysayers that your background is legitimate."
You sir, are a liar. (no offense) You are DEFINITELY attacking him. It is funny to hear you call someone (oh, I'm sorry, INFER) a liar, and then try to sound as if you are genuine in your intent.
Think what you like, Mr. My Profile Says Nothing At All. You joined MT on the day after I posted my questions to Mr. Phelps. That leads me to believe you could possibly be in his camp. Fine. It could also be believed that you are either one of his students, or Mr. Phelps himself. The Mods can prove or disprove that. Wouldn't be the first time such a thing has happened. Whatever.
If I were really attacking him, I would have come right out and said he was a fraud. Note the encouragement I give in the whole "it'll go a long way toward convincing any naysayers that your backgorund is legitimate" comment. I don't need to call him a fraud. His actions or inactions will define that for me. He will either provide proof, or he won't. Both situations are inevitable, and in the case of one my suppositions will be proven incorrect, and in the other they will be proven correct.
Call me some more names... And be creative next time, huh?
You have jumped on a bandwagon to disparrage someone you would not recognize if they walked in your Dojo. You are trying to infer a lack of credibility because YOU find his Bio incredulous? Huh? So be it. Go out, do the research, and expose all of the frauds here. Of course, if you have any honor, you will naturally have to come here and say so if you find his Military carreer, Govt. carrer, and school creditials to be legit. (let me save you some time, they are) Now, as far as the "legitamacy of the Art itself. Gees, no, its not Bujinkan, or any Takamatsuden tradition. If you want to read scads of threads on it, go over to e-budo and check it out. Even Don Roley might agree that that horse has been whipped to death.
I would recognize him - saw the pics on his site. I am sure I'm not the only person with a little commons sense that thinks his background sounds more at home in a Remo Williams novel than in real life. Especially given the time I have spent working for the Government (it really isn't as glamorous as the movies make it out to be). If I found out he was legitimate, believe me I would be the first one to state so publicly - but since you haven't known me beyond the past few days, you would have no record of who I am, what I am about, or how I behave in public forum - ask around, folks will support the fact that I am the first one to admit when I am wrong, and do so loud, up front, and in public... G'head, ask... I dare ya.
As for the legitimacy of "ninja" schools, I will say for the record that I think the so-called "ninja" schools are a bunch of hooey. I don't believe, for a single minute, that they are "authentic" traditions. Every "ninja master" has had an extensive MA background known publicly before they became known as "ninja." Sure, go ahead, use the convenient excuse that "that's how ninjas operate - you never know their secrets" or some other Hollywood crap. I don't believe the Bujinkan or any of the splinter groups therefrom are legitimate ryuha. But if folks want to run about thinking they are ninja, that's just fine. My 7 year old son does it, so why can't they?
My point is this. YOu say that He "Burns your @$$" Really, when did you speak with him? You say you have first hand, 2nd hand information. Buddy! Dont be a jerk! Check it out for your self. Call him, e-mail him, better yet, talk to the MANY students who(m) have studied under him and found it valuable.
Why email him? Can't we talk publicly right here? Why call him? This is a suitable enough forum, and it allows him to think out his responses and reply intelligently instead of being put on the spot. I wouldn't ask students, since 90% of them have no idea what they are getting into when they join a school, and often have no knowledge of the "outside world" while training in that school... Students are regularly and daily defrauded and bilked of time, effort, sweat and cash. It'd be like asking devout Moonies if they though Rev. Moon was legit - like they'd know.
I look forward to your responses, Mr. Phelps' responses, both, or neither... All are inevitable anyway...
Gambarimasu.
:asian: