Small Breasts lead to pedophilia, Aussie Senator claims.

CanuckMA said:
OK, so we set a minimum breast size, say 38DDD, and anyone smaller gets free implants. :ultracool
Click to expand...

I'm all for it! Oh and all women must wear white t shirts all year round!

Tell you what, next time I'm at party HQ in Ottawa I'll even bring it up...anyone want to bet how quickly i'll be out on my *** after that discussion? :)
 
Carol said:
Therefore if most sexually violent predators are paoedophiles, that dos NOT mean that all paedophiles are sexually violent predators.
Click to expand...

I don't think I said that. If I did, I certainly apologize. I said that most of the people locked up under civil confinement laws are pedophiles who are sexual predators. Not rapists, not other 'violent' criminals.

In addition, the sex offender registry has different levels that address the criminal's risk to re-offend.
Click to expand...

And again, we apply this to sexual predators, not bank robbers or murderers. They have a high risk of re-offending too, but we do not hold them after their sentences are up.
http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=eopster...ps&b=terminalcontent&f=sorb_levels&csid=Eeops
It's that whole biology thang. :lol: There is a difference between a child and an adult, and that difference is much greater than the difference between an older adult and a younger adult. Exploiting a child that may not have the tools or the knowledge to understand what is going on is clearly not normal behaviour.
Click to expand...

I think you're arguing that pedophilia is bad. I agree, it is bad.

I am saying that IN ADDITION to it being bad, our culture has a definite predilection towards sex with the young - not the underage, but definitely the very young. It's in our advertising, and it would not be there if it wasn't a selling point. If the thought of a middle-aged guy getting his freak on with Brittney Spears when she was going through that "I'm not that innocent" routine when she was about 17 or 18 wasn't that, then what was it? So we place a value on sexual contact with the young in our culture - but we draw a line when it goes too young - and punish those who cross it out of proportion with the way we punish others who commit even more horrific acts of violence. I agree that an 18 year old is legally an adult, but they don't suddenly grow brains and common sense the day after their birthdays. We just don't legally protect them from being preyed upon by older adults, is all.

And again, look at the situation - we're not talking about longer prison terms for sex offenders, especially pedophiles. That would be perfectly understandable. We're talking about people who are tried, found guilty, given prison sentences, serve those sentences, and then are never released for the rest of their lives, under civil commitment laws that we do NOT apply to bank robbers or murderers. If the problem is that child molestation is the worst of the worst and society needs to be protected from child molesters, then why not just have life sentences with no possibility of parole? Why have 10 years sentences and then refuse to let them go when they've served their time? What's up with that?
 
Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia.
Click to expand...

Couple of comments here....

1. Small breasts are normal and natural.
2. I see a girl with small breasts I don't think "8 yr old", I think small breasts. (I see a girl with large ones, I think large ones, etc. breasts are a body part, not the woman.)
3. There is nothing "Pedo" here other than the Senator's mind.
4. A small breasted woman dressed up in a school girl outfit, a girl scout uniform, or a cheerleader get up is a nice fantasy. It's not a gateway to hanging out at the local school with a hidden camera or a white van with some duct-tape and a stained mattress inside.

Maybe a bare pubic mound should be outlawed next. Hey, after all, Adult women have furry crotches, and it's only pre-teens that are bare down there.

So all you women who shave it all off....stop making me think you're an 8 yr old when I photograph you au-natural. I'd hate to piss off a prude government type, Aussie, German, Brit or Yank.

Then again, maybe they want to consider outlawing bikini waxing, pigtails for the over 18s, and require all a-cups to be mandatory augmented to at least a c-cup.....
 
Ken Morgan said:
Really? You guys don’t have a way of keeping people in?

We’ve got “Dangerous Offender Status”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_offender#United_States

Not perfect but it keeps some of them in for a very long time.
Click to expand...

yep yep *cough* paul bernardo *cough*

sick piece of douchenozzle who'll not see daylight again (and rightly so) because he was put under our dangerous offender status. its not used often here in canada (should be used more i think sometimes) but sometimes it is.
 
Blade96 said:
yep yep *cough* paul bernardo *cough*

sick piece of douchenozzle who'll not see daylight again (and rightly so) because he was put under our dangerous offender status. its not used often here in canada (should be used more i think sometimes) but sometimes it is.
Click to expand...

Let's not use the ends to justify the means. Horrible people should be put away for good, or even put to death, right? I think we can all agree with that. There are ways to do that - death sentences and natural life sentences that do not offer any possibility of parole. Civil confinement after a sentence is completed is like asking for a mulligan - oops, we screwed up, we should have put you away forever, but since your prison term is up, we're just going to keep you locked up anyway. It might seem like a smart move with a dirtbag such as the man you mentioned above, but the problem with such administrative indefinite confinements is that they can theoretically be applied to a wide range of persons, perhaps undeserving. If they belong in prison for life, sentence them to that.

A prison sentence is a term given as punishment for a crime. Imposed by either a judge or a jury on a guilty person, it is meant to represent the term that the person will be removed from society. Why would it be OK to ignore that ruling and keep a person in prison forever without new charges or convictions, just because of what they 'might' do? If they are that dangerous, sentence them to life and be done with it. No need to make a mockery of the law.
 
Actually, after giving this further thought, I think further study is required. I seek the services of 100 small breasted petite women who shave their neither regions. Shorter gals are preferred as is a youthful appearance. You will be provided with various costumes as listed in a previous post, and spend part of the time in various partial and full states of undress with me. After 1 week of intense and extreme exposure (pun intended) I will then be transported to St. Teresa's School for Wayward Teen Girls, and left at their mercy's for another whole week. We can fund this experiment through the US Stimulus programs (aptly named here).

Let us see if such intense exposure to small breasted young looking women turns me into a vile and despicable pedophile or if there is something else at work here, like a defect that doesn't allow someone to tell right from wrong.
 
Tez3 said:
Does one have to be Australian to join the Sex Party?


I was nearly Australian, my parents applied for the £10 emigration but changed their minds at the last minute.
Click to expand...


... I wonder what their conventions and gatherings are like...
 
something to think about and I haven't come to definite conclusions myself, is that the two boys who here were recently sentenced for attacking, torturing and nearly killing two other small boys were watching porn films from a very early age, these included some very violent secual acts and also the 'golden showrs' type of thing which they made the boys they attacked act out. I haven't known any child or children before who have sexually abused other children like this.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/8473978.stm
 
The problem I have with some of these studies, and expert opinions is, they're often debunked later. Rock n Roll will turn you evil. Heavy Metal fans are devil worshipers. It was DnD that made Columbine happen. Watch porn and you become a sex fiend and rape puppies. Not saying the one Arch listed is bad (haven't read it yet), but that I find most of them biased from the start.

I think some people are just "wrong" or defective as it were, and no amount of "good" or "god" will change that.
 
Short drop and a sudden stop.
Fence off a few hundred acres, toss them in and let them work it out among themselves.
There's options, not all of which are popular ones.

But criminalizing something that thousands enjoy safely and properly because a small handful screw it up...doesn't sit right with me.
 
Tez3 said:
I was nearly Australian, my parents applied for the £10 emigration but changed their minds at the last minute.
Click to expand...
Australia's loss! Bugger!!
icon7.gif
 
I've always found Aussies to be straight talking common sense people so it's a bit of a surprise to find they have idiots who are concerned in this way about breast size.
 
Tez3 said:
I've always found Aussies to be straight talking common sense people so it's a bit of a surprise to find they have idiots who are concerned in this way about breast size.
Click to expand...

nutbars are everywhere......
all countries and continents have them. Unfortunately. Sigh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The Forfeiture Racket

Previous Thread

Laser fusion test results raise energy hopes

Next Thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top