SC cop fights with deputies after getting ticketed

Bob Hubbard

Retired
MT Mentor
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 4, 2001
Messages
47,245
Reaction score
772
Location
Land of the Free
SC cop fights with deputies after getting ticketed
Christine Phinney fought with officers after being pulled over for speeding


SUMMERVILLE, S.C. — Angered and bloody after being chased for speeding on Christmas Eve, an off-duty North Charleston police officer questioned why her pursuers hadn't simply given a fellow officer a free pass.

Officer Christine Phinney told a Dorchester County sheriff's deputy that if she stopped another police officer for speeding, she would let them go and say "take it easy, see you later and have a good night."

"You know, I pull people over for driving 100 mph - you know what they say? 'I'm a narcotics officer in an unmarked vehicle.' 'Great, well slow it down, have a good night,' " Phinney explained. "As long as they show me a badge, I don't care."

That proclamation was captured by a Summerville police cruiser's video camera after Phinney led officers on a pursuit through town and tussled with a deputy, bloodying her lip in the process. On the tape, Phinney can be heard cursing the deputy and warning that he would "have a much bigger problem" when her husband, Dorchester County Sheriff's Lt. Tony Phinney, arrived on the scene.

"I'm Lt. Phinney's wife," she shouts on the tape. "He's gonna love it when you get sued for a (expletive) fat lip."
===
 
Tip: You don't DEMAND or ASK for an "officer courtesy". It's GIVEN to you.

If you deserve it.
 
Professional courtesy starts with making a reasonable effort NOT to cause someone to stop you in the first place.

It continues with being courteous yourself when stopped.

This woman just made herself look like an ***.
 
I don't know how it is in America but over here emergency vehicles speeding to an incident are technically breaking the law because no one can be seen to be above the law, even the Royal Family have had tickets for speeding but a free pass shouldn't be expected and I bet in most cases when it's not, it's given. More often here though the speed guns automatically process speeding tickets to be sent out so no one can avoid getting one other than by not speeding.
 
I don't know how it is in America but over here emergency vehicles speeding to an incident are technically breaking the law because no one can be seen to be above the law, even the Royal Family have had tickets for speeding but a free pass shouldn't be expected and I bet in most cases when it's not, it's given. More often here though the speed guns automatically process speeding tickets to be sent out so no one can avoid getting one other than by not speeding.

Most states have an exemption in their traffic laws allowing police to operate with disregard to some traffic laws. There are limitations however, it has to be in the course of duty...and it does not exempt officers from operating with gross negligence or recklessness.
 
She may very well have been granted a free pass, if not for the need for the persuit. Perhaps next time she will pull over immediately upon being requested to :).
The scuffle with the officer didnt help either...
 
She was WAY out of line......and continued to be so even after stopped. She should have been given a breathalyzer, as I suspect she was intoxicated, as listening to her tirade, it was typical of an alcohol fueled tirade.
 
"Professional courtesy" is one thing; this person seems to think her badge is a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card.

While many would almost expect a small infraction to be overlooked, I think a lot of the public would be surprised if extreme speeding/flight from an officer/assault on an officer/DWI and communicating threats were being let go.

Police in the city of Auburn are being asked questions after it was revealed the chief told them to write at least one ticket every day.... which changes the image of police from protectors to parasites. Now, add in immunity for dangerous illegal acts and I'd say they've done a great job of smearing the reputations and image of a lot of brave and good folks in uniform.
 
I don't know how it is in America but over here emergency vehicles speeding to an incident are technically breaking the law because no one can be seen to be above the law, even the Royal Family have had tickets for speeding but a free pass shouldn't be expected and I bet in most cases when it's not, it's given. More often here though the speed guns automatically process speeding tickets to be sent out so no one can avoid getting one other than by not speeding.

Each state's particular laws governing the operation of emergency vehicles are different, but they typically allow certain actions which would ordinarily be violations under emergency conditions and with due regard for safety, and they are pretty similar. For example, 46.2-920 in Virginia allows an emergency vehicle, operating appropriate lights and siren, to do seven specific things: disregard speed limits, pass on the right (siren not required), disregard stop signs and signals, disregard regulations on turning, park or stand anywhere, pass at an intersection, and cross the double yellow to pass. NONE of these remove the responsibility to operate with due regard for safety -- and officers have been successfully sued for being reckless. And prosecuted, too.

"Professional courtesy" is one thing; this person seems to think her badge is a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card.

While many would almost expect a small infraction to be overlooked, I think a lot of the public would be surprised if extreme speeding/flight from an officer/assault on an officer/DWI and communicating threats were being let go.

Police in the city of Auburn are being asked questions after it was revealed the chief told them to write at least one ticket every day.... which changes the image of police from protectors to parasites. Now, add in immunity for dangerous illegal acts and I'd say they've done a great job of smearing the reputations and image of a lot of brave and good folks in uniform.

I don't have a problem with a standard like one ticket a day, so long as there's enough leeway for an officer busy on something else to be OK, too. An officer often works most of their day with little or no direct supervision. Performance standards like that are simply a tool to know what they're doing with their time -- so that they don't spend the whole day in some donut shop. One ticket per day per officer in even a very large department isn't a scratch on the surface of the costs, and often can be accomplished by simply working a traffic crash. Especially if the tickets something like a Virginia seat belt law ticket, whose fines go to the literary fund. Now, a quota like 30 tickets a day, with no leeway for other duties or activities... that's a problem. At that point, it's pretty clearly about money. At a minimum, it looks bad.
 
When did "to serve and protect" get warped into "to snoop and collect" ?

The story appeared in the January 13, 2010 issue of the Syracuse Post Standard. The writer noted the ticket quota imposed by the Auburn police chief appears to violate NY State labor law. The union has threatened a grievance. Two professors were quoted as questioning the basic ethics behind the order.

One can read the story on the paper's website. I abhor this, and the looming threat of red light cameras. Sorry, but police are there to protect us, not mooch off us. Ticket quotas, like the one here, pervert LEOs into mere revenue agents.
 
When did "to serve and protect" get warped into "to snoop and collect" ?

The story appeared in the January 13, 2010 issue of the Syracuse Post Standard. The writer noted the ticket quota imposed by the Auburn police chief appears to violate NY State labor law. The union has threatened a grievance. Two professors were quoted as questioning the basic ethics behind the order.

One can read the story on the paper's website. I abhor this, and the looming threat of red light cameras. Sorry, but police are there to protect us, not mooch off us. Ticket quotas, like the one here, pervert LEOs into mere revenue agents.
Note that some of this depends on the jurisdiction; a beat cop in DC or NYC, for example, has plenty to do and to show that he's working without writing tickets, for example. But where I work? If a patrol officer can't find 1 reason to stop a car and write a ticket in a day... they're actively hiding. And, again, I expect a supervisor to know that the guy wasn't hiding, but was dispatching all day or handling a series of school crossings or guarding a major crime scene or whatever, so he didn't write anyone. 'Cause my departments patrol section just doesn't answer that many calls... (Average calls for service per day since January 1, including all t-stops and other generated calls would be around 30 right now. Like I said, those numbers include traffic stops and other self-initiated activity, too.

Let me give a typical patrol day in my jurisdiction: Patrol units work a 12 hour day. Roll call is about 1/2 an hour, and general "getting out the door" stuff can take another half hour after roll call. And roll call may be the last time the supervisor sees the officer until the next shift! Day shift you can figure a wreck or two (often resulting in a ticket), some alarm calls, and some other general calls. And that's if you're assigned a beat rather than floating to cover when the area unit is on a call or needs back-up. Figure that a busy day in my jurisdiction is about a half dozen calls for service... and a floating unit may not have any! In patrol, I used to average two to three reports a day -- and I felt like a slacker if I had none. (Some people currently don't have quite the same mindset... They try to avoid paper and calls as much as they can.) Performance goals, used properly, and not as a rigid quota system, are one tool for a supervisor to know what the officers are doing during the day. And traffic enforcement is an important thing in my area; we have tons of traffic and plenty of unsafe activity. It's not really any different than a law firm demanding billable hours or a company looking for a certain number of contracts.

Quotas are bad; I agree with that. A strict "must produce" without assessing other factors like criminal arrests, special assignments, working cases, and so on, is different than a performance goal. When the numbers are about bringing in revenue rather than promoting safety and monitoring worker activity -- that's bad. Public police aren't (or shouldn't be) a revenue producing stream. In Virginia, police budgets can't receive directly from ticket revenue -- and individual cops are prohibited from receiving any extra compensation for writing tickets or from tickets. In my jurisdiction, I think that ticket revenue amounted to about 10% of the total budget revenue -- and was significantly less than the PD's budget.

One more thing... A good supervisor should know roughly what his people are up to. He should know who the traffic hounds are and who is the guy who's going to rattle every doorknob in a shopping center on midnights, as well as who's going to go out and find dope or whatever criminal activity. There should be room for all of them -- and the supervisor should be able to explain what his people are doing if he's asked by the brass.
 
When did "to serve and protect" get warped into "to snoop and collect" ?

When the city politicians pervert the department in to such a function.

Odd that you didn't mention that the directive came from the City Manager and not the Chief of Police? Was that why you quoted the article without linking to it?

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/01/auburn_police_chiefs_wants_off.html

Giannotta told the dozen or so captains, lieutenants and sergeants at the meeting that City Manager Mark Palesh had told him he expects the department to start making $10,000 a month from vehicle and traffic fines, according to officers who were there. The department averaged about $7,500 monthly last year.

It may be fashionable to put the hate on the cops, but I think what is happening in Auburn is because of City Manager Mark Palesh.
 
When the city politicians pervert the department in to such a function.

Odd that you didn't mention that the directive came from the City Manager and not the Chief of Police? Was that why you quoted the article without linking to it?

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/01/auburn_police_chiefs_wants_off.html



It may be fashionable to put the hate on the cops, but I think what is happening in Auburn is because of City Manager Mark Palesh.

Please give me credit for some small level of intellect. Nobody who is trying to mislead the membership in general gives a precise citation to an article which is readily viewable.

I didn't link to it because I don't know how to. My computer skills allow me to get here and single finger type, nothing much more.

I don't do 'fashionable', anywheres. Even the most cursory review here will show I support the police viewpoint the large majority of times.

To get our facts exactly correct..... all are invited to read the article and see who set the revenue goal and who set quota and who threatened to punish the cops over it and how.
 
Please give me credit for some small level of intellect. Nobody who is trying to mislead the membership in general gives a precise citation to an article which is readily viewable.

I didn't link to it because I don't know how to. My computer skills allow me to get here and single finger type, nothing much more.

I don't do 'fashionable', anywheres. Even the most cursory review here will show I support the police viewpoint the large majority of times.

To get our facts exactly correct..... all are invited to read the article and see who set the revenue goal and who set quota and who threatened to punish the cops over it and how.

I am sorry :asian: I do respect you and your intellect. My apologies for reading something that wasn't there to begin with.
 
I accept, only with the deepest humility.

You are a far more valuable contributor here than I could ever be.

How could one of your superb professional skills be expected to imagine how limited mine are? I bet it did seem incredible........

Thanks!
 
If you are a cop and you did nothing else all day you better damn well at least have a ticket to show for your daily paycheck.
 
If you are a cop and you did nothing else all day you better damn well at least have a ticket to show for your daily paycheck.

But when there are revenue goals stated for the department, wouldn't that indicate that the focus is more on revenue generation than a performance metric?
 
But when there are revenue goals stated for the department, wouldn't that indicate that the focus is more on revenue generation than a performance metric?

Absolutely. THATS wrong. I'm just sayin. ;)

I have had to say the same thing to a few officers at performance reviews ("do something"). You can't just let cops "hide n' slide" for a whole shift. If they are not making criminal arrests then at least write a few tickets. People violate traffic law ALL the time and that car stop may lead to an arrest in itself. Many criminals and wanted people drive cars too.
 
SC cop fights with deputies after getting ticketed
Christine Phinney fought with officers after being pulled over for speeding


SUMMERVILLE, S.C. — Angered and bloody after being chased for speeding on Christmas Eve, an off-duty North Charleston police officer questioned why her pursuers hadn't simply given a fellow officer a free pass.

Officer Christine Phinney told a Dorchester County sheriff's deputy that if she stopped another police officer for speeding, she would let them go and say "take it easy, see you later and have a good night."

"You know, I pull people over for driving 100 mph - you know what they say? 'I'm a narcotics officer in an unmarked vehicle.' 'Great, well slow it down, have a good night,' " Phinney explained. "As long as they show me a badge, I don't care."

That proclamation was captured by a Summerville police cruiser's video camera after Phinney led officers on a pursuit through town and tussled with a deputy, bloodying her lip in the process. On the tape, Phinney can be heard cursing the deputy and warning that he would "have a much bigger problem" when her husband, Dorchester County Sheriff's Lt. Tony Phinney, arrived on the scene.

"I'm Lt. Phinney's wife," she shouts on the tape. "He's gonna love it when you get sued for a (expletive) fat lip."
===

This, IMHO, is a classic example of someone who should NOT be a LEO. Why? Because her attitude pretty much sucks. She has this, "My **** doesnt stink, I'm a cop, so I can do what I want, when I want" attitude. Lets see...driving like an *******, leading her fellow officers on a high speed chase, fighting and making threats that her big, bad hubby wont be happy. I'm sure he's someone that has a 'wonderful' attitude as well.

Now, before anyone mistakes what I'm saying, let me say this....I grew up in a LEO household, I work around them with my current job, have many good friends who're LEOs, so yes, I do have alot of respect for them, and fully understand the stuff they have to deal with. What I dont like is the high and mighty attitude.

As for her fat lip....well Officer Hothead...maybe, just maybe, if you weren't acting like an ***, you'd have less headaches. Was it really necessary to fight? Maybe if you didnt your lip wouldn't be as big as your head.
 
MJS -- I already said she made an *** out of herself.

Rule 1 of Professional Courtesy is try not to give someone a reason to stop you. I wouldn't have thought that it was necessary -- but the corollary is that when you do get stopped -- STOP, don't cause a pursuit.

Rule 2 is be courteous when you are stopped. If you have to eat a cite... take it like a grown up. When I'm stopped -- I always ID myself first, usually paired with an apology, along the lines of "Sorry; I'm a cop with ... PD. My gun is..." The corollary I didn't realize was needed is don't fight with the cops who stopped you.

We had a cop in my area, and whom I know, recently pull something incredibly boneheaded which led to headlines, his arrest, and his resignation. He at least had the wisdom to realize he'd screwed the pooch majorly, and turn himself in and quit. He's taking his lumps, in other words, and not trying to blame anyone else. That's a worst case scenario -- but at least he's handled it with a bit of class.
 
Back
Top