Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, seisan kata is acknowledged to be the oldest of the Okinawan kata, dating back to about 1800, and the Chinese versions are more complex. When Jesse says he found the guy who knows the original version it should be taken with a grain of salt since no one really knows what that looked like - could be close, though.I am not a Karate guy, but I found this interesting.
Now I am not sure of how accurate this is, but it is interesting. The Chinese style they are talking about is XiÄng DiĆ n QuĆ”n (é¦åŗę³) Incense Shop Boxing
I suspect the true origins of a kata like this are unknown, and even if incense shop boxing wasnāt established until the mid 19th century, it is possible that form existed prior. A newly established system does not spring forth fully formed from a vacuum. It develops from methods that came before, and that form could be from an older method that was carried into the newly established incense shop boxing.Question about this. I was doing s little research and Karate origin is said to be from 15th to 17th century. Yet XiÄng DiĆ n QuĆ”n (é¦åŗę³) Incense Shop Boxing origin is allegedly after the burning of the southern Shaolin Temple by the Qing in the mid 19th century. Additionally, the existence of the southern Shaolin temple is in question. However the Northern temple was burned in the late 1920s.
How can this be the origin of the oldest kata?
The Shaolin monks backed and fought for the Ming Dynasty. During these war years the monks developed their reputation for military pole arms weapons. After the Qing defeated them in the late 1600's they burned down the North Shaolin temple a few times, sending many monks fleeing to the south.after the burning of the southern Shaolin Temple by the Qing in the mid 19th century. Additionally, the existence of the southern Shaolin temple is in question. However the Northern temple was burned in the late 1920s.
As for the burning of the northern temple, I think that happened a couple of times? The first time being several hundred years ago and the last time I guess in the 1920s
Yes. It's thought there was no "Southern Shaolin" temple. Just as early karate schools here advertised "Judo and Kung Fu" as those were better known to many, Southern Chinese temples/monks/martial artists appropriated the "Shaolin" moniker for marketing and glorifying their reputation.the existence of the southern Shaolin temple is in question.
Much structure/organization/standardization is part of the Japanese culture, but not so much in "outback" Okinawa. While there was an attempt to unify Okinawan karate not much came from it, the various styles enjoying their independence while retaining friendly relations with each other to this day. They conformed to Japanese TMA as little as possible, and then only to be culturally accepted.Those schools that remained closer to the Okinawan traditions still maintain similarity to the earlier karate of the 1800s. I think those organizations are a lot smaller than the big Japanese organizations like the JKA.
Currently the 1647 date for the burning is considered legend. The 1928 burning is considered historic fact. Also during the cultural revolution, which started in 1966, what was left, was pretty much destroyed by the Red Guard, and any remaining monks were scatteredThe Shaolin monks backed and fought for the Ming Dynasty. During these war years the monks developed their reputation for military pole arms weapons. After the Qing defeated them in the late 1600's they burned down the North Shaolin temple a few times, sending many monks fleeing to the south.
Legend, yes. Both Wang Zhongyue and Zhang Sanfeng.Intriguing (far out possible)
āConnection to Karate
Some Karate scholars theorize about the legendary Chinese master known in Okinawa as Kushanku, being in fact Wang Zongyue [4]ā
Wang Zongyue Explained
Ok, I donāt believe thatā¦ā¦but, Kushanku/Kanku kata hold some fascinating similarities with [parts] of the Chen family Taijiquan forms, and the Chen family patriarch learned Taiji boxing from Wang Zhongyue, however it wasnāt called Taijiquan then but just -13 postures, a simple name, just like the name of the āoldestā karate kata - Seisan meaning 13.
As legend tell Wang Zhongyue learned from Zhang Sanfeng, and one line of the legend has Zhang Sanfeng hailing from Fujian province, the province from where the Okinawans got their karate .
There is another old kata within the Okinawan karate curriculum, itās called Wanshu, said to being named after the Chinese person that introduced it to Okinawa, his name was -Wang (Wan), the āshuā part in wanshu could then be short for Zhongyue ?
So three old Okinawan karate kata - Kushanku, Seisan and Wanshu , surfacewize show no similarities with each other but each have some surfacewize similarities with taijiquan
Hey don't worry, none of us here have ever said that.It just struck me, after posting, that I may not actually be the oldest kata.
Yeah it is really fascinating... I'm currently learning Seisan (our version again being slightly different to standard Goju), but I can see the similarities for sure.To get back on track. I must admit the incense shop form does have striking similarities to the karate Kata. So much so that I do not doubt the connection. It just struck me, after posting, that I may not actually be the oldest kata. But then it might be. Could also be there were older katas that are no longer in existence.
Either way, I find it rather interesting
I think about that from time to time myself...... Chen Wangting....... 14th generation, Chen Changxing > Yang Luchan > Yang Jianhou > Yang Chengfu > Tung Ying Chieh > my teacher > me. Although the form has change a bit from Chen Wangting's time to me....and other styles I've trained as well... Heck, when I'm in China, my brain just starts thinking on the thousands of years of history around me.Yeah it is really fascinating... I'm currently learning Seisan (our version again being slightly different to standard Goju), but I can see the similarities for sure.
One thing that really has come to mind of late... it's really something special practicing a form, knowing that this form (or the essence of it) has been practiced for a very long time, and I'm stepping into and being a part of that. Something about embodying it and fully taking it on, gives it a different dimension and experience. Connecting you with not just the past, but something that's still living. I guess that can be true of any martial arts we practice.
Like there's a stream of water, and I'm willingly stepping into it and experiencing something that's been flowing for a long time. Different than just viewing it on the side..
Nice to see someone young able to appreciate the passage of time and that which it carries from past to present. The "ryu" in goju-ryu, wado-ryu and all the others does not merely mean "style." It infers the passage of a style's nature over time, from generation to generation. "...flowing for a long time" is an apt description. Being able to trace an unbroken lineage starting from 300 years ago and ending up with YOU is kind of cool.Yeah it is really fascinating... I'm currently learning Seisan (our version again being slightly different to standard Goju), but I can see the similarities for sure.
One thing that really has come to mind of late... it's really something special practicing a form, knowing that this form (or the essence of it) has been practiced for a very long time, and I'm stepping into and being a part of that. Something about embodying it and fully taking it on, gives it a different dimension and experience. Connecting you with not just the past, but something that's still living. I guess that can be true of any martial arts we practice.
Like there's a stream of water, and I'm willingly stepping into it and experiencing something that's been flowing for a long time. Different than just viewing it on the side..
my guy, seisan as a concept and this exact iteration of seisan are not the same thing. Seisan is a generic name for a type of form that typically has "13" stepsQuestion about this. I was doing s little research and Karate origin is said to be from 15th to 17th century. Yet XiÄng DiĆ n QuĆ”n (é¦åŗę³) Incense Shop Boxing origin is allegedly after the burning of the southern Shaolin Temple by the Qing in the mid 19th century. Additionally, the existence of the southern Shaolin temple is in question. However the Northern temple was burned in the late 1920s.
How can this be the origin of the oldest kata?
13 series of moves is probably more accurate, though this number has evolved to vary from style-to-style.my guy, seisan as a concept and this exact iteration of seisan are not the same thing. Seisan is a generic name for a type of form that typically has "13" steps
I dont believe they truly have a common ancestry. They just evoke a common buddhist concept13 series of moves is probably more accurate, though this number has evolved to vary from style-to-style.
It's known that seisan kata was first publicly demonstrated by Arigaki Seisho in 1867, who presumably learned it from his main teacher, Ryuruko (Wei Xixian). Prior to this, Matsumura Soken (40 years older than Arigaki) leaned this kata and later taught it to Kyan who taught Isshinryu founder Shimabuku. This puts a date of at least late 1700's on the establishment of seisan kata, but could be earlier.
This fact is bolstered by Matsumura and Ryuruko lineages having little to no connection. So, the common ancestor of the kata must have been prior to these two men learning it. What is very interesting is that the Arigaki version and Kyan version are remarkedly similar. This further supports there being a standardized Chinese seisan kata possibly by the mid or early 1700's.
The West's most renown karate historian, Patrick McCarthy, notes that the kata has elements of both Northern and Southern Chinese styles. Considering the time it would take for these elements to coalesce into a single form may place the origin of seisan kata as early as late 1600's, IMO.
Much of this is conjecture based on current info but does suggest a very possible timeline.
If you take the time to go on YouTube and look at both Arigaki seisan kata and Shorinryu seisan, the similarity is unmistakable!! Although some moves may be expressed a bit differently. it is clear they are basically the same kata and MUST have had the same ancestor.I dont believe they truly have a common ancestry.
I think Matsumura Shorin Ryu is a strong style but I do not believe it's narrativesIf you take the time to go on YouTube and look at both Arigaki seisan kata and Shorinryu seisan, the similarity is unmistakable!! Although some moves may be expressed a bit differently. it is clear they are basically the same kata and MUST have had the same ancestor.
What do you think about the relationship between Sanchin and Seisan?If you take the time to go on YouTube and look at both Arigaki seisan kata and Shorinryu seisan, the similarity is unmistakable!! Although some moves may be expressed a bit differently. it is clear they are basically the same kata and MUST have had the same ancestor.
None. They evolved on different paths. The Goju version of seisan has adopted some of the principles of sanchin and is done in a way that reflects the style's nature but that is true of all styles - kata is done in accordance with their styles' principles of power, movement, and so on.What do you think about the relationship between Sanchin and Seisan?