I'll take your word on that
but it would not be my first choice Im sure
but it would not be my first choice Im sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree
Simple flying jumping sidekick, like your opponet is just going to stand there while you come running at him and jump with that foot going right at him, please the movies are great but this kick is worthless and yet it get tought by everyone except me but my students learn it from vido games and movies.
Take it off a Russian 2 on 1, follow into a leg lock. Not the highest percentage move, but it can definitely work.
Please explain this kick
the "Z" kickWhich one? (to whom are you replying?)
IMO
Just about any aerial kick is useless (and I have been taught a few) unless your target is standing there not moving and has absolutely no intention of doing so.
the "Z" kick
I don't think that's quite true.
We usually think of kicks as isolated entities. So if you and I are facing each other in a combat situation, then something like a jump spin outside crescent or something as an initial move is probably not a high-probability of success. I think such individual techniques are going ot have a higher probability though if thought of as part of a scenario where the opponent has gotten into a situation where they are not ready for such an attack. That's a bit too abstract to think of anything definite...
Just as a silly example, I kick my opponent in the knee, he flinches and drops his head and shoulders a bit in reaction to the pain. Now, I have his attention low and I've dropped his shoulders and head. For a split instant, that jumping outside crescent becomes a higher probability attack. That's maybe a goofy example, but I'm just thinking that there are a lot of techniques that are not very useful starting from an even footing that may become more applicable as the dynamics of the encounter change positions, attentions, and reactions
Note: I don't tend to think of any technique as "will work" or "won't work", I tend to try to think of a) probability and b) risk vs reward. I want techniques with high probability and high reward/low risk, but sometimes circumstances dictate moving along that continuum
But in the case that you posted; Kick him in the knee first then it is likely he is not going to be moving much after that so a jump kick could work rather well. I however would likely just use a front snap kick and keep the other foot on the ground or a knoee strike depending on how low his head actually was.
Thats actually true for a lot of kicks. Lotsa kicks that have minimal sparring usage, no real-world usage, but are good to work on for strength, balance, timing, etc...
Back to the point, the Z-Kick or inverted front kick comes to mind first
OK, here is a quick demo of a z-kick
On top of that...The big problem with the horseback theory.... horse are tall, you'd have to be clearing 6 feet and kicking at 8 feet. Those Okinawans / Koreans aren't the tallest people on the planet either. I just can't see someone kicking a person off a horse.
Nor can I see a disarmed public composed of farmers and fishermans fighting off heavily armed professional warriors using improvised weapons, the kicking off a horse seems to have come out of that story line.