Matt Damon tries to defend the american education system, and raising taxes on the rich. He doesn't do either one well. Michelle Malkin explains things to him in her column:
Sorry, Matt, but if I were your math teacher back at Cambridge Rindge and Latin, Id have to give you an F. Wrong on theory and fact. First the data starting with Matts myth that teachers work for a shi . . .  er, less-than-adequate salary. According to the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, the average Boston teacher earned around $80,000 last year. That was the average. And that doesnt include the generous health care or pension benefits, which would equal $100,000 in the private sector. All for just 180 days of work. Nationally, the average teacher salary is significantly lower $53,000. But a teacher still earns more by herself (and about 75 percent of K-12 teachers are women) than the household income of the average American family. Once again, with summers and holidays off. That fact is important because when you break down what teachers earn per hour, the average teacher is better paid ($30.52) than the average computer programmer ($21.27) or architect ($27.71). So Damon is wrong on the numbers. And his theory is even worse. Modern economic theory is based on the premise of incentives. Damons position that incentives dont affect behavior puts him in the fiscal Flat Earth Society. Hes the equivalent of an economic creationist.