- Last login streak
- 113 day(s)
- Max login streak
- 113 day(s)
Property in Japan, especially in Tokyo is very expensive. Thus the increasing popularity in jiko bukken (事故物件), which literally means an ’incident property ‘or ‘stigmatised property’ is interesting. The legal term is shinriteki kashi(心理的瑕疵), usually translated as ‘psychological defect’ and indicates a property where a death occurred.
Shinriteki kashi refers to circumstances that could materially influence a buyer's or tenant's decision, most commonly deaths, suicides or other disturbing incidents associated with a property. Properties with such histories are often referred to as jiko bukken (事故物件, "incident properties"). This category can also include buildings associated with cult activity or other events that give a property a negative reputation, although the legal assessment depends on the specific facts of each case. By contrast, kankyō-teki kashi bukken (環境的瑕疵物件) are properties affected by undesirable external conditions. Examples include proximity to graveyards, organised-crime activity in the area, persistent noise problems, offensive odours, or other environmental factors that may reduce the property's desirability. While some estate agents loosely group these properties under the broader label of jiko bukken, they are generally treated as a separate category in practice.
Property owners and sellers in Japan are required to disclose information that could materially affect a buyer's or tenant's decision to rent/buy. According to guidelines issued by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), incidents involving non-natural deaths or cases requiring ‘special cleaning’ are generally treated as disclosure items in rental transactions for roughly three years. However, this is a practical guideline rather than a strict legal rule and applies primarily to rentals. Property sales are treated differently. There is no automatic three-year cut-off, and sellers may still be required to disclose past incidents if they could reasonably influence a buyer's decision. Whether disclosure is necessary ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of each case.
If the discount were attractive enough, would you buy a stigmatised property or would a jiko bukken be a deal breaker for you?
Shinriteki kashi refers to circumstances that could materially influence a buyer's or tenant's decision, most commonly deaths, suicides or other disturbing incidents associated with a property. Properties with such histories are often referred to as jiko bukken (事故物件, "incident properties"). This category can also include buildings associated with cult activity or other events that give a property a negative reputation, although the legal assessment depends on the specific facts of each case. By contrast, kankyō-teki kashi bukken (環境的瑕疵物件) are properties affected by undesirable external conditions. Examples include proximity to graveyards, organised-crime activity in the area, persistent noise problems, offensive odours, or other environmental factors that may reduce the property's desirability. While some estate agents loosely group these properties under the broader label of jiko bukken, they are generally treated as a separate category in practice.
Property owners and sellers in Japan are required to disclose information that could materially affect a buyer's or tenant's decision to rent/buy. According to guidelines issued by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), incidents involving non-natural deaths or cases requiring ‘special cleaning’ are generally treated as disclosure items in rental transactions for roughly three years. However, this is a practical guideline rather than a strict legal rule and applies primarily to rentals. Property sales are treated differently. There is no automatic three-year cut-off, and sellers may still be required to disclose past incidents if they could reasonably influence a buyer's decision. Whether disclosure is necessary ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of each case.
If the discount were attractive enough, would you buy a stigmatised property or would a jiko bukken be a deal breaker for you?
