lklawson
Grandmaster
OK, I admit this is just a discussion starter, but here goes.
It's pretty common for folks to recommend to newbies asking questions about weapons that they study Bo/Jo/Hanbo because "sticks are laying around everywhere in our culture" and specifically cite "brooms."
Now, we'll skip for now reasons why "long stick" is recommended above "gun" or "knife" by these nice folks. However, it does bring up the question of exactly how applicable Bo/Jo techniques actually are for a broom.
It is my personal experience that Bo and long-staff (like Quarterstaff or any of the other cultural incarnations of a 6' or longer equal ended staff) just don't fit for a broom. You simply can not move a broom the same way. First, many brooms are simply too short. Even broad based "push brooms" tend to be too short. Further, that "broom" thingy on the end kinda gets in the way of a lot of important movements. And it is certainly no good as a dual ended bludgeoning instrument. Again, the bristle end gets in the way and cushions too much. Throws off the balance too and has a lot of air "drag" as you try to swing it around.
And that's without getting into the fact that broom handles are often of questionable quality with unfortunate grain "run-out." When picking a piece of wood for a project you can inspect it for sturdiness and grain run-out before hand. With a broom that you pick up from just where-ever, you don't have that luxury, to say nothing of brooms with hollow aluminum or (God help us!) hollow PLASTIC handles.
It is my personal (experimental) experience that thrusting techniques actually are best suited for the broom with occasional short chopping motions with the front from a two handed, wide spaced, rear-ended grip. When it gets right down to it, best practice for a broom looks a whole lot like modern short-rifled bayonet (minus the buttstroke).
Anyway, that's it for the discussion starter post.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
It's pretty common for folks to recommend to newbies asking questions about weapons that they study Bo/Jo/Hanbo because "sticks are laying around everywhere in our culture" and specifically cite "brooms."
Now, we'll skip for now reasons why "long stick" is recommended above "gun" or "knife" by these nice folks. However, it does bring up the question of exactly how applicable Bo/Jo techniques actually are for a broom.
It is my personal experience that Bo and long-staff (like Quarterstaff or any of the other cultural incarnations of a 6' or longer equal ended staff) just don't fit for a broom. You simply can not move a broom the same way. First, many brooms are simply too short. Even broad based "push brooms" tend to be too short. Further, that "broom" thingy on the end kinda gets in the way of a lot of important movements. And it is certainly no good as a dual ended bludgeoning instrument. Again, the bristle end gets in the way and cushions too much. Throws off the balance too and has a lot of air "drag" as you try to swing it around.
And that's without getting into the fact that broom handles are often of questionable quality with unfortunate grain "run-out." When picking a piece of wood for a project you can inspect it for sturdiness and grain run-out before hand. With a broom that you pick up from just where-ever, you don't have that luxury, to say nothing of brooms with hollow aluminum or (God help us!) hollow PLASTIC handles.
It is my personal (experimental) experience that thrusting techniques actually are best suited for the broom with occasional short chopping motions with the front from a two handed, wide spaced, rear-ended grip. When it gets right down to it, best practice for a broom looks a whole lot like modern short-rifled bayonet (minus the buttstroke).
Anyway, that's it for the discussion starter post.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk