Hmm... sounds like somebody oughta fess up... cause like many that are outside looking in on it, I just repeated what I'd heard.
yeah, I know this is a common story. It just doesn't ring true to me. Seems to me that if Mr. Chow had learned a kungfu system like Hung Gar that had become part of his family tradition, it would have survived in some manner into what we do today in kenpo. But today's kenpo that I've seen, from the later Parker lineages to the earlier Tracy lineage that i study, looks NOTHING like hung gar. Granted, in Tracys we have adopted a version of Fu-Hok, but nobody pretends that that came from Chow's family. It was clearly and openly brought in from another source, and it's been thoroughly "kenpo-ized" and actually looks fairly different from a traditional hung gar version. It's clearly the same form, but the "quality" of the movement is different.
The Tracy brothers were early students of Mr. Parker, studying with him from about 1957 into the 1960s or something. They split off from Mr. Parker when Mr. Parker began making changes to the art that the Tracys did not agree with. The split was a gradual process, I'm not sure when it became complete. So what the Tracys kept, was closer to what Mr. Parker had learned from Mr. Chow. So if there was a true hung gar lineage thru Mr. Chow, it could be expected to be seen in Tracy kenpo. But it just isn't there.
I've spoken with another guy who studies kenpo under a lineage direct to Mr. Chow but not thru Ed Parker. He also studies taiji with my sifu. He has commented that he believes Mr. Chow did learn something from his father, but perhaps he dumped it in favor of what he learned later because he didn't feel it worked well. He was going to get me some article that explained it all, but I haven't seen it yet. So it's still a bit unclear to me and I remain skeptical about the whole thing.
Wasn't that Jimmy Woo (not Jimmy H from KFSS note) he spent some time with in LA a Hung Ga guy? I'd read that somewhere as well.
Don't tell me it's getting to where you can't trust what you read on the net?!?!?!
Mr. Parker did spend time with Jimmy Woo. I'm not completely sure what Mr. Woo's background is. I think he trained under several teachers in different methods, and perhaps Hung Gar was one of them. I don't know exactly how long Mr. Parker's relationship with Mr. Woo lasted, but I don't think it was much more than a couple years, if that.
Whether or not Mr. Parker systematically studied hung gar with Mr. Woo is something that I simply don't know. I believe Mr. Parker did learn stuff from Mr. Woo. But if it wasn't a systematic study of a specific art, it could have been more of a hodge-podge. In that case I can't really justify saying that he "studied hung gar" with Mr. Woo.
honestly, I'm not the expert on this topic. I'm commenting based on what I've heard and on what sort of makes sense to me. I'm making conclusions, or remaining skeptical about various claims, based on what does or does not make sense to me, given the stories i've heard.
I know there are a lot of people who disagree with what I've said here.