Originally posted by hardheadjarhead
But if we never train any scenarios, then we do nothing more than train...again...on a perfectly flat surface in an open area, with no furniture or other obstacles in our way and dressed in our doboks, gi's, or comfortable training attire.
Students who do this are in for a heck of a shock should they be attacked in a confined space or while dressed in something other than a gi.
Perhaps what I'm advocating isn't so much a scenario as "environmental training."
You mentioned training with the lights off as being an example of going too far. Police and military train for low light situations all of the time. Shouldn't we?
I've personally known two women who were attacked while in their cars...one my wife. Isn't that a worthwhile situation to address?
Regards,
Steve
I should probably clarify a bit more. In a nutshell, scenario training is fine, but it depends on your purpose for training. If we are talking long term martial arts training, not very nessicary. Other types of training (general self defense course, LEO, military) scanario training becomes much more nessicary.
So remember, I never said don't do scenarios, or never train under varied conditions. I just think that sometimes people who are supposed to be training in a martial arts class take it too far, and it is unessicary. Training in low light conditions is fine. Discussing and addressing the issue of being attacked in a confined space, like a car, is also fine. But if your supposed to be training in an actual martial art, such as Modern Arnis, or Kenpo, and yet scenario training overtakes your entire curriculim, or even a large amount of your curriculum, then I think you have a problem.
Now, as I said before, it does depend on what your training for. If its a general self defense course (not art specific) that runs maybe 4 consecutive weekends and your done, then sure, scenario training might be more prevalent. Reason: your training for self defense, and you are not training to be a better martial artist. Your not trying to improve your attributes or abilities as a fighter; you are simply using what you have RIGHT NOW to learn how to defend yourself. So, you learn a few simple stupid concepts, principles, and techniques, then you train scenarios.
LEO or Military are also not training to be better fighters or martial artists. They are trying to use whatever they have RIGHT NOW to do their job. So, they learn a different set of simple stupid principles then a civilian would, yet it is basically the same. Simple stupid concepts, techniques, then scenario training...done in a few weeks, moving on.
So, am I making sense here? LEO, Military, and civilian self defense do scenarios because they are not trying to improve their abilities as fighters, or martial artists. They are learning in a very short amount of time how to utilize what they have RIGHT NOW to defend themselves. So, they learn a few simple stupid concepts, then they drill scenarios so that these concepts can get integrated in their reactionary/response memories.
However, if you are learning a martial art to become a better fighter/martial artist, then the majority of your training should be spent learning your art. Why? because your trying to take your skill level to higher levels, and you have a few years to a lifetime to do it. Doing scenarios is fine under these circumstances, but getting carried away will only take away from your ability to learn your art.
Lengthy explaination, but am I making sense? :idunno: