Warning shot fired by security guard: Stupid, but legal

Bill Mattocks

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
15,674
Reaction score
4,544
Location
Michigan
In this case, at least. Man, this security guard was a dangerous clown. However, he got lucky - his charges were dismissed. However, there is much to learn here about what NOT to do.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/news/...-the-j-c-penney-guard-who-fired--1052328.html

A former J.C. Penney Co. store guard who fired a gun as a suspected shoplifter fled into the Valley View Mall parking lot was being stupid -- but not reckless, at least as state law defines it, a judge said Monday.
Dler Anwar Anwar, 34, was charged with recklessly handling a firearm after shooting into the air during a March 26 pursuit of a suspected shoplifter.
 

CoryKS

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
4,403
Reaction score
183
Location
Olathe, KS
1) It's permissible to use deadly force if a felony has been committed;
2) A theft of > $200 is considered a felony; therefore
3) It's permissible to shoot shoplifters

I'd be curious to know if Virginia actually considers shoplifting to be a shootable offense or if that's an unintended consequence of trying to impose higher penalties on theft of high-dollar items.
 
OP
Bill Mattocks

Bill Mattocks

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
15,674
Reaction score
4,544
Location
Michigan
1) It's permissible to use deadly force if a felony has been committed;
2) A theft of > $200 is considered a felony; therefore
3) It's permissible to shoot shoplifters

I'd be curious to know if Virginia actually considers shoplifting to be a shootable offense or if that's an unintended consequence of trying to impose higher penalties on theft of high-dollar items.

There were two other factors in play here. He did not fire at the suspect, he fired a 'warning shot' in the air instead. And he was not authorized by his employer to be carrying a firearm in the first place. He was apparently terminated for that action.

Many states allow for deadly force to be used to prevent the escape of a suspected felon when the person making the apprehension is a witness to the felony. The person need not be a police officer. So this is not that unusual or even unique to Virginia.
 

Andy Moynihan

Senior Master
MT Mentor
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
3,692
Reaction score
176
Location
People's Banana Republic of Massachusettstan, Disu
*FACEPALM* :rpo: :rpo: :rpo:


As a carry permit holder, firearms safety instructor and someone taking every course he can afford in order to become a better personal protection specialist, let me make this as clear as I can : WE DO NOT DO THIS ANYMORE.

This isn't the 1960's anymore and the laws have changed since then,
and you WILL be held to account for every round you let loose if anyone is injured or killed who did not earn such justification by a threat of deadly force.

In as simple math as I can break it down into:

*Intentionally firing a shot without knowing exactly where you intend it to go=NEGLIGENCE

*NEGLIGENCE + DEATH= MANSLAUGHTER.

Suppose his fired round had not terminated harmlessly? suppose on the way back down it hits some poor lady bringing her groceries in some miles distant?

Massad Ayoob cites just such a case that happened in the 80's in many of his LFI classes. Someone fired a "warning shot", hit that woman on the way down some ways distant. Round hit her square in her heart, within less than a minute by the coroner's estimation, she was dead.



Anybody want to speculate on what that guy's chances were in court?



Did I forget to mention WE DO NOT DO THIS ANYMORE.
 
Last edited:

CanuckMA

Master of Arts
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,726
Reaction score
57
Location
Toronto
Why does there seem to be this idea that rounds fired in the air simply vanish?

You let a round loose, you better know where it's going.
 

celtic_crippler

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
3,968
Reaction score
137
Location
Airstrip One
If you're going to expend a round, at least put it in he perp and not trust to fate that it will fall to the earth without causing injury to an innocent.

...but then, I don't have any problem with shop lifters being shot.
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
There were two other factors in play here. He did not fire at the suspect, he fired a 'warning shot' in the air instead. And he was not authorized by his employer to be carrying a firearm in the first place. He was apparently terminated for that action.

Many states allow for deadly force to be used to prevent the escape of a suspected felon when the person making the apprehension is a witness to the felony. The person need not be a police officer. So this is not that unusual or even unique to Virginia.

They killed him?
 

Latest Discussions

Top