Taekwondo, waste of time?

But all these years later, my wrestling has served me better than Taekwondo ever has.
When you get older, single leg balance and flexibility can be more important than anything else. At the age of 80, if you can still do this 6 kicks combo:

- roundhouse kick (or inside crescent kick),
- spin hook kick (or outside crescent kick),
- front toes kick,
- front heel kick,
- side kick,
- back kick,

your body will be in excellent shape.

IMO, for maintaining health, kicking can help you more than punching and throwing. You can get better health result from 200 kicks than from 1000 punches.
 
What is the actual Korean word used for this honorific we call "Master," and what is its literal translation? Shades of meaning often change when put into a different language. Does it really just mean "adept, skilled teacher, one who understands," or some other kind of thing?
I can only address the Chang Hon System. A Quick review of the 1965 and 1972 Texts did not reveal the Korean except for Degrees 1-3 = Assistant Instructor which we learned as Boo Sa Bum, 4-6 Instructor - Sa Bum, and 7-9 Master. With he last part of the Syllabus learned at 6th degree. Later texts designated Master as Sa Hyun 7 & 8 and 9- Grandmaster as Sa Seong. These do not translate directly and it would take me while to find that. Yes, you are correct. Agreeing on the meaning is important. Being adept and skilled at some discipline would fit this context although I would add "Knowledgeable"
 
Was this honorific used prior to the mass export of TKD to the West and if so, did the designated English meaning (as determined by the TKD establishment) change afterwards to help market the art here by implying their rank-and-file instructors were on a higher level than those of other styles?
An interesting question and first we would have to determine which mass export timeline. The first was in the early 1960's and at that time aside from the founder there were no 7th Degree Master Instructors so it was not an issue. That would not have occurred until the late 1960's / early 1970's so it was not much of an issue.
The second wave would have been post 1973-4 Creation of the KKW / WT, so that would be something for a KKW / WT person to address. I can't pin it down but IIRC that at some point KKW lowered the rank for application of the "Master" title.
 
So, the obvious question (As posited by Forrest Morgan in "Living the Martial Way") is How can you be a "Master" of a system where that system does not yet have you learn all of the system material when that title is applied?
The question is actually meaningless.

"Master" indicates a skill level. I know people who are certified as Master electricians and Master plumbers. They continue to attend training courses and learn new things.

There is ALWAYS something new to learn. If you want to take it a step further, you can say that a Master is a really, really good student.
 
The question is actually meaningless.

"Master" indicates a skill level. I know people who are certified as Master electricians and Master plumbers. They continue to attend training courses and learn new things.

There is ALWAYS something new to learn. If you want to take it a step further, you can say that a Master is a really, really good student.
Yet if you consider "Master" does not denote perfection or all knowing such Masters including those I know who have known the entire syllabus for decades still attend courses, Yet they are qualified to teach the entire syllabus.
 
Bring a knife (lethal weapon) to a fist fight can have legal consequences. That's why OC spray is often suggested as a non-lethal self-defense weapon as well.
I don't know anything about fighting but anyway I thought fighting martial arts for reals in the streets was silly because weapons. I personally like OC and have a practice water can also. I carry it in the same place and practice getting at it quick. I even got sprayed so that I'm not surprised when I catch it. But I heard that in many European countries even OC is illegal. So you really would have to learn martial arts to be better prepared to defend yourself. Also there are so many occasions when a person doesn't have a weapon or can't have a weapon. So I see the value of knowing how to fight and wrestle and stuff. But still I question if someone is so concerned with practicing a Martial Art solely to defend themself in the streets, why wouldn't they emphasize knife fighting practice?
 
Last edited:
I don't know anything about fighting but anyway I thought fighting martial arts for reals in the streets was silly because weapons.
Most confrontations do not involve weapons. And you overlook the need to defend yourself while you grab whatever weapon you're going to use.
I personally like OC and have a practice water can also. I carry it in the same place and practice getting at it quick. I even got sprayed so that I'm not surprised when I catch it. But I heard that in many European countries even OC is illegal. So you really would have to learn martial arts to be better prepared to defend yourself. Also there are so many occasions when a person doesn't have a weapon or can't have a weapon.
Not so. I have a couple canes. One is wood, with a slightly more open curve so it can be used as a hook. The other is a metal pipe with a sturdy ornamental wolf head handle. It makes a fine mace. Can you name one place where I wouldn't be able to carry either? Don't have a weapon? That is 100% on you. Can't have a weapon? Piffle. Yes, I can.
So I see the value of knowing how to fight and wrestle and stuff. But still I question if someone is so concerned with practicing a Martial Art solely to defend themself in the streets, why wouldn't they emphasize knife fighting practice?
I doubt self-defense is the sole reason for studying, at least not for very many.
 
Most confrontations do not involve weapons. And you overlook the need to defend yourself while you grab whatever weapon you're going to use.

Not so. I have a couple canes. One is wood, with a slightly more open curve so it can be used as a hook. The other is a metal pipe with a sturdy ornamental wolf head handle. It makes a fine mace. Can you name one place where I wouldn't be able to carry either? Don't have a weapon? That is 100% on you. Can't have a weapon? Piffle. Yes, I can.

I doubt self-defense is the sole reason for studying, at least not for very many.
Very good points, thank you
 
I don't know anything about fighting but anyway I thought fighting martial arts for reals in the streets was silly because weapons. I personally like OC and have a practice water can also. I carry it in the same place and practice getting at it quick. I even got sprayed so that I'm not surprised when I catch it. But I heard that in many European countries even OC is illegal. So you really would have to learn martial arts to be better prepared to defend yourself. Also there are so many occasions when a person doesn't have a weapon or can't have a weapon. So I see the value of knowing how to fight and wrestle and stuff. But still I question if someone is so concerned with practicing a Martial Art solely to defend themself in the streets, why wouldn't they emphasize knife fighting practice?
There are many martial arts that do focus on weapons. My main art does, and a lot of the focus is on either reaching your weapon, or ways to use improvised weapons.

If you understand how to use 'improvised' weapons, you can easily carry a weapon most places - the three easiest options are a knife (which in many jobs you can say is work-related), a cane, or an umbrella.

And a lot of this is based on positioning, and knowledge of general martial principles. I would be much more concerned fighting a boxer who has a knife, for instance, than someone who has trained a knife form but never tried it in practice. Because the boxer knows how to fight, and can use it as a supplement, rather than their sole needs of protection that they haven't trained.

Lastly, regarding something like OC or pepper spray, not focusing on illegality, you can practice getting it free, but what if the situation you're in doesn't allow for it? Ie: if they grab you before you realize you're in danger you're not going to be able to reach your spray, and use it. Or if they recognize what you're trying to do, they can step back and then just put their head down and rush at you, totally negating the spray. Having one option isn't all you need, and considering that you need to be 21 ft or more away to have a gun protect you from a knife attack, I'd assume any spray wouldn't be more helpful than that.
 
The question is actually meaningless.

"Master" indicates a skill level. I know people who are certified as Master electricians and Master plumbers. They continue to attend training courses and learn new things.

There is ALWAYS something new to learn. If you want to take it a step further, you can say that a Master is a really, really good student.
I have worked with a lot of 'Master' tradesmen in my work. Some of them were very good and really knew their stuff and even in a Union environment, didn't let title get in the way of getting a job done. Some were absolutely terrible at their job, but since they had put the time in as an apprentice and passed the test, (very relative) a state gave them a new title and, they got a huge bump in pay.
I imagine we have all seen the same in our vein of martial arts. The difference is real knowledge verses perceived knowledge and the natural decline of physical ability versus perceived real physical ability.

Master does indicate a skill level, but it is What you do with that knowledge that makes a Master a Master.

Everyone has their personal opinion which I think should account for a lot. I reached Master Dan rank in 1994. Especially back then, I never used the moniker. Why? Because I had reached it mainly on my physical ability and competition record. Yes, I knew the curriculum well, put in the required number of years, and had been teaching since '84. But I did not 'feel' like my idea of a Master. As time went on, I realized the moniker just does not fit me even though I have the rank. The only time I use it is when I am at an event where title is important/required or am introduced as such.

It is like rank, it is just a number.
 
I would be much more concerned fighting a boxer who has a knife, for instance, than someone who has trained a knife form but never tried it in practice. Because the boxer knows how to fight, and can use it as a supplement, rather than their sole needs of protection that they haven't trained.
That kind of blew my mind, but yeah that makes so much sense.
if they grab you before you realize you're in danger you're not going to be able to reach your spray, and use it. Or if they recognize what you're trying to do, they can step back and then just put their head down and rush at you, totally negating the spray. Having one option isn't all you need, and considering that you need to be 21 ft or more away to have a gun protect you from a knife attack, I'd assume any spray wouldn't be more helpful than that.
This gave me a lot to think about, thank you so much.
 
Can you name one place where I wouldn't be able to carry either?

Depending on the country and intent...

Airports, courts, even schools. You'll likely be asked what they are and why you're carrying them. Australia is quite strict for example and if the police officer sees you walking around with a shillelagh it'll raise eyebrows.

I think in Japan as well, this is true. You'll need paperwork about medical reasons for carrying it and if you don't, where you plan on going with said weapon.
 
Depending on the country and intent...
My intent is to keep my balance. I have neuropathies from chemo that make my feet numb. Sometimes I need a little help with balance.
Airports, courts, even schools. You'll likely be asked what they are and why you're carrying them. Australia is quite strict for example and if the police officer sees you walking around with a shillelagh it'll raise eyebrows.
What they are is obvious. They're canes. Assistive devices. Nobody cares. I have flown with them many times.
I think in Japan as well, this is true. You'll need paperwork about medical reasons for carrying it and if you don't, where you plan on going with said weapon.
Are you saying Japan is such a barbarous place that they'll stop me on the street and demand to see a note from my Dr? That's just silly.
 
Wow, it’s an art. Is ballet a waste of time. If you’ve simply hit a dead end, change to the FMA. It will take the rest of your life to master it.
 
I stopped training at 4th Dan (Kukkiwon), 5th Dan (Local school)
Wow, no disrespect but it took you that long to figure out you were wasting your time? When did you come to this conclusion? Was it early on in your training or right near the end when you quit? If you felt this way for a while then it is disingenuous to people you are teaching; I would think at that level of black belt, you surely had to do some instructing.
 
I agree that it's about culture and environment. But culture and environment are self selecting. Meaning if I wanted an activity to do with my 8 yo son, I could join TKD and in some schools we could train in the same class. Great benefit for families. However an individual looking for intense self defense or full contact would not be interested in joining. The end result speaks for itself. TkD schools are maybe 90 % kids. MMA is maybe 90% adults. And those that want to get really good are highly selective in which school they attend. An Olympic level athlete will not join the school down the street. The results for the average student are independent from curriculum or quality of instruction. I've said before that I truly belive that the quality of your students is dependent on the quality level of your top 2 or 3 students. If you can't attract high level athletes and only attract the average family, you will have a thriving buisness but people that want more, like the OP will find that school a waste of time.
I have been going through some of my older post in the hopes to regenerate some conversation.

We run a lot of classes but our 'primary' classes are the three evening classes. The first is kids only, the second is mixed age, and the third is adults only. People can mix and match as desired for up to 3-hours of training (each class is 1-1/2 hours).

How can a person's results be independent of the curriculum or instructor? Junk in, junk out is a Very true statement.

Absolutely, people feed off of other people. This is especially true when we are talking about excellence or exceptional people. Some people are simply prodigies and need little to not incentive. Others have the potential but have to be motivated to squeeze it out. Having expectation present in class really sets a tone, and creates an environment of higher performance. This is VERY different from creating competition between students. This is the delicate a school owner/instructor has to create that allows less competitive and more competitive people to co-inside in the same class.
For our students we have a Hard rule that they practice and learn the whole curriculum. While there is a 'standard format' for progress it is not a hard rule. For example, if a 1st Dan is really good and wants to train purely in competition classes and go to circuit events for a year, no harm, no foul. Conversely, if a person wants to stay on our normal class program and never take competition classes, no harm no foul.

I largely agree with you as far as elite level competitors go. But that is a small sector of most schools. And it takes a completely different program to keep them fed and to get ready for competition. We have a lot of AAU and WT competitors in our competition classes. Some come from adjoining states to train and get ready. Conversely, people from our regular classes will briefly attend these classes leading up to local tournaments sometimes. Naturally, their results and expectations are different. It takes having the facilities and manpower to provide this offering.

In short, I fully disagree with your last statement.

Let the debate begin!!!:D
 
Back
Top