Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like it would be fun once in a while.
Best one I've heard of during a class is sparring unarmed vs armed with knife.
(Toe to Toe, not random attack from set location, with no face strikes for safety) Keep going until one or the other has clearly been beaten.
Substitute uniform for casual. and substitute knife for a colored texta or whiteboard marker. Now the goal of the unarmed person is not to get any color on them, and to disarm the other and get color on them.
Gives a very clear picture of whether your techniques actually saved you during the situation and if you would have walked away. Odviously minus the adrenalin. But at least your actually getting struck and have to think. Umm. My gut just got slashed. Might need to rethink what im doing. Good way to make the overly confident suddenly rethink themselves at the final results.
Luke
Hello ap...I think most of the people here with a Filipino MA background will have done this before. I certainly advocate doing it. It's instructive. But, as importantly, it's a lot of fun.
Hello ap...
Plus Juan on this idea. Not only should one play with unequal armament, it's important to play with unequal initiative, choices (two on ones, etc), tool access, fouling draws, etc. As someone else said- it's negligent not to consider such.
It's something we do fairly often. Our first grading requirements are arranged around defensive evasions against a knife, initially with pre-set movements, then moving into just evading following the principles set out in those written techniques. As a student progresses, there is more of an emphasis on free-responce training and pressure testing, up to and including groups and weapons. It's not "sparring" as most understand it, instead it is closer to a real situation in that there is a defined attacker and defender, and the tactics are not limited by the conditions of sparring (get away rather than need to stay in the situation, for example).
A friend of mine was telling me today that at his dojo they will sometimes spar where one person will have a weapon(padded of course) and the other will be bare-hand or will have a different weapon.
Was wondering if anyone else does this and their thoughts on it
That one and more. Types of terrain. Size of space. All kinds of stuff... just didn't wanna post too much- I'm windy to begin with.You make a good point, however i feel that you have missed an important one and that is the addition of unlevel ground
That one and more. Types of terrain. Size of space. All kinds of stuff... just didn't wanna post too much- I'm windy to begin with.![]()
A friend of mine was telling me today that at his dojo they will sometimes spar where one person will have a weapon(padded of course) and the other will be bare-hand or will have a different weapon.
Was wondering if anyone else does this and their thoughts on it
First of all that's a really fun drill to do with advance students. Not too sure on the practicality of it though. From my experience (especially with knives) they don't come out until somone is losing. That's when the person getting beaten pulls the knife. We do drills that use this concept. Sometimes you know it is a possiblity sometimes it is a complete surprise. The only time I can see the standoff with a weapon happening is in a mugging situation. Even then it is usually when they have ambushed the victim. It never looks like "sparring." At least not in the USA.
Just my 2 cents. Feel free to differ.