L
lvwhitebir
Guest
Originally posted by michaeledward
Did you miss the point that IRAQ DOESN'T HAVE ANY GERM WEAPONS. Duh!
...
There are no weapons of mass destruction.
There was no clear and present danger.
Sure, and when CNN says this stuff, it's all a big lie... And don't get me started on Hans Blix or Richard Butler. They wanted the invasion...
CNN 9/9/2002
Saddam's biological-weapons program was the deepest black hole. Despite more than 30 searches for various unconventional arms, inspectors did not even know of its existence until mid-1995, when Saddam's defecting son-in-law Hussein Kamal revealed that secret labs buried in Iraq's security, not military, apparatus were cooking up deadly germs. Iraq subsequently admitted it made batches of anthrax bacteria, carcinogenic aflatoxin, agricultural toxins and the paralyzing poison botulinum. Iraqi officials reported they had loaded 191 bombs, including 25 missile warheads, with the poisons for use in the Gulf War. They said they destroyed them after the conflict, but they presented no proof, and Western officials don't believe them.
CNN 3/14/2003
As much as 1,000 tons of VX are unaccounted for. Iraq also cannot account for as much as 2,245 gallons [8,500 liters] of anthrax.
CNN 2/17/2003
Hans Blix report to the UN
"To take an example, a document which Iraq provided suggested to us that some 1,000 tons of chemical agent were unaccounted for. "
CNN 10/30/1997
"The chemical and biological (weapons), there is no ambiguity," [chief weapons inspector Richard]Butler said. "They are able to produce those weapons."
Now, where's the proof that the US gave them biological and chemical weapons? I don't remember anything ever being said about that except as heresay.
WhiteBirch