KungFu Ranking

Drac

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
143
Location
Ohio
Greetings..
Had this very loud, long and animated discussion with some friends concerning the ranking system used by KungFu practioneers, I knew it was not belts but sashes, that is the extent of my knowledge..One said they used the same color system as Karate..I disagree..Could someone PLEASE help?? Is it the same for Northern and Southern disciplines??Thanks to all in advance..

Drac
 

Jade Tigress

RAWR
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
14,196
Reaction score
153
Location
Chicago
Don't know much about it myself. Can only tell you what I have experienced in the only 2 kung fu schools I've been to, except to confirm it is sashes and not belts, that they don't follow any standardized ranking system, and some don't rank at all.
(Correct me if I'm wrong my more experienced CMA friends).

My first school:
(sashes)
white - yellow - green - blue - brown - black - and red for Sifu's

My current school:
Black rope - white (sash) - yellow - advanced yellow - green - advanced green - blue - advanced blue - brown - advanced brown - red - advanced red - black
 

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,271
Reaction score
9,379
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
Most traditional Kung fu schools have no color belt/sash ranking system at all as far as I know. And I have never seen a Northern style with one. But that does not mean they do not exist.

And those that do I highly doubt the colors are the same since you can see different color ranking system between Jujitsu and Karate TDK and Judo, Karate and karate, etc.
 

mantis

Master Black Belt
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
5
Location
SoCal
every school uses a totally different ranking system. in chinese martial arts colors of shashes do not mean anything. To they should only mean 'how long' u've been going to class.. However genenrally you get light or bright colors when you're a beginner, darker colors in intermediate and they you'll get a brown->black.

btw, this is not related to your question exactly. but i read somewhere that the history of belts started as follows: old basic chinese wrestler would only wash their clothes but not the belts. the 'dirtier' your belt is the more experienced you are. if you wash your belt it means you washed away what you have learned. that's why the darker it is, the better you are until you eventually get it 'black' from wrestling in mud.
 

clfsean

Senior Master
MT Mentor
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
3,687
Reaction score
400
Location
Metropolitan Tokyo
Xue Sheng said:
Most traditional Kung fu schools have no color belt/sash ranking system at all as far as I know. And I have never seen a Northern style with one. But that does not mean they do not exist.

What he said.

Traditionally there was the teacher or the student. You knew who you were & where you were in the class. You always had big brothers & sisters (si hing & si jie), unless you're the very first student & again... you knew where you were.

The colored system is geared towards & works better for the American mentality. It's goal driven & visible at a glance. Nothing wrong at all with it, but not traditional & up to the individual teacher. More & more tCMA schools are adopting a coloring scheme & it works. Gotta be doing something right in there to maintain the quality & deliver the product the public is wanting.
 
OP
Drac

Drac

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
143
Location
Ohio
Thanks All...
 

Kensai

Black Belt
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
693
Reaction score
3
Location
West Midlands
At my Wing Chun class, we don't have belts at all, just to complicate the issue. We do have what could be referred to as gradings, they are formal assessments of your ability and how far you've progressed along a certain path, but they don't infer belts or certificates and awards as far as I'm aware.

You're either level 1, post grading you become level 2, level 3 and so on. The higher the grading level then determines the kind and type of techniques, forms, mentality etc that you are taught. Much the same as many other arts I imagine.
 

jazkiljok

Brown Belt
Joined
Jun 30, 2002
Messages
450
Reaction score
5
Kensai said:
At my Wing Chun class, we don't have belts at all, just to complicate the issue. We do have what could be referred to as gradings, they are formal assessments of your ability and how far you've progressed along a certain path, but they don't infer belts or certificates and awards as far as I'm aware.

You're either level 1, post grading you become level 2, level 3 and so on. The higher the grading level then determines the kind and type of techniques, forms, mentality etc that you are taught. Much the same as many other arts I imagine.

a friend of mine has a kid in JKD which is using a similar ranking system.

but i spoke with a student of Ark Wong many many years ago about this topic- he said there was originally no rank system per se, just knowledge as to who knew what. but at some point Wong and a few other schools instituted the sash system to match the karate ranking system, mainly so they could offer americans the same incentive/motivation to continuue but also so they could more easily compete in open competitions which were using division ranks.

i don't believe it ever was formally standardized from school to school.
 

funnytiger

Blue Belt
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
222
Reaction score
3
Location
Washington, DC
mantis said:
btw, this is not related to your question exactly. but i read somewhere that the history of belts started as follows: old basic chinese wrestler would only wash their clothes but not the belts. the 'dirtier' your belt is the more experienced you are. if you wash your belt it means you washed away what you have learned. that's why the darker it is, the better you are until you eventually get it 'black' from wrestling in mud.

lol, i heard this same story except it was samurais. *shrug*

I go to a traditional chinese martial arts school so there is absolutely NO belt system. But I can understand why a school would adopt one. Some people need something a little bit more than just the satisfaction of having the knowledge. Some need a little pat on the back and given a little something that reminds them that they succeeded.
 

michelle_gonzales74

White Belt
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
Taos, New Mexico
well, you know that i am completely new to this and can only tell you what i know at my sons class. they dont have any rankings.(i JUST found that out). because he knows all his students well he knows what level they are each at. they do have what he calls "beginner students" "junior students" and "senior students". but no belts or sashes....
 

Jimi

Black Belt
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
542
Reaction score
13
Location
Beltsville, MD
Xue Sheng is absolutely right, there are no 1000 year old belt or sash ranking systems. PEACE
 

pstarr

Master Black Belt
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
12
Location
Council Bluffs, IA
The system that I teach, Yiliquan, uses a belt-grading system. Many, if not most, traditional kung-fu school don't do this but I think it's time...
 

Jade Tigress

RAWR
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
14,196
Reaction score
153
Location
Chicago
funnytiger said:
lol, i heard this same story except it was samurais. *shrug*

I go to a traditional chinese martial arts school so there is absolutely NO belt system. But I can understand why a school would adopt one. Some people need something a little bit more than just the satisfaction of having the knowledge. Some need a little pat on the back and given a little something that reminds them that they succeeded.

Both my former school and my current one are traditional but use a belt system. I don't believe it has anything to do with giving anyone "a little pat on the back" or "something that reminds them they succeeded". Western culture and Eastern culture are different. Doesn't mean one is right and one is wrong. Just different. Using a belt ranking system is not a factor in determining whether a school is traditional or not.
 

Jimi

Black Belt
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
542
Reaction score
13
Location
Beltsville, MD
Hi Jade, I agree with you that a ranking system is a good reward & evaluation system and the presence of such a system does not invalidate the tradititonal skills taught there-in. I just like to point out (Using an exagerated example) that some people get fooled by the "I'm a chain belt in Gung Fu, my master taught me the quart of blood technique(LOL) and the chain belt I wear is 900 years old" statement. Some people not knowing any better get fooled by more charming lies than my exageration. I abosultely am not downing a MA for using a rank system, just those who lie/misinform to impress a potential student. I hope you see that there are some out there like this. PEACE
 

Syn

White Belt
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
While we have a sash system I believe. We hardly keep track of it. It's more a rank I guess you oculd say, since none of us actually where sashes (except sifu) but the ranks abide by color. Though this ranking system doesn't determine much being that sifu knows what each student is capable of.
 

Jade Tigress

RAWR
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
14,196
Reaction score
153
Location
Chicago
Jimi said:
Hi Jade, I agree with you that a ranking system is a good reward & evaluation system and the presence of such a system does not invalidate the tradititonal skills taught there-in. I just like to point out (Using an exagerated example) that some people get fooled by the "I'm a chain belt in Gung Fu, my master taught me the quart of blood technique(LOL) and the chain belt I wear is 900 years old" statement. Some people not knowing any better get fooled by more charming lies than my exageration. I abosultely am not downing a MA for using a rank system, just those who lie/misinform to impress a potential student. I hope you see that there are some out there like this. PEACE

Agreed 100%
 
OP
Drac

Drac

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
143
Location
Ohio
My thanks to all who posted...
 

qi-tah

Brown Belt
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
436
Reaction score
1
Location
Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia
I'm kinda puzzled by this one as well. My understanding of trad chinese arts is that you are simply as good as you are, so there is no need for a ranking system. But my current school grades students in trad diciplines (like Ba gua) using Wushu scoring. (The suggested length of time spent training between each Dan grading rises along with the required score to pass.)
So for instance, for my 1st Dan grading (last Dec - i passed, hooray!), i spent a year training after my entrance Dan, and i had to score an average of 8.25. I won't be going for my 2nd Dan for another 2 years.

In reality, what does this mean? No idea. I'm no better a fighter or practitioner than i was yesterday. The gradings aren't very even either. My teacher was pressuring me to skip 1st and go for my 2nd Dan, but i didn't feel comfy enough to do that. But there were some who did pass that i thought looked pretty shaky. I don't think ppl ought to pass simply 'cause they've been training once a week since the beginning of time. How does that help them?
 

funnytiger

Blue Belt
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
222
Reaction score
3
Location
Washington, DC
Both my former school and my current one are traditional but use a belt system. I don't believe it has anything to do with giving anyone "a little pat on the back" or "something that reminds them they succeeded". Western culture and Eastern culture are different. Doesn't mean one is right and one is wrong. Just different. Using a belt ranking system is not a factor in determining whether a school is traditional or not.

Jade Tigress, I don't believe I indicated in my post that either method was "good" or "bad". I may not agree with using a belt system, but I don't think it is "bad" either. However, I disagree that a belt system can be used to determine whether a school is traditional or not. Clearly, belt systems are not a part of the original curriculums of the schools but rather something that was introduced later on. That is not to say that a school that uses a belt system does not have traditional aspects, but I do not think that it classifies itself as a traditional school either.

But this is all my opinion based on my MA experience. I choose to go to a school that fulfills my needs and that's all that really matters.

- ft
 

Latest Discussions

Top