We just had an open tournament. Since I have become a judge, I too wish uniformity of criteria when judging forms. A nice checklist would be great. I was judging at a panel for black belt forms last Saturday. We had two Kung fu, 3 Karate, and the rest Taekwondo. In Kung fu, they seem to value fluid movement, balance, control, quick but high kicks. The karate guys like a show of tension-power, tumbling, loud kiaps, noise, spinning kicks . I think those two were made up forms. The Taekwondo like precise moves, high held kicks, long low stances, snapping hands and feet, power. It was difficult to judge. It was close to a three way tie for first with 6 judges except one judge gave his favorite an extra quarter point. Karate 1st, TKD 2nd, and Kung Fu third.
Then there are other details which have been part of judging. How the competitor addresses the judges. If she/he doesn't back up but turns around to go to position to start. Or whether he gets too close to judges table during the form. Or does a small error like a longer pause outweigh the power shown. How do you score points off for an obvious slip in the form? How do you score someone who has great power, noise, stances but lousy kicks or a lack of any kicks? Should a Kung Fu guy who had great form but not a "held" (at extension for a second)but high sidekick be penalized?
Then there is the favoritism which I really can't stand. The black belts that come with their students want them to have a good experience so invariably vote their way. Besides they don't have the same value system as everyone on the judging panel. Then if they vote last, as was the perogative of a 4th deg. he decided the vote by adjusting his score.
So how would a set of critieria be fair to all types of art? TW