I apologize for taking so long in responding to this post. I haven't been around much.
I'm the founder of the International Dragon Kenpo Association, among a group of others.
Lineage in Dragon Kenpo will differ per each person. Dragon Kenpo isn't so much a system of combat, it's more a philosophy that emcompasses all systems. Dragon Kenpo was founded by Ed Hutchison, a student of Jay T. Will. The curriculum of Dragon Kenpo is used by only a few actual Dragon Kenpo students. I believe it was just a vehicle to convey a message rather than an attempt at being the ultimate martial art.
The philosophy of Dragon Kenpo is that there isn't any ultimate martial art. That the ultimate martial art is different for each person. I'm a Kenpo man. I love the principles and precepts of American Kenpo. Others in the system are more into the arts that are in their background... Hapkido, Taekwondo, Kung-Fu, Ryu-Kyu Kempo and what they teach reflects their preference. Dragon Kenpo is about cross training to develop that ultimate personal art but remaining away from the politics of most arts. In American Kenpo you will be shunned by 16-tech if you are a 24-Tech. Support is hard to come by. I've known instructors in other arts to kick their students out of class because they cross trained.
Dragon Kenpo is about martial artists of various backgrounds coming together basically to support one another. To share ideas and concepts without all of the politics involved in other martial arts. Honestly the IDKA is not large enough to do that well, but we're working on it.
Politics are still an issue though, even in the IDKA... Mostly about whether Hutchison's certificates should be validated. Rank is a difficult issue. I've been a student of over 30 different schools and each one has had different requirements for rank. In some it was all physical. Your technique had to be sharp and you had to know the curriculum, but you didn't know anything about why. Then there were some that taught all 'why' and no 'how.' I've seen 'legitimate' instructors promote students to black belt that I wouldn't even give a green belt to. I've seen green belts who I thought should be black belts. There is no standard. Rank is relative just like the ultimate martial art is relative.
I'm not sure if I can be clear on the purpose and intent of the IDKA. I know it will differ based on who you speak to just like Dragon Kenpo will differ based on who you speak to. My Dragon Kenpo is American Kenpo 24 tech system with emphasis on breaking it down into pure motion (Motion Kenpo) so that my student will be able to see how any art can have elements of all other arts within them. Other arts exist because of different egos, philosophies, different strategies and tactics being used. Why should we limit ourselves? Deny that those borders exist and see what levels you can realize.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at
dragonkenpo@aol.com
Doug Turner