Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brian, frankly, he may be the most gifted, knowledgeable martial around, but he knows jack about competitive bjj, and it's obvious. If he were willing to shut up and listen to people who know better, things would be great. But instead, he's trotting out a blog post he found on Google, and because it has the name Gracie in it and kind of sort of supports his half baked position, it must be true,Actually Steve, I vouch for K-man. He is an extremely talented and gifted martial practitioner. One whom I would be happy to have at my back in an alley. While grappling may not be his area of expertise nor BJJ his field of study he is not a novice in this area at all and has worked with high level practitioners in this area. I base this on personally training with him and seeing his movement.
What we all can agree is that this incident is tragic.
Just like this one:
happens around 3:45 or so
and this one which happens almost immediately:
When competing in athletic events tragic incidents will happen. They are tragic for everyone competing and especially for the one severely injured and their family.
Where our energy would be better spent is how to prevent tragic injuries like this. One way would simply not to allow a 15 year old underage male to compete with adult males. Another would be for referees to really be on top of the rules and stop competitors in dangerous positions and restart them. No slams is a good start but referees need to enforce this, stop in dangerous positions and go from there. How they can do this and still incorporate so many advanced guard, open guard, etc. moves I am at a loss to explain. Needless to say the incident in the original OP and the videos I linked could easily happen at any tournament or competition by accident.
Steve, I agree that it was a freak accident. Not a slam and I do not think the referee in this incident could have prevented it. Though there should be training on what to watch for at the very least*
It's the kind of thing that needs to be looked at for tournaments. It is legal now, but maybe do some research on how many injuries occur from this move. For example, heel hooks are illegal in many grappling tournaments due to the high injury rate of them. Many neck cranks are already illegal for the same reason.
Here is a video of a slam, and one that surprises me that an injury didn't occur. But, watching this video and seeing the other one, you can see how it was a fluke accident.
As to being sued. I would have to disagree, an injury occured and a tragic one at that, but there is no evidence that there was ill intent to cause harm and the move was a legal move. If he would have been in guard and picked up the opponent and then slammed him down to the mat like you see in many MMA matches, then you might have a different story.
Not to mention, what about the other guy? He has to live with the fact that he paralyzed that kid for life on accident.
Sure, Transk53, and it's already done to a large degree. In kids divisions, any technique that puts pressure on the spine is banned. For example, in the kids brackets, a triangle is okay, but no pulling on the head to finish. No guillotines. No ezekiels. Nothing that would exert pressure on the spine.Is there not a apperatus involved where to White belts competing not be able to pull off certian moves? IE, ones that are considered at a next level, or indeed higher belt level, moves?
The emphasis is mine. I would say you're right, if this was the case.This is purely horrific and a damn tragedy by all accounts.
It's so hard to say, and without an affidavit or script from the guy who pulled the move (for what that is worth), it's more than a little academic for anyone on this forum to be making a strong call as to whether it was legit/without bad intentions or a deliberate illegal move or intended to be a spear/pile-driver.
I couldn't see, did we have a transcript of any kind or sound bite from the guy as to his intentions?
That said, from looking at the clips numerous times for my two cents I am leaning a little to thinking at the least there could be negligence here, it looks like a very poorly performed and ill-intended move. It was performed so badly that injury was a likely outcome. I am the last to endorse suing in a competitive or sanctioned sports/fight environment - but if someone is doing illegal moves or carrying out uncontrolled, negligent techniques (a far greyer area I concede), then I say they may be fair game to litigation. Let a court decide what his intentions were on the evidence and his submissions.
The emphasis is mine. I would say you're right, if this was the case.
But people who are familiar with competitive BJJ on this forum seem to all agree that this isn't what happened in this case. We have one guy here, in k-man, who admits to knowing very little about the subject, asserting that the kid should be sued.
Take a look at the instructional video I posted earlier in the thread. If you watch that and then watch the video in the OP, I think it's pretty clear that this wasn't a malicious intent to spike or slam the competitor. Rather, it was a fluke accident occurring in the execution of a common technique. It's a damn shame, too.
To be clear, I don't know whether anyone was sued or not. I just think it would be a shame if that 19 year old kid had to go through that on top of knowing that he severely injured another person. I can't imagine.
I've actually seen referees in local tournaments tell a guy, "Watch the slam." You can see it coming, when they pick the opponent up off the ground. The athletes are all warned about dangerous techniques before they compete, whether it's heel hooks, neck cranks, slams or reaping the knee (which is a big one).
Sure, Transk53, and it's already done to a large degree. In kids divisions, any technique that puts pressure on the spine is banned. For example, in the kids brackets, a triangle is okay, but no pulling on the head to finish. No guillotines. No ezekiels. Nothing that would exert pressure on the spine.
In adult divisions, neck cranks are illegal, and while you can use a can opener within closed guard, you have to let it go once the guard is open (in other words, that's a minor exception to the neck crank, but only because the guy on bottom can relieve the pressure on his neck by simply opening his guard.)
There is also a general principle for kids that tears equal tap. In other words, if water comes out of your eyeball and lands on your cheek, you are done, whether you tapped or not.
I don't fault that referee one bit. That technique is one I've seen countless times, and I've never seen it cause any injury to a person.
If the question on the table is how to prevent this in the future, I'd say the only thing that could have been done (or could be done in the future) is to be more mindful of putting kids into the adult brackets. But even there, I'd say it's case by case, and really provided that the parents, the coaches and the kid were all in agreement and felt he was ready, I can see it.
But the bottom line is this. I think this is a terrible thing, but I'm not convinced that anything like this could be avoided, any more than you can completely eliminate injuries in literally any activity. It's a contact sport, just like any other. Overall, I've seen fewer injuries in jiu jitsu than I've seen in much less time watching youth soccer or football games.
I was at a tournament just this last Saturday here in the Seattle/Tacoma area. It was huge for a single day event. There were over 800 gi matches and close to 450 no-gi matches. No serious injuries and only a few minor ankle twists or sore elbows. This is typical. In 8 years, I've seen two serious injuries. One was a neck injury from a guy who got stacked and rolled funny (not broken, but it was scary). Another was a guy who reached back to catch himself on a takedown, and you can guess what happened to his arm.
I wasn't refereeing on Saturday, but I've reffed in the past. I've been to many, many local referee training camps and have attended the "official" IBJJF seminar in the past as well, down in California. I've seen probably over 10,000 competitive matches in person, some as a fan, some as a referee, and many working the tournament in some other capacity (usually managing the brackets). Referees do look for dangerous situations, and they do anticipate trouble.
I've actually seen referees in local tournaments tell a guy, "Watch the slam." You can see it coming, when they pick the opponent up off the ground. The athletes are all warned about dangerous techniques before they compete, whether it's heel hooks, neck cranks, slams or reaping the knee (which is a big one).
In addition, we make the kids brackets based upon the age, belt and weight of the kids who actually apply. We discourage any child from cutting weight, and try to match the kids up with other kids who are about their same size, age and experience level. It's a pain, but it's worth it, because you don't want a 12 year old yellow belt who weighs 65 lbs grappling against a 12 year old yellow belt who weighs 130 lbs.
My point is, I agree that we should do everything we can to keep people safe, but there's a point where you would have to bubble wrap kids to do this. The only sure fire way to keep a kid from getting injured doing anything is to prevent them from doing everything.
Excellent points and you're absolutely right. It's a tough one. Any technique done incorrectly can be dangerous, and I agree with you that this kid executed the technique poorly. But, really, even as I type this, I'm thinking that it happens all the time. Rolling with white belts is crazy. You just never know what they're going to do.Hi Steve, the jury is still out, but having looked over that video you posted (thanks for that) several times and revisiting the original Op video, I understand completely where you are coming from, I do agree that it does seem like this would be the move he was trying...
...although by my eye, in your video, the practitioner in your video employed the move with a higher stance in bringing the opponent down as he was flipping so that the opponent was not so smothered into the ground and impacted on by his body weight as compared to the horrific original posted video, where the "flipper" damn well lands with all his weight on the bottom guy in such a vulnerable position. Do you agree? There may still be an argument that the technique was attempted so shockingly from a position or in a manner that could well do damage.
When competing in athletic events tragic incidents will happen. They are tragic for everyone competing and especially for the one severely injured and their family.
Where our energy would be better spent is how to prevent tragic injuries like this. One way would simply not to allow a 15 year old underage male to compete with adult males. Another would be for referees to really be on top of the rules and stop competitors in dangerous positions and restart them. No slams is a good start but referees need to enforce this, stop in dangerous positions and go from there. How they can do this and still incorporate so many advanced guard, open guard, etc. moves I am at a loss to explain. Needless to say the incident in the original OP and the videos I linked could easily happen at any tournament or competition by accident.
I don't fault that referee one bit. That technique is one I've seen countless times, and I've never seen it cause any injury to a person.e knee (which is a big one).
.