StudentCarl
3rd Black Belt
I wasn't even thinking of the skilled trades. I was just thinking of general conversation. Telling your kids that they must master addition and subtraction before they can move onto multiplication, for example.
Also, "mastering" basic skills is not the same as being a master in any way. It simply means that you have learned the basics and can consistently perform them. I learned and could consistently and correctly perform a front kick and a reverse punch, probably during my first month of class back in the seventies. I had "mastered" two very basic skills.
As far as the skilled trades go, there are various requirements that one must meet to be a master tradesman, all of which presume that you have long since mastered the raw basics of your craft.
As for deeper understanding, that generally goes with mastery well beyond "mastering the basic," which is primarilly a physical endeavor in the martial arts.
I understand and don't have a problem with your ideas. I just don't like the idea that when you use the word as a verb 'master' it has a different standard from using it as a noun 'master'. I have no problem using the term 'proficient' with first dans, but their heads are inflated enough already that I don't like saying they have mastered something because I still expect them to continue to improve. That may be nitpicky, but as an English teacher during the day I dislike using word in confusing ways. I think that having different standards for verb and noun is lost on many, but if others don't see the problem, fine.