If there are 50% fewer people in a store than usual (and the remaning folks make use of the space to keep some distance), your risk of contracting (or spreading) the virus is commensurately reduced. I can't find an immunologist or epidemiologist of any repute who doesn't hold that opinion.
that has certain vagueness in it , how many people are usually in the store, what the density of those people and how much room do the other people give you ?
and by how much is your risk reduced /
this is rhetorical, you clearly cant answer as you dont know, but then neither does anybody else, making claims its had any noticeable effect on the death impossible to substantiate
whats clear to me is the 2 m rule they have tried to enforce in the UK is completely inadequate, when your going to stand 2 m from other people for an hour or more to get into the shop and are then going to interact with the check out staff at considerably less than 2 m, and received money that hasn't been sterilised
and whilst large supermarkets, may be able to put some controls in place, the extended queuing they have set up has driven people to shop at small local stores that dont have the means to set up entry control or enough room to allow any distancing to take place for the increased volume of people, they have taken a relatively low risk environment and moved the problem to multiple high risk environments, quite possibly greatly increasing the deaths>? but almost certainly negating any benefits the supermarket controls have given
the science may be good, the application of that science is some what different